Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

United Against Nuclear Iran

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Print Friendly

 

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is an advocacy organization closely tied to neoconservative and other “pro-Israel” factions that promotes a confrontational U.S. stance towards Iran, particularly with respect to its nuclear program. A program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a 501(c)(3) organization, UANI’s aims include informing “the public about the nature of the Iranian regime”; heightening “awareness nationally and internationally about the danger that a nuclear-armed Iran poses to the region and the world”; persuading “the regime in Tehran to desist from its quest for nuclear weapons, while striving not to punish the Iranian people”; and promoting “efforts that focus on vigorous national and international, social, economic, political, and diplomatic measures.”[1]

The group is led by an advisory board whose members include several notable ideological foreign policy militarists like John Bolton, high-profile Republican Party figures like Jeb Bush, and former high-ranking foreign government officials. Gary Samore, an arms control adviser in the Obama administration, served as UANI’s president from September 2013 to August 2015. He stepped down after adoption of the 2015 nuclear agreement, which he supported though UANI opposed.[2] Wrote one commentator: “We’ve reached the point at which United Against Nuclear Iran has failed to persuade its own chairman that the deal must be derailed. A lobbying group that exists to oppose the deal has parted ways with its boss, who supports the deal.”[3]

Former Sen. Joseph Lieberman, a longtime neoconservative ally, currently serves as UANI chairman.[4] UANI’s CEO is Mark Wallace, a businessman and former diplomat who served as the George W. Bush administration’s alternate ambassador to the United Nations.[5]

UANI enthusiastically welcomed the election of Donald Trump, claiming that the new president would be “positioned to swiftly pull the U.S. out of the Obama administration’s landmark nuclear agreement with Iran.” The group has also lauded reports that Trump’s victory is forcing companies to reconsider doing business in Iran and has pushed the Trump administration to put pressure on businesses seeking to re-enter the Iran market.

Activities

UANI employs a multi-pronged approach to isolate the Iranian regime economically and diplomatically, including by discouraging corporations from doing business in the country. On the legislative front, UANI “develops model legislation for adoption by the federal government and U.S. state governments to sever Iran from international trade and financial markets and prohibit investment in Iran.” According to its website, several of UANI’s recommendations were included in the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010.[6]

UANI prominently promotes on its website an “Iran Business Risk” campaign, maintains an “Iran Business Registry,” and organizes petitions and “name and shame” campaigns. The group claims credit for persuading “such corporate heavyweights as General Electric, Huntsman, Caterpillar, Ingersoll Rand, KPMG, Komatsu” to suspend their Iran business, as well as for securing legislative victories in California, New York, and Florida.[7] The group also has a specialized “shipping campaign” to “embargo Iran’s shipping and port sectors.”[8] As part of this effort, it developed the “Maritime Intelligence Network and Rogue Vessel Analysis (MINERVA) system,” which tracks purported Iranian shipping vessels, attempting to show how Iran has attempted to circumvent sanctions by clandestinely exporting oil.[9]

In another campaign, UANI pressured New York hotels to deny lodging to Iranian officials visiting the city for UN business, including then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.[10]

In addition to its business-oriented work, UANI publishes reports and talking points on Iran and its alleged nuclear weapons program, promoting notions that the Center for Research on Globalization has characterized as “propagandistic.”[11] Among its claims, UANI asserts that Iran is actively developing “nuclear weapons capability” and suggests that the country may have been connected to the 9/11 attacks—both ideas that have been strongly disputed by U.S. intelligence experts.[12]

Although UANI has generally avoided open calls for war, the group has on occasion explicitly promoted the use of military threats or action. In 2011, for example, after an Iranian-American was arrested for an alleged plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States in Washington, UANI called on President Barack Obama to“make it clear that Iran will face consequences for its actions, including military retaliation for attacks on Americans.”[13]

Much of UANI’s work has stressed the dominance of hardliners within the Iranian political establishment. The 2013 election of President Hassan Rouhani—a comparatively moderate candidate who campaigned on reaching a diplomatic accommodation with the West—did little to affect the group’s posturing. “While the new Iranian President speaks the language of conciliation, as it stands, the regime’s nuclear program and odious behavior continue,” read a statement on UANI’s website.[14]

UANI’s former president Gary Samore similarly attempted to lower expectations surrounding the nuclear negotiations between Iran and the group of world powers known as the P5+1 that followed Rouhani’s election. “What [the Iranians are] offering is really no different than what we’ve heard from the previous government, from Ahmadinejad’s government for the last couple of years,” Samore said in October 2013, after the Iranians tentatively offered to cap their nuclear enrichment at 20 percent and submit to additional inspections. “They continue to reject any physical limits on their enrichment capacity—meaning the number and type of centrifuge machines, the stockpile of enriched material that they have in country.”[15]

UANI characterized the interim agreement that followed the initial talks—which entailed significant restrictions on Iran’s nuclear enrichment in exchange for token sanctions relief while a comprehensive agreement was negotiated—as a “disappointment,” complaining that the sanctions relief offered in the deal was “disproportionate.”[16]

The group’s attacks on the diplomatic process drew criticism from the Obama administration. According to Salon, “a former Obama administration official who worked closely on Middle East policy” complained privately that “UANI and its allies ‘play the politics for the short-term but they don’t offer anything in terms of answers for the long term. … [T]hey’re not really interested in ensuring that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon. Iran bashing for pro-Israel groups is very common, but I’m concerned that they don’t understand that failure to address this issue will ensure that Iran gets the bomb or we’re headed toward war.’”[17]

UANI opposed the comprehensive nuclear deal reached between Iran and six world powers in July 2015, announcing that it would launch a “multi-million dollar campaign to educate the American people on the Iran nuclear agreement’s key deficiencies and weaknesses.”[18]

UANI’s decision to lobby against the Iran nuclear deal spurred its own president, Gary Samore, to step down from his post. “I think President Obama’s strategy succeeded. He has created economic leverage and traded it away for Iranian nuclear concessions,” Samore said at the time.[19]

Despite its optimism that the election of Donald Trump would provide an opportunity to push the United States to quickly back out of the nuclear deal, the new administration initially focused on pushing greater “strictness” in implementing the agreement and launched a lengthy “review” of the agreement.

Ideological Connections and Funding

UANI claims to be politically centrist, and its advisory board has included a number of prominent academics and political centrists, including Graham Allison, Walter Russell Meade, and Leslie Gelb.

However, the board’s membership has included a host of neoconservatives and right-wing nationalists, including former Sen. Joe Lieberman, a neoconservative Democrat who fell out with his party over his support for the Iraq War; James Woolsey, a former CIA director and high-profile neoconservative activist; Roger Noriega, a former U.S. representative to the U.S. Mission of the Organization of American States; Henry Sokolski, a hawkish strategic weapons expert; Mike Gerson, a torture advocate and former spokesperson for President Bush; Mark Lagon, a former State Department official who later served as an aide to Jeane Kirkpatrick at the American Enterprise Institute; and Otto Reich, a controversial Reagan-era figure implicated in the Iran-Contra scandal who maintains close ties to right-wing factions in Latin America.[20]

UANI’s CEO is Mark Wallace, a former U.S. diplomat at the United Nations, legal adviser to the Department of Homeland Security, and deputy campaign manager for the 2004 reelection campaign of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. The group advertises two original cofounders, both of whom were given high profile posts in the administration of President Barack Obama: the late Richard Holbrooke and the controversial “pro-Israel” U.S diplomat Dennis Ross.[21]

UANI also claims to represent a coalition of like-minded advocacy organizations. Coalition members, according to its website, include Christian Leaders for a Nuclear-Free Iran, the American Iranian Democracy Initiative, the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan, the Iran Task Force, Iran Watch, the Free Muslims Coalition, the Progressive American-Iranian Committee, the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, the Arcadia Foundation, and the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center. Other partners include neoconservative groups like the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and Réalité-EU, as well as Republican groups like the Log Cabin Republicans.[22]

In July 2015, journalist Eli Clifton reported that “the top donors to UANI are a pair of trusts associated with the billionaire Thomas Kaplan and a family foundations operated by Republican mega-donor Sheldon Adelson and his wife Miriam.” According to Clifton, Kaplan and Adelson accounted for “more than three-quarters” of the group’s total revenue for 2013.[23]

The revelation of Adelson and Kaplan being UANI’s biggest sponsors also led Clifton to question UANI’s “professed non-partisanship.” Clifton noted that Adelson gives “almost exclusively to the Republican Party” and that Kaplan gives to Republicans “at a ratio of roughly 10 to 1.”[24]

UANI reported a budget of around $1.2 million in 2013,[25] down from its peak of over $2.7 million in 2009.[26]

Scrutiny

UANI’s political connections attracted considerable scrutiny in 2014 amid revelations that the organization possessed information considered sensitive by the U.S. government.

The story came to light amid a legal battle between UANI and Greek shipping magnate Victor Restis, who filed a defamation suit against UANI after it accused him and his company of violating international sanctions against Iran and called them “frontmen for the illicit activities of the Iranian regime.” According to the New York Times, Restis and his attorneys charged that UANI was under the sway of “unidentified foreign interests”—presumably Israel—and attempted to subpoena the group’s donor records, along with testimony from an Israeli businessman and Meir Dagan, the former Mossad chief who has served as an adviser to UANI.[27]

In a surprise move, the U.S. Justice Department intervened to prevent the release of UANI’s donor records. According to the Times, “Government lawyers said they had a ‘good faith basis to believe that certain information’ would jeopardize law enforcement investigations, reveal investigative techniques, or identify confidential sources if released.” The paper called the Justice Department’s intervention “highly unusual” and noted that “American intelligence agencies are prohibited from secretly working with organizations to influence American public opinion and media. If the information does not belong to the government, it is not clear what makes it so sensitive. … Either way, the court filings indicated close ties between the American government and a group that has proved adept at pressuring the government and corporations to isolate Iran economically.”[28]

The news prompted speculation about what other information might be contained in UANI’s donor records. Journalist Eli Clifton, for instance, highlighted in a 2014 investigative report UANI’s ties to a billionaire mining magnate. “Among the pieces of heretofore undisclosed information the Justice Department’s shield might prevent from coming to light is the connection between UANI and one of the biggest investors in precious metals, Thomas S. Kaplan,” reported Clifton. Clifton noted that UANI CEO Mark Wallace has served concurrently as CEO of the Tigris Financial Group, which Clifton described as “an investment group controlled by Kaplan.” Other UANI employees have reportedly held positions at the Electrum Group, another Kaplan-controlled outfit.[29]

According to Clifton, Kaplan is a major proponent of investing in precious metals as a hedge against political unrest. Kaplan and Wallace, he wrote, “are betting big on investments in precious metals they say will retain or appreciate in value in an unstable economic and geopolitical environment. By Tigris’ own account, it stands to make money in the case of ‘political unrest in the Middle East’—exactly the kind of instability many experts think will become inevitable if naysayers of diplomacy with Iran [like UANI] have their way.”[30]

Clifton reported that although Kaplan is not mentioned on UANI’s website or public disclosures, he has specifically highlighted his connections to the pressure group. During a speech he gave after receiving the French Legion of Honor insignia from French Ambassador Francois Delattre in April 2014, Kaplan said: “A friends’ comment that one day our kids might ask what our generation did when we knew what the Iranians’ intentions were prompted me to become part of something bigger. Hard to know what the outcome will be but I do know that as much as United Against Nuclear Iran may not have had Tomahawk missiles and aircraft carriers at its disposal, we’ve done more to bring Iran to heel than any other private sector initiative and most public ones.”[31]

According to Clifton: “The published transcript of his remarks contained no mention of UANI or the comparison of the group’s work to advanced weaponry, presumably to be directed at Iran’s nuclear facilities.”[32]

In his July 2015 report for LobeLog Clifton confirmed that Kaplan was a major donor to UANI. Clifton reported that “Kaplan’s business interests also present an interesting angle on his funding anti-Iran advocacy like UANI’s … one of Kaplan’s mining concerns, the now-bankrupt Apex Silver Mines, Ltd., advertised itself in an annual report as a sound investment because of the potential for a ‘nuclear confrontation’ with Iran. Likewise with another silver venture called Sunshine Silver Mines: a 2011 investment prospectus talked up silver investments in light of ‘political unrest in the Middle East.’”[33]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1] UANI, “Our Mission,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/mission.

[2] UANI, “Senator Joseph I. Lieberman to Lead United Against Nuclear Iran as Chairman,” http://unitedagainstnucleariran.com/news/senator-joseph-i-lieberman-lead-united-against-nuclear-iran-chairman.

[3] Steve Benen, “The amusing story behind Joe Lieberman’s new gig,” MSNBC, August 11, 2015, http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-amusing-story-behind-joe-liebermans-new-gig.

[4] UANI, “Senator Joseph I. Lieberman to Lead United Against Nuclear Iran as Chairman,” http://unitedagainstnucleariran.com/news/senator-joseph-i-lieberman-lead-united-against-nuclear-iran-chairman.

[5] UANI, “Leadership,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/leadership.

[6] UANI, “Legislation,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/legislation.

[7] UANI, “Our Initiatives,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/our-initiatives.

[8] UANI, “Shipping Campaign,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/shipping-campaign.

[9] UANI, “MINERVA,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/minerva.

[10] Howard LaFranchi, ” ‘Not welcome’ sign out for Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,” Christian Science Monitor, April 30, 2010,http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2010/0430/Not-welcome-sign-out-for-Iran-s-Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad.

[11] Kourosh Ziabari, “Spreading Falsehoods about Iran: ‘United Against Nuclear Iran’: America’s War Propaganda Mouthpiece,” Centre for Research on Globalization, September 18, 2010, http://www.globalresearch.ca/spreading-falsehoods-about-iran-united-against-nuclear-iran-america-s-war-propaganda-mouthpiece/21089.

[12] See UANI, “Executive Research Reports,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/resources/executive-research-reports.

[13] Jim Lobe, ” Iranians Charged in Alleged Plot to Kill Saudi Envoy,” Inter Press Service, October 11, 2011, http://www.ipsnews.net/2011/10/iranians-charged-in-alleged-plot-to-kill-saudi-envoy/.

[14] UANI, “Rouhani: The First 100 Days,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/rouhani/100-days.

[15] Zach Pontz, “Former Obama Advisor: Rouhani’s Nuclear Offer No Different Than Ahmadinejad’s,” Algemeiner, October 17, 2013,http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/10/17/former-obama-advisor-rouhanis-nuclear-offer-no-different-than-ahmadinejads/.

[16] Eli Clifton, “Billionaire’s sketchy Middle East gamble: Meet the man betting on war with Iran,” Salon, August 11, 2014,http://www.salon.com/2014/08/11/billionaires_sketchy_middle_east_gamble_meet_the_man_betting_on_war_with_iran/.

[17] Eli Clifton, “Billionaire’s sketchy Middle East gamble: Meet the man betting on war with Iran,” Salon, August 11, 2014,http://www.salon.com/2014/08/11/billionaires_sketchy_middle_east_gamble_meet_the_man_betting_on_war_with_iran/.

[18] UANI, “UANI Announces National Advertising Campaign to Educate American Public on Key Elements of Nuclear Agreement with Iran,” August 10, 2015,http://unitedagainstnucleariran.com/press-releases/uani-announces-national-advertising-campaign-educate-american-public-key-elements-nuc.

[19] Michael Gordon, “Head of Group Opposing Iran Accord Quits Post, Saying He Backs Deal,” The New York Times, August 11, 2015,http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/12/world/middleeast/head-of-group-opposing-iran-accord-quits-post-saying-he-backs-deal.html?_r=0.

[20] UANI, “Leadership,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/leadership.

[21] UANI, “Leadership,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/leadership.

[22] UANI, “Coalition Information,” http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/about/coalition.

[23] Eli Clifton, “Document Reveals Billionaire Backers Behind United Against Nuclear Iran,” LobeLog, July 6, 2015, http://www.lobelog.com/document-reveals-billionaire-backers-behind-united-against-nuclear-iran/.

[24] Eli Clifton, “Document Reveals Billionaire Backers Behind United Against Nuclear Iran,” LobeLog, July 6, 2015, http://www.lobelog.com/document-reveals-billionaire-backers-behind-united-against-nuclear-iran/.

[25] Eli Clifton, “Anti-Iran Deal Groups Backed by $145 Million,” LobeLog, July 21, 2015, http://www.lobelog.com/anti-iran-deal-groups-backed-by-100-million/.

[26] American Coalition against a Nuclear Iran, IRS Form 990, 2010, http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/sites/default/files/ACANI_990_2010.pdf.

[27] Matt Apuzzo, “Justice Dept. Moves to Shield Anti-Iran Group’s Files,” New York Times, July 27, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/28/us/politics/us-justice-dept-moves-to-shield-anti-iran-groups-files-united-against-nuclear-iran.html?module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Politics&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=article.

[28] Matt Apuzzo, “Justice Dept. Moves to Shield Anti-Iran Group’s Files,” New York Times, July 27, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/28/us/politics/us-justice-dept-moves-to-shield-anti-iran-groups-files-united-against-nuclear-iran.html?module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Politics&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=article.

[29] Eli Clifton, “Billionaire’s sketchy Middle East gamble: Meet the man betting on war with Iran,” Salon, August 11, 2014,http://www.salon.com/2014/08/11/billionaires_sketchy_middle_east_gamble_meet_the_man_betting_on_war_with_iran/.

[30] Eli Clifton, “Billionaire’s sketchy Middle East gamble: Meet the man betting on war with Iran,” Salon, August 11, 2014,http://www.salon.com/2014/08/11/billionaires_sketchy_middle_east_gamble_meet_the_man_betting_on_war_with_iran/.

[31] Eli Clifton, “Billionaire’s sketchy Middle East gamble: Meet the man betting on war with Iran,” Salon, August 11, 2014,http://www.salon.com/2014/08/11/billionaires_sketchy_middle_east_gamble_meet_the_man_betting_on_war_with_iran/.

[32] Eli Clifton, “Billionaire’s sketchy Middle East gamble: Meet the man betting on war with Iran,” Salon, August 11, 2014,http://www.salon.com/2014/08/11/billionaires_sketchy_middle_east_gamble_meet_the_man_betting_on_war_with_iran/.

[33] Eli Clifton, “Document Reveals Billionaire Backers Behind United Against Nuclear Iran,” LobeLog, July 6, 2015, http://www.lobelog.com/document-reveals-billionaire-backers-behind-united-against-nuclear-iran/.

Share RightWeb

United Against Nuclear Iran Résumé

Contact Information

United Against Nuclear Iran
212-554-3296 phone
212-554-3299 fax
info@unitedagainstnucleariran.com
http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/

Founded

2008

Objectives

“Inform the public about the nature of the Iranian regime, including its desire and intent to possess nuclear weapons, as well as Iran’s role as a state sponsor of global terrorism, and a major violator of human rights at home and abroad; Heighten awareness nationally and internationally about the danger that a nuclear-armed Iran poses to the region and the world; Mobilize public support, utilize media outreach, and persuade our elected leaders to voice a robust and united American opposition to a nuclear Iran; Lay the groundwork for effective US policies in coordination with European and other allies; Persuade the regime in Tehran to desist from its quest for nuclear weapons, while striving not to punish the Iranian people, and; Promote efforts that focus on vigorous national and international, social, economic, political and diplomatic measures.”

Leadership 

  • Mark Wallace: CEO
  • Joseph Lieberman: Chairman
  • David Ibsen: President

Advisory Board 

  • Graham Allison
  • Cresencio S. Arcos
  • John Bolton
  • Jeb Bush
  • Irwin Cotler
  • Jack David
  • Charles Guthrie
  • Richard Dearlove
  • Mike Gerson
  • August Hanning
  • Olli Heinonen
  • Robert Hill
  • Avi Jorisch
  • Stanley Kalms
  • Bernd Knobloch
  • Matthias Kuntzel
  • Mark P. Lagon
  • Walter Russel Mead
  • Pauline Neville-Jones
  • Roger Noreiga
  • Ana Palacio
  • Otto Reich
  • Mark Salter
  • Gary Samore
  • Wolfgang Schussel
  • Michael Singh
  • Henry Sokolski
  • Ray Takeyh
  • Francis Townsend
  • Amy Westbrook
  • Jackie Wolcott

Related:

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

AIPAC has done more than just tolerate the U.S. tilt toward extreme and often xenophobic views. Newly released tax filings show that the country’s biggest pro-Israel group financially contributed to the Center for Security Policy, the think-tank that played a pivotal role in engineering the Trump administration’s efforts to impose a ban on Muslim immigration.


Print Friendly

It would have been hard for Trump to find someone with more extreme positions than David Friedman for U.S. ambassador to Israel.


Print Friendly

Just as the “bogeyman” of the Mexican rapist and drug dealer is used to justify the Wall and mass immigration detention, the specter of Muslim terrorists is being used to validate gutting the refugee program and limiting admission from North Africa, and Southwest and South Asia.


Print Friendly

Although the mainstream media narrative about Trump’s Russia ties has been fairly linear, in reality the situation appears to be anything but.


Print Friendly

Reagan’s military buildup had little justification, though the military was rebuilding after the Vietnam disaster. Today, there is almost no case at all for a defense budget increase as big as the $54 billion that the Trump administration wants.


Print Friendly

The very idea of any U.S. president putting his personal financial interests ahead of the U.S. national interest is sufficient reason for the public to be outraged. That such a conflict of interest may affect real U.S. foreign policy decisions is an outrage.


Print Friendly

The new US administration is continuing a state of war that has existed for 16 years.


RightWeb
share