Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Diplomatic Wounds Leave Half-Healed Scars

Turkey and Israel are close to resolving their dispute over last year's flotilla fiasco, but the partnership that existed between them for more than a decade will almost certainly stay submerged.

Print Friendly

Inter Press Service

Turkey and Israel are close to resolving their dispute over last year's flotilla fiasco, but the partnership that existed between them for more than a decade will almost certainly stay submerged.

As a new flotilla of ships prepared to set sail for Gaza last week, Turkish and Israeli officials and analysts said that only a major breakthrough on Israeli-Palestinian peace could begin to revive a relationship that once featured joint military exercises and hordes of Israeli tourists visiting Istanbul. Even then, the officials said, they doubted that the warmth of the 1990s and the mid-2000s would resurface.

Suat Kiniklioglu, deputy chairman for external affairs of Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), told a conference in Washington sponsored by the Middle East Institute June 23 that "If there is not dramatic change in the Arab-Israeli conflict, I don't see a Turkish Embassy in Tel Aviv in five years."

Alon Liel, a former director general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry who served in Turkey in the early 1980s, agreed that the relationship is in peril.

"As long as there is no progress between Israel and the Palestinians – I mean Fatah and Hamas together – I don't think we will ever have a breakthrough with Turkey," he said.

Turkish-Israeli relations have gone through dramatic swings since Turkey became the first Muslim nation to recognise Israel 62 years ago, with ties plummeting during Arab-Israeli wars and after Israel's 1980 annexation of Jerusalem. The AKP, in power since 2002, has emphasised outreach to Muslim countries and taken a strong stand in support of the Palestinians.

The latest rupture dates from Israel's month-long assault on Gaza in late 2008-early 2009.

Israel said it had no choice but to act to stop a steady stream of rockets on Israeli cities and towns. However, "Operation Cast Lead", as Israel dubbed the Gaza campaign, killed more than 1,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, did enormous damage to Palestinian infrastructure and was a public relations nightmare for the Jewish state.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was particularly incensed because Turkey had been mediating at the time between Israel and Syria and had made considerable progress. Erdogan halted the indirect talks.

Relations deteriorated further after Israeli elections and the replacement of centrist Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's government by a rightist coalition led by Benjamin Netanyahu. Ties hit bottom on May 31, 2010 when Israeli commandos seeking to turn back a flotilla of ships trying to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza killed nine Turks aboard the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish vessel leased by an Islamic group, IHH, with ties to the Turkish government.

Israel now appears on the verge of agreeing to pay compensation to the families of those killed and to express regret for their deaths. Turkey, seeking not to reignite the dispute, has kept the Mavi Marmara from sailing again to the Gaza coast with a convoy of ships due to embark from Greece on Tuesday. Other ships are already on route from Spain and France.

According to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Ya'alon has been meeting with Turkish Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Feridun Sinirlioğlu. Other talks are taking place between Israeli and Turkish delegates to a U.N. committee of inquiry into the flotilla incident that is expected to issue a report within the next two weeks.

Ha'aretz reported June 26 that Turkey is seeking to tone down criticism of Turkish government ties to IHH in the report, which also calls Israel's actions legal but disproportionate.

However, the damage done to Israel in Turkish popular opinion – and the perception in Israel that Erdogan and the AKP no longer care about relations with the Jewish state – seem too deep to repair.

Both countries have altered their strategic orientations in ways that have undermined what has always been "an alliance of convenience", in the words of Henri Barkey, a Turkey expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Good relations with Turkey were part of an Israeli strategy of compensating for its lack of rapport with its neighbours by building ties with non-Arab nations on the periphery of the Middle East. Turkey, for its part, valued Israeli support in Ankara's war against Kurdish nationalists and cultivated U.S. Jews to lobby against anti- Turkish measures in the U.S. Congress sponsored by U.S. Greeks and Armenians.

However, with the world's 16th largest economy and growing ties to former Ottoman lands in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, "Turkey is coming into its own and no longer needs Israel or the American Jewish community," Barkey said. He also faulted Israel for taking Turkey "for granted".

The Arab spring has posed new challenges for Turkey's strategy of outreach to fellow Muslims and "no problems" with neighbours. Both Israel and Turkey are particularly concerned about events in Syria and the potential for conflict spreading across borders. However, Turkey's response to the Arab spring has been proactive, while Israel has hunkered down amid worries about trading risk-averse authoritarian regimes for pro-Palestinian populist ones.

The United States – its own power diminishing in the region – has encouraged both Turkey and Israel to resolve the Mavi Marmara dispute. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland noted last week that "we have seen some warming in relations between Turkey and Israel… We want to see that effort continue."

Now that his party has won its third election in a row, Erdogan can afford to be conciliatory toward Israel, at least superficially. However, Israel no longer figures prominently in Turkey's foreign policy vista. In his election victory speech, the Turkish leader saluted "all friendly and brotherly nations from Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut, Cairo, Sarajevo, Baku and Nicosia."

Tel Aviv was notable for its absence.

Jim Lobe contributed to this report.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

John Bolton, the controversial former U.S. ambassador to the UN and dyed-in the-wool foreign policy hawk, has been selected by President Trump to replace National Security Adviser McMaster, marking a sharp move to the hawkish extreme by the administration.

The Institute for the Study of War is a D.C.-based counterinsurgency think tank that has supported long-term U.S. military intervention in the Greater Middle East, especially Iraq and Afghanistan.

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) has been an outspoken proponent of militarist U.S. foreign polices and the use of torture, aping the views of her father, Dick Cheney.

United against Nuclear Iran is a pressure group that attacks companies doing business in Iran and disseminates alarmist reports about the country’s nuclear program.

Gina Haspel is a CIA officer who was nominated to head the agency by President Donald Trump in March 2018. She first came to prominence because of accusations that she oversaw the torture of prisoners and later destroyed video evidence of that torture.

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS), President Trump’s nominee for secretary of state to replace Rex Tillerson, is a “tea party” Republican who previously served as director of the CIA.

Richard Goldberg is a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who served as a foreign policy aide to former Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL).

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

New NSA John Bolton represents an existential threat to the Iran nuclear deal and any hopes for peace in the region.

Print Friendly

Hardliners at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies are working overtime to convince the Trump administration to “fix” the nuclear agreement with Iran on the pretext that it will give the US leverage in negotiations with North Korea.

Print Friendly

North Korea and Iran both understand the lesson of Libya: Muammar Qaddafi, a horrifyingly brutal dictator, gave up his nuclear weapons, was eventually ousted from power with large-scale US assistance, and was killed. However, while Iran has a long and bitter history with the United States, North Korea’s outlook is shaped by its near-total destruction by forces led by the United States in the Korean War.

Print Friendly

Europe loathes having to choose between Tehran and Washington, and thus it will spare no efforts to avoid the choice. It might therefore opt for a middle road, trying to please both parties by persuading Trump to retain the accord and Iran to limit missile ballistic programs and regional activities.

Print Friendly

Key members of Trump’s cabinet should recognize the realism behind encouraging a Saudi- and Iranian-backed regional security agreement because the success of such an agreement would not only serve long-term U.S. interests, it could also have a positive impact on numerous conflicts in the Middle East.

Print Friendly

Given that Israel failed to defeat Hezbollah in its war in Lebanon in 2006, it’s difficult to imagine Israel succeeding in a war against both Hezbollah and its newfound regional network of Shiite allies. And at the same time not only is Hezbollah’s missile arsenal a lot larger and more dangerous than it was in 2006, but it has also gained vast experience alongside its allies in offensive operations against IS and similar groups.

Print Friendly

Donald Trump should never be excused of responsibility for tearing down the respect for truth, but a foundation for his flagrant falsifying is the fact that many people would rather be entertained, no matter how false is the source of their entertainment, than to confront truth that is boring or unsatisfying or that requires effort to understand.