Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Independent Women’s Forum


Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

About

The Independent Women’s Forum (IWF), originally an ad hoc organization called Women for Clarence Thomas, was founded in 1991. Barbara Ledeen, wife of Michael Ledeen, was its first executive director. The IWF is the neoconservative counterweight to the progressive National Organization for Women (NOW). IWF is fighting the culture war against the inroads of the women’s liberation movement by challenging efforts to establish women’s equity in sports and by opposing the Violence Against Women Act and the Women’s Educational Equity Act. Its mission statement states that the IWF “is dedicated to advancing the spirit of enterprise and self-reliance among women, and supporting the principles of political freedom, economic liberty, and personal responsibility.” (1) (2)

The IWF is well connected to the Bush administration through various public figures, such as Elaine Chao, labor secretary, former Heritage Foundation fellow, and wife of Christian right leader Rep. Mitch O’Connell (R-KY). Lynne Cheney, who was until recently an IWF board member, is wife of Bush’s vice president; Paula Dobriansky was a board member before joining the administration as undersecretary of state for global affairs; and IWF member Lynne Munson is deputy chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities. The International Women’s Forum is using its high-powered media staff and publications connections to ensure that the issue of boys’ rights and the perceived repression of boys by the women’s movement become the leading civil rights issues of this decade. Internationally, the Independent Women’s Forum, along with religious right and right-wing social conservative organizations such as Concerned Women for America, Family Research Council, International Right to Life Federation, and American Life League, have either been granted or are seeking NGO consultative status with the United Nations with the encouragement of the Bush administration. (2)

Among the many other administration connections include Gayle Wilson, wife of Defense Policy Board member Pete Wilson; Wade Horn, an IWF adviser who directs the National Fatherhood Initiative joined the administration in the Department of Health and Human Services; Barbara Olson, a founding member, is the wife of Solicitor General Theodore Olson; and Michael Ledeen, husband of Barbara Ledeen, is a close adviser to Karl Rove among others in the administration. (2)

The IWF opposes affirmative action and Title IX programs (designed to prevent sexual discrimination in educational institutions that receive federal dollars), and believes that the over emphasis on women’s rights has resulted in fraudulent and exaggerated charges of rape, wage discrimination, gender bias, and domestic violence. The George W. Bush administration appointed the IWF’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Nancy Mitchell Pfotenhauer, to the National Advisory Committee on Violence Against Women. Pfotenhauer opposed the Violence Against Women Act along with IWF’s Margot Hill, who was also appointed to the committee. Pfotenhauer was also appointed delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, commissioner of the Secretary of Energy’s Advisory Board, and Secretary of Labor’s Committee on Workplace Issues. (3)

According to Media Transparency, the only valid part of IWF’s name is that it has women members. Its claim of independence, according to Media Transparency, is a dubious one considering that it receives most of its funding from conservative foundations. Neither can it claim to be a “forum” given that it voices only represents right-wing viewpoints concerning the status of women. (4)

Funding

Since 1994, the IWF has received over $3 million dollars from the following foundations: Sarah Scaife Foundation, Castle Rock Foundation, Earhart Foundation, John M. Olin Foundation, JM Foundation Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation, The Lynde And Harry Bradley Foundation, Inc., Scaife Family Foundation, and The Carthage Foundation. (5)



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

Independent Women’s Forum Résumé

Independent Women’s Forum News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources
(1) Independent Women's Forum
http://www.iwf.org/

(2) Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, “Women’s Forum Challenges Feminists, Gains Influence,” Washington Post, May 1, 2001.
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25123-2001Apr30.html

(3) Bill Berkowitz, “TeamBush to abused women: Fuhgedaboutit! Right-wing appointees spread their wings across the Beltway,” Working for Change, October 25, 2002.
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=13980

(4) Media Transparency: Independent Women’s Forum
http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipients/iwf.htm

(5) Media Transparency: Independent Women’s Forum Funding
http://www.mediatransparency.org/search_results/info_on_any_recipient.php?163
Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org