Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

The Return of the Nuclear Warriors

Note from Editor: Thanks to the recipients of Right Web News that have become IRC members or have paid the $25 suggested subscription price for this service. Right Web depends exclusively on the support of subscribers, IRC members, and individual donors. For those who haven’t become IRC members or subscribers, please consider doing so today—by clicking http://www.irc-online.org/donate.php for secure donations, including Pay Pal.

This Week on the Right

The Return of the Nuclear Warriors

When Stephen Hadley was nominated to succeed Condoleezza Rice as National Security Adviser last November, it marked the latest in a string of appointments by President Bush of hawks who have long promoted a high profile role for nuclear weapons in U.S. policy. Many of these figures cut their teeth during the heady days of the Cold War, promoting the notion that a first strike against the Evil Empire was indeed possible and that nuclear war was “winnable.” Now, with the Cold War over and the “peace dividend” dead, buried, and forgotten, these nuclear warriors are poised to rejuvenate U.S. efforts to build a new breed of “usable” bombs.

Like many of Bush’s other appointees—including Keith Payne, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense, Linton Brooks, the head the National Nuclear Security Administration, and Stephen Cambone, a long-standing Rumsfeld side-kick and the first ever undersecretary of defense for intelligence—Hadley was a member of a team of “experts” who, working under the auspices of the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP), produced an influential study in 2000-2001 advocating a number of hawkish nuclear weapons policies. The study, called “Rationale and Requirements for Nuclear Forces and Arms Control,” went on to serve as a blueprint for the Bush administration’s Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), which among other things called for developing usable, “low-yield” nuclear weapons. Many of those who served on the NIPP study subsequently got tapped to serve on the Deterrence Concepts Advisory Panel, a specialized Pentagon panel that was charged with implementing the policies outlined in the NPR.

More recently, in mid-2005, Bush further bolstered this contingent of unreformed nuclear warriors when he nominated Robert Joseph to replace John Bolton in the State Department. Like Payne, Hadley, Brooks, and Cambone, Joseph participated on the NIPP study and has been a long-standing supporter of a number of other hardline policy institutes, including the Center for Security Policy.

In this issue of Right Web News, we present a passel of profiles of figures and institutions involved in efforts to make nuclear weapons a central U.S. policy tool in the post-Cold War world. (For more on the growing clique of nuclear warriors in the Bush administration, see “ The Counterproliferationist” by Tom Barry.)

Featured Profiles

Nuclear Warrior Replaces Bolton
Arms control chief Robert Joseph is a new breed of militarist who believes that in a world where weapons of mass destruction may be proliferating the United States should bolster its own WMD arsenal and then threaten to use it against proliferators.
Right Web Profile Robert Joseph

Rumsfeld’s Henchman
Stephen Cambone, the first-ever undersecretary of defense for intelligence and a Rumsfeld sidekick, is a key figure in the right’s web of militarists, with ties to the neoconservative Project for the New American Century, the Strangelovian National Institute for Public Policy, and the missile defense and space weapons lobbies.
Right Web Profile Stephen Cambone

Bunker Busting Brain
Linton Brooks and the National Nuclear Security Administration are involved in efforts to develop so-called bunker-busting nuclear bombs, including the proposed Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator Weapon—and, according to one respected critic, “coming up with all the crazy ideas” about how the U.S. military can use nuclear weapons.
Right Web Profile Linton Brooks

A Fire-Tested Vulcan
Stephen Hadley, the new National Security Adviser,is a hardliner close to Vice President Dick Cheney and to the nuclear hawks in the neoconservative camp.
Right Web Profile Stephen Hadley

Nuclear Enthusiast as Top National Security Official
J.D. Crouch, a virulent nationalist, enthusiast of nuclear weapons, and Christian-right adherent, has recently become the right-hand man of National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley.
Right Web Profile J.D. Crouch II

Rational Nuclear War
Led by Keith Payne, a hyper-hawk who once co-authored an article that argued the United States must possess the means to wage “nuclear war rationally,” the National Institute for Public Policy is an influential—if not well-known—think tank which since the 1980s has been front and center in the efforts to get the United States to pursue ever-more aggressive strategic policies.
Right Web Profile National Institute for Public Policy

See also:

Center for Security Policy

Deterrence Concepts Advisory Panel

Rumsfeld Missile Commission

Rumsfeld Space Commission

Letters From Our Readers

(Editors Note: We encourage feedback and comments, which can be sent for publication through our feedback page, at: /form_feedback.html. Thank you.)

Re: Patrick Fitzgerald

Mr. Kristol:

Pardon me if I address you by your real title, since you are another in a long line of neocons claiming degrees you did not earn.

Your quote re Plamegate: “The problem for the White House (sic) is Patrick J. Fitzgerald, and we have no idea what he knows,” is both uniformed and childish. Had you actually gone on to earn a doctorate (as opposed to the tried and true GOP method of purchasing/claiming non-existent ones), perhaps you would not have made such a petulant and fearful statement.

In the words of reality based folks everywhere: “So the investigator that Bush claims he wanted to unravel an act of national betrayal is now ‘the problem’ for the White House. Why? Because he is trying to find out the truth.” (BuzzFlash, July 15, 2005).

Sorry, little man, but BuzzFlash is much more informed than you and your insulated, intellectually-challenged friends. Commander Bunnypants’ approval rating is now below 40% and you are desperately trying to spin reality to fit your agenda. Go back to college and actually enroll in a graduate program; perhaps you will learn how to do legitimate research before spouting off White House talking points in the manner of a slow eight year old.

And, with regard to Iraq: Enlist, or shut up!

Cheers,

– Dr. James Ackman
(Sorry, but mine is real, unlike yours)

Re: Consider the possibility: We’ve been Duped by the Neocons!

In my opinion, we need to pay a very great deal more attention to the possibility/likelihood that we have been duped by the neocons now in power in Washington, DC.

It seems likely to me that the most recent plot to excuse the Iraq war as an attempt to install a democratic government is nothing more than the latest excuse (since WMD, War on Terror, etc. didn’t work!) to hide the efforts to develop the neocon policy of Global Dominance being pursued by Cheney and Rumsfeld (who managed to train Bush well enough to let him be spokesperson).

What can we do to promote thorough analysis and public discussion of this poisonous policy ??

– H. Milton Peek

In the next issue of Right Web News

Democracy for whom, by whom, of whom? A round-up of influential individuals, government-supported groups, and policy institutes behind U.S. efforts to make the world “safe for democracy,” whether the world likes it or not.

If you would like to see our variety of free ezines and listservs, please go to: http://www.irc-online.org/lists/.
To be removed from this list, please email rightweb@irc-online.org with “unsubscribe Right Web.”

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Bernard Lewis was a renowned historian of Islam and the Middle East who stirred controversy with his often chauvinistic attitude towards the Muslim world and his associations with high-profile neoconservatives and foreign policy hawks.


John Bolton, the controversial former U.S. ambassador to the UN and dyed-in the-wool foreign policy hawk, is President Trump’s National Security Adviser McMaster, reflecting a sharp move to the hawkish extreme by the administration.


Michael Joyce, who passed away in 2006, was once described by neoconservative guru Irving Kristol as the “godfather of modern philanthropy.”


Mike Pompeo, the Trump administration’s second secretary of state, is a long time foreign policy hawk and has led the public charge for an aggressive policy toward Iran.


Max Boot, neoconservative military historian at the Council on Foreign Relations, on Trump and Russia: “At every turn Trump is undercutting the ‘get tough on Russia’ message because he just can’t help himself, he just loves Putin too much.”


Michael Flynn is a former Trump administration National Security Advisor who was forced to step down only weeks on the job because of his controversial contacts with Russian officials before Trump took office.


Since taking office Donald Trump has revealed an erratic and extremely hawkish approach to U.S. foreign affairs, which has been marked by controversial actions like dropping out of the Iran nuclear agreement that have raised tensions across much of the world and threatened relations with key allies.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Soon after a Saudi-led coalition strike on a bus killed 40 children on August 9, a CENTCOM spokesperson stated to Vox, “We may never know if the munition [used] was one that the U.S. sold to them.”


The West has dominated the post-war narrative with its doctrine of liberal values, arguing that not only were they right in themselves but that economic success itself depended on their application. Two developments have challenged those claims. The first was the West’s own betrayal of its principles: on too many occasions the self interest of the powerful, and disdain for the victims of collateral damage, has showed through. The second dates from more recently: the growth of Chinese capitalism owes nothing to a democratic system of government, let alone liberal values.


Falsely demonizing all Muslims, their beliefs, and their institutions is exactly the wrong way to make Americans safer, because the more we scare ourselves with imaginary enemies, the harder it will be to find and protect ourselves from real ones.


Division in the ranks of the conservative movement is a critical sign that a war with Iran isn’t inevitable.


Donald Trump stole the headlines, but the declaration from the recent NATO summit suggests the odds of an unnecessary conflict are rising. Instead of inviting a dialogue, the document boasts that the Alliance has “suspended all practical civilian and military cooperation between NATO and Russia.” The fact is, NATO was a child of the Cold War, when the West believed that the Soviets were a threat. But Russia today is not the Soviet Union, and there’s no way Moscow would be stupid enough to attack a superior military force.


War with Iran may not be imminent, but neither was war with Iraq in late 2001.


Donald Trump was one of the many bets the Russians routinely place, recognizing that while most such bets will never pay off a few will, often in unpredictable ways. Trump’s actions since taking office provide the strongest evidence that this one bet is paying off handsomely for the Russians. Putin could hardly have made the script for Trump’s conduct at the recent NATO meeting any more to his liking—and any better designed to foment division and distrust within the Western alliance—than the way Trump actually behaved.


RightWeb
share