Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Olmert Takes a Break; Hagee Wins Applause

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, under fire at home for a deepening corruption scandal, left behind his political trouble in Israel for a two-day visit to hear Senators Barack...

Print Friendly

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, under fire at home for a deepening corruption scandal, left behind his political trouble in Israel for a two-day visit to hear Senators Barack Obama (D-IL), John McCain (R-AZ) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY) speak to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Saying he was “deeply impressed” by all the candidates’ speeches, Olmert cautiously dodged questions about his views on the race, in particular when it came to Iran.

“When a presidential election campaign is going on, it is best for Israelis not to express any views on issues in dispute,” Olmert said.

The Israeli prime minister did, however, praise Obama’s pledge in his speech to keep Jerusalem as Israel’s undivided capital.

“His remarks on Jerusalem were very touching,” Olmert said in a briefing after meeting President George W. Bush on June 4 at the White House.

The primary process in the United States, he said, was fascinating. He also said that he intended to speak by phone to each of the three senators returning to Israel.

“I watched the end of the race on TV, and I listened to the speeches of Obama, McCain and Clinton,” Olmert said, smiling. “I was mostly impressed by the respect with which they treated each other.”

The prime minister is under investigation for receiving cash donations from a New York businessman and has said he would resign if indicted. Meanwhile, Olmert’s coalition partners are calling for his resignation. So, too, are several members of his own Kadima Party, who are also demanding new elections for the party leadership.

Olmert had courteous words for the presidential candidates, but kept most of his praise for Bush, whom Olmert described in his speech to AIPAC as a “remarkable friend.”

Asked if this would be his last visit to Washington as prime minister, Olmert said only that he had no plans for another trip this year to the United States.

Right Turn for Agenda The annual debate over the AIPAC Action Agenda—the pro-Israel powerhouse’s lobbying platform—took a turn to the right this year, with the leader of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) introducing 14 amendments that were approved as official policy of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Most of the changes pushed for by the ZOA’s president, Morton Klein, were minor, but each gave a right-wing tint to the platform. The action agenda is produced by AIPAC’s executive committee, which includes representatives from major Jewish groups, as well as AIPAC board members.

In one move, the executive committee approved an amendment sponsored by Klein demanding that Fatah, the political party of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, change 10 clauses in its charter calling for Israel’s destruction. Attempts last fall to raise this issue at the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations failed. Palestinians maintain that the charter does not have any official standing, and Israel’s government has not taken up the issue.

AIPAC’s executive committee adopted the amendment, though it is not yet clear whether the organization will actively lobby in favor of congressional action on the charter issue.

The other major change that Klein successfully pushed deals with the American Embassy in Israel, which pro-Israel activists have long wanted moved to Jerusalem, the Jewish state’s capital, from its current location in Tel Aviv. Congress passed legislation in 1995 requiring the move, but administrations since then have utilized a clause allowing them to delay relocating the embassy if necessary for reasons of national security.

In the June 2 meeting, Klein proposed adding quotation marks to the term “national security” and opposing the government’s use of this waiver to prevent the relocation of the embassy.

AIPAC’s leadership opposed the amendment, arguing that it would put the pro-Israel lobby on record as contradicting the government’s reasoning on issues of national security. Nevertheless, the change passed with the support of an overwhelming majority of the committee.

A member of the executive committee, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that while the changes made to the action agenda are mainly symbolic, they can cause AIPAC embarrassment and run counter to the group’s stated support for the peace process.

Klein did propose a number of changes that were rejected, including a call to drop the word “peace” when referring to negotiations with the Palestinians.

Hagee Wins Applause Controversial evangelical leader Pastor John Hagee did not attend this week’s annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, but the continuing support he enjoys within the pro-Israel community was nevertheless on display.

Just two weeks ago, presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain rejected Hagee’s endorsement due to the pastor’s past controversial comments about the Holocaust and the Catholic Church. But in a closed-door, off-the-record session at the AIPAC conference devoted to the topic of evangelical support for Israel, there was plenty of enthusiasm for the embattled pastor among those who crowded into a Washington Convention Center meeting room.

Speakers at the session, titled “Friends in Faith: Evangelical Christians and the Pro-Israel Movement,” included Gary Bauer, president of American Values; John Buhler, founder of Christian Advocates for Israel, and David Brog, executive director of Christians United for Israel, the group led by Hagee.

“I want to take a moment to discuss with you a good man, evangelical pastor John Hagee,” Brog said to the audience. Before Brog could finish the sentence, the crowd broke into a lengthy round of applause, ending in a standing ovation. Among the few attendees who did not cheer at the mention of Hagee’s name was the Anti-Defamation League’s national director, Abraham Foxman, who has occasionally been critical of the ties between the Jewish community and Christian Zionists.

Leaders of the Union for Reform Judaism spearheaded the criticism of Hagee last month, after it emerged that in past sermons the pastor had portrayed the Holocaust as an attempt by God to force Jews to move to Israel.

Last year, Hagee was one of the keynote speakers at the AIPAC policy conference and was warmly welcomed by attendees. According to Brog, Hagee was invited to join this year’s conference as a participant but could not attend due to his busy schedule.

Nathan Guttman writes for The Forward. This article was originally published on June 5, 2008.

Citations

Nathan Guttman, “Olmert Takes a Break; Hagee Wins Applause,” Right Web, with permission from The Forward (Somerville, MA: PRA, 2008). Web location:
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/rw/4922.html Production Information:
Author(s): Right Web
Editor(s): Right Web
Production: Political Research Associates   Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: IRC editors read and approve eachcomment. Comments are checked for content and to a lesser degree forspelling and grammatical errors. Comments that include vulgar language andlibelous content are rejected, as are comments that do not directlyrespond to the published IRC article.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

The Foreign Policy Initiative, founded in 2009 by a host of neoconservative figures, was a leading advocate for a militaristic and Israel-centric U.S. foreign policies.


Billionaire investor Paul Singer is the founder and CEO of the Elliott Management Corporation and an important funder of neoconservative causes.


Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is known for his hawkish views on foreign policy and close ties to prominent neoconservatives.


Ron Dermer is the Israeli ambassador to the United States and a close confidante of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.


Blackwater Worldwide founder Erik Prince is notorious for his efforts to expand the use of private military contractors in conflict zones.


U.S. Defense Secretary James “Mad Dog” Mattis is a retired U.S Marine Corps general and combat veteran who served as commander of U.S. Central Command during 2010-2013 before being removed by the Obama administration reportedly because of differences over Iran policy.


Mark Dubowitz, an oft-quoted Iran hawk, is the executive director of the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

The time has come for a new set of partnerships to be contemplated between the United States and Middle East states – including Iran – and between regimes and their peoples, based on a bold and inclusive social contract.


Print Friendly

Erik Prince is back. He’s not only pitching colonial capitalism in DC. He’s huckstering ex-SF-led armies of sepoys to wrest Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya and perhaps, if he is ever able to influence likeminded hawks in the Trump administration, even Iran back from the infidels.


Print Friendly

Encouraged by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s statement late last month that Washington favors “peaceful” regime change in Iran, neoconservatives appear to be trying to influence the internal debate by arguing that this is Trump’s opportunity to be Ronald Reagan.


Print Friendly

When asked about “confidence in the U.S. president to do the right thing in world affairs,” 22 percent of those surveyed as part of a recent Pew Research Center global poll expressed confidence in Donald Trump and 74 percent expressed no confidence.


Print Friendly

A much-awaited new State Department volume covering the period 1951 to 1954 does not reveal much new about the actual overthrow of Mohammad Mossadeq but it does provide a vast amount of information on US involvement in Iran.


Print Friendly

As debate continues around the Trump administration’s arms sales and defense spending, am new book suggests several ways to improve security and reduce corruption, for instance by increasing transparency on defense strategies, including “how expenditures on systems and programs align with the threats to national security.”


Print Friendly

Lobelog We walked in a single file. Not because it was tactically sound. It wasn’t — at least according to standard infantry doctrine. Patrolling southern Afghanistan in column formation limited maneuverability, made it difficult to mass fire, and exposed us to enfilading machine-gun bursts. Still, in 2011, in the Pashmul District of Kandahar Province, single…


RightWeb
share