Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Ideas in Action

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Ideas in Action was a weekly TV program produced by the George W. Bush Institute and Grace Creek Media.[1] As of early 2017, the most recent posts on its website were form 2014.  Launched in early 2010, one of its Sunday morning talk show was described as a “weekly series on ideas and their consequences.” Appearing on PBS affiliates as well as on internet channels such as RIGHTNETWORK,[2] the program typically featured prominent conservative academics and political actors commenting on domestic and foreign affairs. Guests included Jeffrey Gedmin, a former AEI scholar and head of Radio Free Europe; Dan Senor, cofounder with William Kristol and Robert Kagan of the Foreign Policy Initiative; AEI’s Thomas Donnelly; Andrew Exum of the Center for a New American Security; former secretary of state George Shultz now based at the Hoover Institution; and former George W. Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson.[3]

Ideas in Action was hosted by James Glassman, founding executive director of the Bush Institute and veteran journalist. As former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy in the George W. Bush administration, he led the “government-wide international strategic communications effort.”[4] Glassman was also a senior fellow at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI). He co-authored, with Kevin A. Hassett, the ill-timed 1999 book, Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting From the Coming Rise in the Stock Market, which erroneously predicted that the stock market was “undervalued” and would continue to rise sharply in ensuing years.[5] Glassman is well known on the political talk show circuit, having hosted TechnoPolitics for PBS, MoneyPolitics for Washington’s ABC affiliate WJLA, and Capital Gang Sunday for CNN.[6]

Ideas in Action combined elements of Glassman’s previous shows and served as an on-air successor to the now-defunct Tech Central Station (TCS). As an internet magazine, TCS was a platform for a number of high profile hawks and neoconservatives, many, of whom played key roles building public support for an aggressive “war on terror” in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. Contributors included Carol Adelman, Ken Adelman, Henry Cooper, Newt Gingrich, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Michael Ledeen, Richard Perle, Donald Rumsfeld, William Schneider Jr., and James Woolsey.

Glassman launched TCS in 2000 as a “virtual think tank,” covering everything from the war in Iraq to Milton Friedman’s views on health care reform. Its mission statement read: ” The collision of technology and public policy has enormous implications for our lives and our future. Tech Central Station is here to help provide the right answers to many of those questions with the news, analysis, research, and commentary you need to understand how technology is changing and shaping our world, and how you can make sense of it all.”[7]

A December 2003 Washington Monthly article about TCS  described it as “journo-lobbying”—a new innovation in lobbying “driven primarily by the influence of industry. … The new game is to dominate the entire intellectual environment in which officials make policy decisions, which means funding everything from think tanks to issue ads to phony grassroots pressure groups.”[8]

According to the Washington Monthly, soon after ExxonMobile was listed as a sponsor, TCS began running articles attacking the Kyoto accord and the science of global warming. After the pharmaceutical lobby PhRMA hired TCS’s then parent company, DCI group (a public affairs firm), TCS columnists opined against legislation that would allow the reimportation of drugs from Canada.

In 2006, TCS was purchased by its then-editor Nick Schulz, becoming TCSDaily.[9] In 2008, Schulz, a former political editor on Fox News, became a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, editing AEI’s in-house magazine The American.[10] In 2010, TCSDaily was being published under the auspices of Ideas in Action.[11]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1]Ideas in Action, http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/; Danny Shea, “George W. Bush Institute to Co-Produce Public Television Show ‘Ideas in Action’,” Huffington Post, December 22, 2009.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/22/george-w-bush-institute-t_n_400777.html.

[2]Ideas in Action, “Ideas in Action with Jim Glassman Debuts on RIGHTNETWORK,” October 13, 2010, http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/ideas/2010/10/ideas-in-action-with-jim-glassman-deb.html.



[5]James K. Glassman and Kevin A. Hassett, Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting From the Coming Rise in the Stock Market, Crown Business, 1999.

[6]Lisa de Moraes, “Veteran news host Jim Glassman is back,” Washington Post, August 20, 2010, http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/19/AR2010081905865.html.

[7]TechCentralStation.com, http://www.techcentralstation.com/[no longer available].

[8]Nicholas Confessore, “Meet the Press,” Washington Monthly, December 2003.

[9]Nick Schuhlz, “Something Old and Something New,” TCSDaily, September 19, 2006, http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/tcs_daily/2006/09/something-old-something-new-1.html.

[10]AEI, “AEI Scholars & Fellows: Nick Schulz,” http://www.aei.org/scholar/136.

[11]Ideas in Action, “TCSDaily,” http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/tcs_daily/.

Share RightWeb

Ideas in Action Résumé

CONTACT INFORMATION
Ideas in Action TV
100 Cathedral Street, Suite 9
Annapolis, MD 21401
Email: info@ideasinactiontv.com
Web: http://www.ideasinactiontv.com

Related:

Ideas in Action News Feed


Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The new government will, once again, be the most right wing in Israel’s history. But this time, the length of the new government’s tenure will depend more on Netanyahu’s legal troubles than on the political dynamics of the coalition.


Given such a dismal U.S. record on non-proliferation, why should North Korea trust U.S. promises of future sanctions relief and security guarantees in exchange for denuclearization? If anything, the case of the JCPOA has demonstrated that regardless of its pledges the United States can reinstate sanctions and even bully private multinational companies to divest from Iran.


As Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Saudi crown prince and de facto ruler Mohammad bin Salman clamor for a war against Iran, they seem to have conveniently forgotten the destruction and mayhem wrought by the American invasion of Iraq 16 years ago.


President Trump’s announcement that he would recognise Israeli sovereignty over the western part of the Golan Heights destroys the negotiating basis for any future peace between Israel and Syria. It also lays the groundwork for a return to a world without territorial integrity for smaller, weaker countries.


The Senate on Wednesday passed a measure mandating the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Saudi/UAE-led war against Houthi rebels in Yemen. The vote marks the first time since the War Powers Act of 1973 became law that both chambers of Congress have directed the president to withdraw American forces from a conflict.


The Trump administration’s failed “maximum pressure” approach to Iran and North Korea begs the question what the US president’s true objectives are and what options he is left with should the policy ultimately fail.


In the United States, it’s possible to debate any and every policy, domestic and foreign, except for unquestioning support for Israel. That, apparently, is Ilhan Omar’s chief sin.


RightWeb
share