Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Brooks, Linton

linton-brooks.jpg
  • Center for Strategic and International Studies: Senior Adviser

  • Undersecretary of Energy for Nuclear Security (2003-2007)

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Linton Brooks, a former arms control negotiator and energy undersecretary who specializes in nuclear security issues, is an “independent consultant on national security issues” and an adviser to the Center for Security and International Studies (CSIS).[1]

Brooks was instrumental in charting an aggressive U.S. nuclear posture during the George W. Bush administration and also played a key role in arms control issues during the George H.W. Bush administration. Unlike many of his more hardline colleagues, he was supportive of accords concluded during the Obama administration, notably the New START agreement aimed at reducing Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons stockpiles. Brooks' support for the agreement appeared to hinge at least in part on the fact that it allowed for investment in costly modernization of the U.S. nuclear arsenal. In 2010, Brooks told the Union for Concerned Scientists that he saw "no down sides at all" to the treaty, claiming that it "provides clarity about the nuclear relationship" between the United States and Russia. He added that “the path to modernization of the complex runs through approval of New START."[2]

Brooks was a member of the team that produced the controversial January 2001 National Institute of Public Policy (NIPP) study "Rationale and Requirements for Nuclear Forces and Arms Control," which was regarded by many observers as a blueprint for President George W. Bush's 2002 Nuclear Posture Review.[3] Brooks also served on the Pentagon's Deterrence Concepts Advisory Panel, which helped implement the posture review. Head of that panel was Keith Payne, a hawkish nuclear analyst who directs the NIPP.[4]

According to anti-nuclear writer and activist Jonathan Schell, the Nuclear Posture Review that Brooks helped develop “announced nuclear targeting of, among others, China, North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Libya” and “recommended new facilities for the manufacture of nuclear bombs and the study of an array of new delivery vehicles.” Linking the policy to the Bush administration’s broader embrace of “preemptive war,” Schell quoted congressional testimony from Brooks, who once asserted that the U.S. should develop “bunker-buster” bombs because “it is unwise for there to be anything that's beyond the reach of U.S. power."[5] In an earlier statement quoted by Schnell, Brooks insisted that the United States should “make sure our weapons will in fact be seen by other countries as a deterrent. One element of that is usability. If nobody believes there is any circumstance where you will use the weapon, it is not a deterrent."[6]

Brooks was tapped in 2003 to serve as the U.S. energy undersecretary for nuclear security, a post that put him in charge of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which oversees the U.S. nuclear weapons infrastructure. His 2003-2007 tenure at NNSA was a tumultuous one, characterized by efforts to accelerate weapons modernization programs while sidelining nonproliferation advocates, a controversial decision to privatize nuclear weapons laboratories, and concerns over security lapses. Brooks was ultimately forced to resign in 2007 after failing to report a series of major security breaches.

According to the Oakland Tribune, early in his tenure Brooks pressured U.S. nuclear labs to ramp up work on new nuclear weapons designs after Bush signed a bill in November 2003 that repealed a 1993 ban on designing low-yield nuclear weapons—a goal that had been outlined in the Nuclear Posture Review. The Tribune reported that in a leaked memo from Brooks to lab directors, Brooks had written: "I expect your design teams to engage fully with the Department of Defense to examine advanced (thermonuclear) concepts that could contribute to our nation's security. … In addition, we must take advantage of this opportunity to ensure that we close any gaps that may have opened this past decade in our understanding of the possible military applications of atomic energy—no novel nuclear weapons concept developed by any other nation should ever come as a technical surprise to us." Commenting on the memo, Frank von Hippel, a physicist and arms control specialist at Princeton University's Program on Science and Global Security, told the Tribune: "This is really very distressing. They're saying, 'Go after it, guys. We're back in the fifties. Come up with all the crazy ideas you can—if there are any crazy ideas left out there.' This is fossil Cold War mentality surfacing again."[7]

In July 2003, the Guardian reported that under Brooks' watch, the NNSA had quietly disbanded an independent advisory board just ahead of a closed-door meeting to address the possible resumption of nuclear testing and the development of a new generation of so-called mini-nukes and bunker-buster bombs. According to some advisory board members, the decision to abandon the board was made by Brooks. Sydney Drell, a respected physicist and arms control expert, told the Guardian that the board's charter "was not renewed. I presume they did not value us or found us a nuisance. An independent, tough advisory board is very important in having a strong [nuclear] stockpile program. … They just didn't call us. We didn't hear from them." A few months earlier, Drell had cowritten with another advisory board member an article for Arms Control Today criticizing the government's nuclear weapons plans: "Rather than moving to develop new nuclear weapons,” they argued, “the United States should push to strengthen the nonproliferation regime through example and through stronger compliance measures directed at those who flout its basic purposes."[8]

Another hallmark of Brooks' tenure was his decision to put U.S. nuclear laboratories under the stewardship of for-profit contractors, which greatly increased the cost of running the facilities. Reflecting on the change, former Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Siegfried Hecker told a congressional committee in 2008, "When we went the direction of contractorization, we made a grievous error pushing the laboratories in a direction that simply isn't right for this country, and we've suffered from that."[9]

Security lapses at nuclear facilities during his tenure eventually forced Brooks to step down form the NNSA. Among the problems, which Brooks reportedly failed to properly report, were the theft of weapons-related documents from Los Alamos and a breach of computer files that included employees' Social Security numbers.[10] In announcing Brooks' resignation in early 2007, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said: "During my tenure at the Department, and even before, there have been a number of management issues involving the National Nuclear Security Administration, the most recent of which was a serious security breach several months ago at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. These management and security issues can have serious implications for the security of the United States. … Therefore, and after careful consideration, I have decided that it is time for new leadership at the NNSA, and I have asked for the resignation of NNSA Administrator, Linton Brooks."[11]

 

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources


[1] CSIS, Linton Brooks, http://csis.org/expert/linton-brooks



[2] Nickolas Roth, "Five Questions for Ambassador Linton Brooks on New START and Modernization," Union for Concerned Scientists "All Things Nuclear" blog, November 29, 2010, http://allthingsnuclear.org/five-questions-for-ambassador-linton-brooks-on-new/.



[3] William Hartung and Jonathan Reingold, "About Face: The Role of the Arms Lobby in the Bush Administration's Radical Reversal of Two Decades of U.S. Nuclear Policy," World Policy Institute, May 2002, http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/execsummaryaboutface.html.



[4] Linton F. Brooks biography, Energy Department (Web Archive), http://web.archive.org/web/20030804101740/http://www.energy.gov/engine/content.do?BT_CODE=AD_LLB.



[5] Jonathan Schell, "A Revolution in American Nuclear Policy," CommonDreams.org, May 26, 2005, http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0526-25.htm.



[6] Jonathan Schell, "Letter from Ground Zero," Nation, June 2, 2003, http://www.thenation.com/article/letter-ground-zero-3.



[7] Ian Hoffman, "Bush Presses Lab Nuke Research," Oakland Tribune, December 11, 2003, http://www.lasg.org/technical/Oak-Tribunedec11.htm.



[8] Julian Borger, "U.S. Scraps Nuclear Weapons Watchdog," Guardian, July 31, 2003, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jul/31/usa.julianborger; Sydney Drell, James Goodby, Raymond Jeanloz, and Robert Peurifoy, "A Strategic Choice: New Bunker Busters Versus Nonproliferation," Arms Control Today, March 2003, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_03/drelletal_mar03.



[9] Frank Young, " Sig Hecker's Comments on Contractorization," LANL: The Rest of the Story, May 8, 2008, http://lanl-the-rest-of-the-story.blogspot.com/2008/05/sig-heckers-comments-on.html.



[10] Keay Davidson, "Nation's nuclear lab chief loses job," San Francisco Chronicle, January 5, 2007, https://web.archive.org/web/20110604022151/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/05/NUKE.TMP.



[11] Energy Department press release, "NNSA Administrator to Depart," Energy Department, January 4, 2007, http://energy.gov/articles/nnsa-administrator-depart;  Associated Press, "Head of U.S. Nuclear Agency Leaving Under Pressure over Security Lapses," Associated PressUSA Today, January 5, 2007, http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-01-04-nuclear_x.htm.


Share RightWeb

Brooks, Linton Résumé


Affiliations

  • Center for Strategic and International Studies: Senior Adviser

  • National Defense University: Distinguished Research Fellow

  • National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP): Study Participant, 2001




Government

  • Energy Department: Undersecretary of Energy for Nuclear Security, 2003-2007; Former Director, National Nuclear Security Administration, 2003-2007; Former Deputy Administrator for Nuclear Nonproliferation

  • Pentagon's Deterrence Concepts Advisory Panel: Former Member

  • Center for Naval Analyses (CNA): Former Vice President and Assistant to the President for Policy Analysis

  • National Security Council: Former Director of Arms Control

  • Arms Control and Disarmament Agency: Former Assistant Director

  • Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty: Chief U.S. Negotiator

  • U.S. Navy: Former Director of Naval Intelligence




Education

  • Duke University: B.S. in Physics

  • University of Maryland: M.A. in Government and Politics

  • Navy War College: Distinguished Graduate

Related:

Brooks, Linton News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

Featured Profiles

Michael Flynn, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general, has spurred criticism for his hawkish critiques of the Obama administration’s foreign policy, with some saying his comments are out of line for a former military leader.


Donald Trump, the billionaire real estate mogul and 2016 GOP presidential candidate, is known for racist and reactionary rhetoric, in addition to his ignorance about nuclear weapons strategy, Middle East conflicts, and the value of allies.


Former Rep. Vin Weber (R-MN) is a “superlobbyist” who has supported a number of pro-war advocacy campaigns over the years, including those spearheaded by the Project for the New American Century.


The bingo magnate and notorious backer of Jewish settlements in Palestinian territories, Irving Moskowitz has also funded the campaigns of rightwing U.S. politicians like Florida Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.


Former Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) was among the most strident Israel boosters and foreign policy hawks in Congress.


James Woolsey, a former CIA director who views the “war on terror” as the “Long War,” is chairman of the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies.


Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), one of Congress’s staunchest foreign policy hawks and a “pro-Israel” hardliner, has been a leading advocate of hardening sanctions on Iran.


RightWeb
share