Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Jamie Fly


[![Alternative text]!]
    • Foreign Policy Initiative: Executive Director
    • Weekly Standard: Contributor
    • National Security Council, 2008-2009

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Jamie Fly, a former adviser to the George W. Bush administration, is the executive director of the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) and a blogger for the Weekly Standard, two premier neoconservative institutions.[1] Fly’s experience includes serving in both the National Security Council and the Defense Department during the Bush presidency, stints at the Claremont Institute and the American Enterprise Institute, and working as a research associate at the Council on Foreign Relations.[2]   

Founded in 2009 by several high-profile neoconservative figures—including William Kristol, Robert Kagan, and Dan Senor—FPI is similar in its aims and operations to the now-defunct Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a letterhead organization associated with AEI that played an important role in advocating the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.[3] As a successor to PNAC, FPI is devoted to promoting an aggressive U.S. security posture in the post-George W. Bush era.

As FPI’s executive director, Fly is frequently quoted in the press on a variety of U.S. foreign policy issues, including increased defense spending, the need to “win” in Afghanistan, and regime change in countries like Iran and North Korea.[4]

Fly also teams up with representative from like-minded organizations to promote policy agendas. In October 2010, for example, Fly co-authored “Maintaining Defense Spending Critical to US-UK Special Relationship” with Alan Mendoza of the UK-based Henry Jackson Society, a group widely regarded as a bastion of neoconservatism in Europe. They argued that “Restoring appropriate funding levels to defense budgets” was the best way to “signal the firm commitment of both nations to our common defense and freedom.” They added, “The threat of tyranny did not disappear after the Cold War, but rather fragmented into new, asymmetrical dangers which span the wide spectrum of conflict. The free world still looks to the United States and the United Kingdom for leadership as we meet the challenges of global terrorism, cyber war, new and resurgent powers, piracy, and economic security. Strategic thinking and budgetary decisions should not focus on rebuilding our militaries based upon the current needs of the war in Afghanistan today, but on our ability to confront the growing threats of tomorrow.”[5]

Fly has used his perch at the Weekly Standard blog to promote a variety hawkish perspectives, including pressing a hardline on Iran, criticizing President Barack Obama for “engaging” “terrorists,” and excoriating the international community for criticizing the mid-2010 Israeli commando attack on the Palestine flotilla, which resulted in the deaths of several activists.[6]

According to his biography on the FPI website, during his time in the Bush administration Fly “was Director for Counterproliferation Strategy at the National Security Council, where his portfolio included the Iranian nuclear program, Syria, missile defense, chemical weapons, proliferation finance, and other counterproliferation issues. In the Office of the Secretary of Defense, he was an Assistant for Transnational Threats Policy, where he helped to develop U.S. strategy related to the proliferation of missiles as well as nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. For his work in the Department of Defense, he was awarded the Office of the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Public Service.”[7]

His other professional experience includes being “a Research Associate at the Council on Foreign Relations from 2002-2004, where he worked on European and national security issues. He has worked at the World Bank and interned at the American Enterprise Institute, the American Embassy in London, and the United States Senate. He blogs regularly at The Weekly Standard blog and Foreign Policy’s Shadow Government blog and his articles and reviews have been published in Commentary, National Review, Politico, The Weekly Standard, Forbes.com, USNews.com, and National Review Online. Mr. Fly was a 2004 German Marshall Fund Manfred Wörner fellow, 2009 Claremont Institute Lincoln fellow, and he participated in the 2004 Aspen Institute's Transatlantic Young Leaders Program in Berlin, the 2006 Atlantik Brücke German-America Young Leaders Conference, and the 2006 Bucerius Summer School on Global Governance.”[8]



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

Jamie Fly Résumé

    Affiliations

    • Foreign Policy Initiative: Executive Director
    • Weekly Standard: Contributor
    • American Enterprise Institute: Former Intern
    • Claremont Institute: Lincoln Fellow, 2009
    • Council on Foreign Relations: Research Associate, 2002-2004
    • German Marshall Fund: Manfred Wörner Fellow, 2009

     

    Government Service

    • National Security Council: Director for Counterproliferation Strategy, 2008-2009
    • Office of the Secretary of Defense: Assistant for Transnational Threats Policy, 2005-2008
    • American Embassy London: Former Intern
    • U.S. Senate: Former Intern

     

    Education

    • American University: B.A. in International Studies and Political Science
    • Georgetown University: M.A. in German and European Studies
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1]Foreign Policy Initiative, "Jamie Fly," http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/node/69.

[2]Foreign Policy Initiative, "Jamie Fly," http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/node/69.

[3]Jim Lobe, "PNAC Revisted," Inter Press Service, Lobelog.

[4]Foreign Policy Initiative, "Jamie Fly," http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/node/69.

[5]Fly and Mendoza, " FPI Bulletin: Maintaining Defense Spending Critical to US-UK Special Relationship,” FPI, October 22, 2010, http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/node/25328.

[6]For a list of Fly’s Weekly Standard contributions, see Weekly Standard, “Author: Jamie Fly,” http://www.weeklystandard.com/author/jamie-fly.

[7]Foreign Policy Initiative, "Jamie Fly," http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/node/69.

[8]Foreign Policy Initiative, "Jamie Fly," http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/node/69.

Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org