Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Convergence of Influence

(LobeLog.com) This week, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) holds its annual conference, and true to form, the list of speakers for this year’s...

Print Friendly

(LobeLog.com)

This week, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) holds its annual conference, and true to form, the list of speakers for this year’s conference reads like a who’s who of major U.S. and Israeli power brokers and hawkish policy figures.

Despite strong talk from Likud-aligned figures like Alan Dershowitz and folks from the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute who have attempted to downplay talk that the so-called pro-Israel lobby has had an undue influence on U.S. policy, AIPAC proudly states in the press release for this year’s event that it is “consistently ranked as the most influential foreign policy lobbying organization on Capitol Hill.” The press release also highlights that “ALL three remaining Presidential candidates, ALL four leaders of Congress. … AS WELL AS Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will address the conference.”

Helping set the tone for the conference during its opening session, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) emphasized what he saw as the urgent need for strong U.S.-Israeli relations in “a world full of dangers,” highlighting “threats” from Iran. He said, “Tehran's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons poses an unacceptable risk, a danger we cannot allow.”

The lineup of speakers, particularly in the “breakout sessions” on specific issues, is very narrow, ranging—in Israeli terms—from those in far-right pro-settler groups to the center-right governing Kadima Party. The highest-ranking Labor Party member listed in the program is former deputy defense minister Ephraim Sneh, who resigned from the Labor Party last week to form his own group, which is expected to join Kadima. Sneh strongly favors concessions for the Palestinian Authority under Abu Mazen, but he is strongly anti-Hamas and considers Iran an existential threat.

The spectrum of U.S. speakers is also remarkably narrow. On the “left” are former Clinton administration officials Dennis Ross and Daniel Benjamin, who is scheduled to speak on a panel that includes hardliners like Martin Kramer of the Sheldon Adelson-funded Shalem Center and Walid Phares of the neoconservative-led Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). Ross spoke at the opening session that was opened by McCain, along with Sneh, Vice President Dick Cheney daughter Liz Cheney, and Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman. Absent from the lineup are U.S. advocates of engagement with Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, or Iran.

Much attention, as in the past several years, will be devoted to Iran, which dominates the list of lobbying priorities cited on AIPAC’s home page. A panel on financial sanctions against Iran will be led by individuals who strongly favor them; same with another panel on divestment; and a third panel on “what does Iran really want?” will feature two Iran hawks, Ilan Berman of the American Foreign Policy Council, and Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP).

The session on Syria looks to be even more hawkish. In addition to Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), presenters include Tony Badran, a proponent of regime change based at FDD, and WINEP’s David Schenker, who spent much of George W. Bush’s first term serving as a liaison between Donald Rumsfeld’s Pentagon and key officials in the White House, including Elliott Abrams and I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby.

The panel on Hamas and Hezbollah follows the same pattern. Entitled “Double Trouble,” the presenters include Leah Odinec, an AIPAC official; Avi Jorisch, who used to be with FDD and now heads the somewhat oddly named Illicit Finance Group; and Bret Stephens, the pro-settler foreign affairs columnist at the Wall Street Journal.

Another panel, “Shifting Sands: The Changing Landscape of Today’s Middle East,” is also dominated by hawks, described by the program as “three of America’s most renowned foreign policy experts.” They are former U.S. ambassador to Morocco Marc Ginsberg, who until recently was on FDD’s board of advisors; Danielle Pletka of AEI; and Robert Satloff, executive director of WINEP. Ginsberg will also appear opposite Bill Kristol on a panel entitled “The Presidential Situation Room: How Candidates Develop Their Foreign Policy.” Ginsberg is a frequent contributor to Kristol’s Weekly Standard.

For those championing the Islamofascism line, “Terror in Our Backyard: The Reach of Radicals Operating in America,” will be a big attraction. Steve Emerson of the Investigative Project and Jonathan Schanzer of the Jewish Policy Forum, a group whose board of directors includes Daniel Pipes and Michael Ledeen, will be the presenters.

Lastly, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Sen. Barak Obama (D-IL) were scheduled to open the morning session on June 4. The big questions is, will Obama restate before this crowd his remarks about the distinction between being “pro-Israel” and being “pro-Likud,” or his sympathy for Palestinian suffering, or his belief that expanding settlements is not conducive to peace? The Israeli government’s recent decision to build nearly 900 new housing units in East Jerusalem certainly highlights the issue.

Jim Lobe is the Washington bureau chief of the Inter Press Service and a contributor to PRA’s Right Web (http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org).

 

Citations


Jim Lobe, “Convergence of Influence,” Right Web, with permission from LobeLog.com (Somerville, MA: PRA, 2008). Web location:

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/rw/4919.html Production Information:

Author(s): Right Web

Editor(s): Right Web

Production: Political Research Associates   Latest Comments & Conversation Area

Editor's Note: IRC editors read and approve eachcomment. Comments are checked for content and to a lesser degree forspelling and grammatical errors. Comments that include vulgar language andlibelous content are rejected, as are comments that do not directlyrespond to the published IRC article.


Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Although sometimes characterized as a Republican “maverick” for his bipartisan forays into domestic policy, Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is one of the Senate’s more vocal hawks.


Former CIA director Michael Hayden, a stalwart advocate of the Bush-era policies on torture and warrantless wiretapping, has been a vocal critic of Donald Trump


The former GOP presidential candidate and Speaker of the House has been a vociferous proponent of the idea that the America faces an existential threat from “Islamofascists.”


David Albright is the founder of the Institute for Science and International Security, a non-proliferation think tank whose influential analyses of nuclear proliferation issues in the Middle East have been the source of intense disagreement and debate.


A right-wing Christian and governor of Kansas, Brownback previously served in the U.S. Senate, where he gained a reputation as a leading social conservative as well as an outspoken “pro-Israel” hawk on U.S. Middle East policy.


Steve Forbes, head of the Forbes magazine empire, is an active supporter of a number of militarist policy organizations that have pushed for aggressive U.S. foreign policies.


Stephen Hadley, an Iraq War hawk and former national security adviser to President George W. Bush, now chairs the U.S. Institute for Peace.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

The Trump administration appears to have been surprised by this breach among its friends in the critical Gulf strategic area. But it is difficult to envision an effective U.S. role in rebuilding this Humpty-Dumpty.


Print Friendly

A recent vote in the European Parliament shows how President Trump’s relentless hostility to Iran is likely to isolate Washington more than Tehran.


Print Friendly

The head of the Institute for Science and International Security—aka “the Good ISIS”—recently demonstrated again his penchant for using sloppy analysis as a basis for politically explosive charges about Iran, in this case using a faulty translation from Persian to misleadingly question whether Tehran is “mass producing advanced gas centrifuges.”


Print Friendly

Trump has exhibited a general preference for authoritarians over democrats, and that preference already has had impact on his foreign policy. Such an inclination has no more to do with realism than does a general preference for democrats over authoritarians.


Print Friendly

The President went to the region as a deal maker and a salesman for American weapon manufacturing. He talked about Islam, terrorism, Iran, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without the benefit of expert advice in any of these areas. After great showmanship in Riyadh, Jerusalem, and Bethlehem, he and his family left the region without much to show for or to benefit the people of that war-torn region.


Print Friendly

Although the Comey memo scandal may well turn out to be what brings Trump down, this breach of trust may have had more lasting effect than any of Trump’s other numerous misadventures. It was an unprecedented betrayal of Israel’s confidence. Ironically, Trump has now done what even Barack Obama’s biggest detractors never accused him of: seriously compromised Israel’s security relationship with the United States.


Print Friendly

Congress and the public acquiesce in another military intervention or a sharp escalation of one of the U.S. wars already under way, perhaps it’s time to finally consider the true costs of war, American-style — in lives lost, dollars spent, and opportunities squandered. It’s a reasonable bet that never in history has a society spent more on war and gotten less bang for its copious bucks.


RightWeb
share