Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Institute of World Politics

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The Institute of World Politics (IWP) is a Washington, D.C.-based graduate school of national security and international affairs.

Founded in 1990, the IWP describes itself as a professional school whose mission is to develop "leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft … based on knowledge and appreciation of the principles of the American political economy and the Western moral tradition."[1]

IWP’s website says that the school’s curriculum is “based upon an interdisciplinary foundational course of study that includes relevant elements of comparative political culture, Western moral precepts, practical political economics, and political and diplomatic history.”[2]

The school previously embraced a more distinctly conservative outlook. "The Institute's curriculum is based on recognition of the necessity for education in natural law—deriving from the Western, Greco-Roman, Judeo-Christian moral tradition,” reads an older statement on the IWP website. “The Institute recognizes that there is such a thing as truth and that truth is not relative. It thus recognizes the existence of historical facts that are true regardless of the perspective of observers of those facts."[3]

IWP's founding president is John Lenczowski. A staffer in the National Security Council under President Ronald Reagan, Lenczowski has worked for a number of neoconservative groups, including the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Ethics and Public Policy Center.[4]

IWP frames its curriculum as a response to what it describes as national security culture that focuses “excessively on arms, money, and the diplomacy concerning them, while neglecting many other instruments of statecraft that are decisive in the successful pursuit of a secure peace.” Emphasizing “non-material elements of power,”[5] its website declares that “when governments resort to force, it is often a sign of the failure to use the many non-military instruments of power effectively.”[6]

Nonetheless, a number of prominent foreign policy militarists have been associated with the school over the years. Its faculty includes the Heritage Foundation’s Jay Carafano, the neoconservative writer Joshua Muravchik, and Henry Sokolski.[7] Former Navy Secretary John Lehman sits on the group’s board of advisers.[8] Blackwater founder Erik Prince is a former trustee, and Center for Security Policy vice president J. Michael Waller is a former faculty member.

The institute also features a number of prominent hawks on its list of guest lecturers, including Ilan Berman, Paula DobrianskyDouglas Feith, Michael Hayden, Jon Kyl, Michael Novak, Michael O’Hanlon, James Schlesinger, and James Woolsey.[9]

According to its website, the institute’s library holdings include “thousands of rare and out-of-print national security books and documents from the American Security Council Foundation.” The American Security Council Foundation served as an important bastion for right-wing anti-communism during the Cold War and continues to promote the works of hardline foreign policy figures like John Bolton.[10]

The institute has received significant donations from right-wing foundations, including the Bradley ,Castle RockEarhartOlin, and Smith Richardson foundations.[11]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1] Institute of World Politics, "Mission," http://www.iwp.edu/about/page/mission/

[2] Institute of World Politics, “Welcome to IWP,” http://www.iwp.edu/about/page/welcome-to-iwp.

[3] Institute of World Politics, "Education Philosophy," http://www.iwp.edu/about/page/educational-philosophy.

[4] Institute of World Politics, "John Lenczowski," http://www.iwp.edu/faculty/detail/john-lenczowski-3.

[5] Institute of World Politics, “Raison D' Etre,” http://www.iwp.edu/about/page/raison-d-etre.

[6] Institute of World Politics, “About IWP,” http://www.iwp.edu/about/.

[7] Institute of World Politics, “Faculty,” http://www.iwp.edu/faculty/.

[8] Institute of World Politics, “Board of Advisers,” http://www.iwp.edu/about/page/board-of-advisors.

[9] Institute of World Politics, “Past Guest Lecturers,” http://www.iwp.edu/faculty/id.258/default.asp.

[10] American Security Council Foundation, https://www.ascfusa.org/.

[11] Media Transparency, "Institute of World Politics,"https://web.archive.org/web/20110916145338/http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/The_Institute_of_World_Politics

Share RightWeb

Institute of World Politics Résumé

Contact

Institute of World Politics
1521 16th Street NW

Washington, DC 20036-1464
Phone: 202-462-2101

Email: info@iwp.edu
Website: http://www.iwp.edu/


Founded

1990


Mission Statement (2014)

“The Institute of World Politics is a graduate school of national security and international affairs, dedicated to developing leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft, based on knowledge and appreciation of the founding principles of the American political economy and the Western moral tradition.”


Board of Trustees (2014)

  • Owen T. Smith, Chairman
  • Lawrence Cosgriff
  • Carlos Fonts
  • John Lenczowski, President
  • John Lovewell
  • Tidal W. McCoy
  • Colin McIntosh
  • Jack Nicholson
  • Edward Reilly
  • Joseph A. Reyes
  • David N. Rogers
  • Francis X. Ryan
  • Peter Schaumber
  • Barry R. Sullivan
  • William H. Webster
  • Aldona Z. Wos

 

Board of Advisers (2014)

  • Neil Alpert
  • Adam Bak
  • John K. Castle
  • Steve A. Fausel
  • Stephen J. Klimczuk
  • John F. Lehman
  • Michael Maibach
  • J. William Middendorf, II
  • Larry Pressler
  • Chris Ruddy
  • Curtin Winsor, Jr.

Related:

Institute of World Politics News Feed


Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Trump is not the problem. Think of him instead as a summons to address the real problem, which in a nation ostensibly of, by, and for the people is the collective responsibility of the people themselves. For Americans to shirk that responsibility further will almost surely pave the way for more Trumps — or someone worse — to come.


The United Nations has once again turn into a battleground between the United States and Iran, which are experiencing one of the darkest moments in their bilateral relations.


In many ways, Donald Trump’s bellicosity, his militarism, his hectoring cant about American exceptionalism and national greatness, his bullying of allies—all of it makes him not an opponent of neoconservatism but its apotheosis. Trump is a logical culmination of the Bush era as consolidated by Obama.


For the past few decades the vast majority of private security companies like Blackwater and DynCorp operating internationally have come from a relatively small number of countries: the United States, Great Britain and other European countries, and Russia. But that seeming monopoly is opening up to new players, like DeWe Group, China Security and Protection Group, and Huaxin Zhongan Group. What they all have in common is that they are from China.


The Trump administration’s massive sales of tanks, helicopters, and fighter aircraft are indeed a grim wonder of the modern world and never receive the attention they truly deserve. However, a potentially deadlier aspect of the U.S. weapons trade receives even less attention than the sale of big-ticket items: the export of firearms, ammunition, and related equipment.


Soon after a Saudi-led coalition strike on a bus killed 40 children on August 9, a CENTCOM spokesperson stated to Vox, “We may never know if the munition [used] was one that the U.S. sold to them.”


The West has dominated the post-war narrative with its doctrine of liberal values, arguing that not only were they right in themselves but that economic success itself depended on their application. Two developments have challenged those claims. The first was the West’s own betrayal of its principles: on too many occasions the self interest of the powerful, and disdain for the victims of collateral damage, has showed through. The second dates from more recently: the growth of Chinese capitalism owes nothing to a democratic system of government, let alone liberal values.


RightWeb
share