Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

High Frontier

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

High Frontier, founded in 1981, is a small pressure group that promotes extravagant missile defense programs, including the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), or “Star Wars,” launched under President Ronald Reagan. Though initially focused on building a national missile defense system, High Frontier’s scope expanded to regional theaters in Asia, Middle East, and Europe, as part of a global defense system.[1] High Frontier has also sponsored a project titled “Jamestown on the Moon,” with the aim of ensuring that future moon settlements would bear “the flag of Freedom and Enterprise.”[2]

According to Edwin J. Feulner, founder of the Heritage Foundation, High Frontier got its start when Joseph Coors “joined a small group assembled by [Hydrogen Bomb inventor Edward] Teller that called itself High Frontier.”[3] The Heritage Foundation funded the first study that High Frontier published on missile defense.[4]

Lieutenant General Daniel O. Graham, the organization’s founder, was a military affairs adviser to Reagan during his 1976 and 1980 presidential campaigns. He was also a high intelligence official, serving as CIA Deputy Director (1973-74) and then director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (1974-76). Even when working within the intelligence apparatus, Graham was a harsh critic of the CIA’s intelligence estimates, which he accused of underestimating Soviet military capacity and imperial ambitions.[5] Although discredited by impartial observers, this view was widely shared among neoconservatives and other hawkish policy ideologues, eventually leading to the establishment of the controversial Team B initiative in the late 1970s.

As an early supporter of the flexible deterrence and nuclear weapons strategies proposed by RAND’s Albert Wohlstetter, Graham believed that U.S. intelligence estimates about the purported Soviet threat should be driven by the assumption that the Soviet Union intended to defeat the United States.[6]

The chairman of High Frontier’s board is Henry Cooper, the former director of George H.W. Bush’s Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO).[7] Cooper was the chief negotiator for Reagan during the Geneva Defense and Space Talks, where he advocated for SDI programs.[8] He held a number of other positions during Reagan’s tenure, including assistant director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force. Cooper also conducted an independent review of SDI programs for then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney during the George H.W. Bush administration.[9]

In 2001, Cooper led the charge to reinvigorate the Star Wars programs, successfully lobbying former president George W. Bush to desert the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.[10] That same year he addressed the “Defending the Northeast, America and Our Allies from Ballistic Missile Attack” conference sponsored by former Rep. Curt Weldon (R-PA) and the Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. Of the 200 participants, at least 70 represented the top defense contractors: Raytheon, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin.[11]

Cooper is chairman emeritus of Applied Research Associates, Inc., whose defense services include “assessing the potential effects of weapons against critical national defense systems.”[12] Cooper has also served as a member of the Center for Security Policy’s National Security Advisory Council, labeled by Michelle Ciarrocca and William Hartung of the Arms Trade Resource Center as the “Star Wars Hall of Fame.”[13]

High Frontier and other proponents of missile defense systems contend that the 9/11 attacks underscore the need for a global missile defense shield, despite the fact that Star Wars systems have yet to be proven technically feasible and is not intended to defend against the type of attack perpetrated on the 9/11.[14]

High Frontier has received significant funding from organizations such as the Carthage Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Sarah Scaife Foundation.

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1]High Frontier, “Meet The Staff,” http://www.highfrontier.org/Highfrontier/main/Contact/Meet%20the%20Staff.htm.

[2]High Frontier, “Jamestown on the Moon,” http://www.jamestownonthemoon.org/.

[3]Edwin J. Feulner, “Coors, R.I.P.,” National Review Online, March 18, 2003, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/206203/coors-r-i-p/edwin-j-feulner.

[4] Edwin J. Feulner, “Coors, R.I.P.,” National Review Online, March 18, 2003, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/206203/coors-r-i-p/edwin-j-feulner.

[5]Congressional Record, “Tribute to General D.O. Graham,” February 1, 1996, http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1996_cr/h960201a.htm.

[6]Ted Hayes, “Henry Cooper Says U.S. Should Build SDI NOW,” Insight on the News, August 6, 2001, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_29_17/ai_77074807/.

[7]High Frontier, “Staff Biographies,” http://www.highfrontier.org/hf_biography_page.html.

[8]Missile Defense Study Team, “Defending America: Ending America’s Vulnerability to Ballistic Missiles,” The Heritage Foundation, March 25, 1996, http://www.heritage.org/Research/MissileDefense/BG1074.cfm.

[9]High Frontier, “Staff Biographies,” http://www.highfrontier.org/hf_biography_page.html.

[10]Henry F. Cooper, “Pentagon’s Bad Move,” National Review Online, December 18, 2001, http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-cooper121801.shtml.

[11]William D. Hartung and Michelle Ciarrocca, “Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration’s Missile Defense Revival,” World Policy Institute Special Report, July 2002, http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/axisofinfluence.html.

[12] Applied Research Associates, Inc., “National Defense and Aerospace,” http://www.ara.com/Capabilities/defense.htm.

[13]William D. Hartung and Michelle Ciarrocca, “Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration’s Missile Defense Revival,” World Policy Institute Special Report, July 2002, http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/axisofinfluence.html.

[14]Jeremy Singer, “Attacks Intensify Missile Defense Debate in U.S.,” Space News International, September 17, 2001. http://www.space.com/spacenews/missile_debate_010917.html.

Share RightWeb

High Frontier Résumé

CONTACT INFORMATION

High Frontier
500 N. Washington Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: 703-535-8774
E-mail: info@highfrontier.org
Website: www.highfrontier.org

FOUNDED

1981

ABOUT

High Frontier is the nation’s leading non-government authority on missile defense issues including missile defense, arms control, nuclear weapons, and strategic systems. Through our publications, research, congressional testimony and nationwide network of volunteers and supporters we provide a powerful voice that actively supports the deployment of an effective defense againstballistic missiles.”

 

 

Related:

High Frontier News Feed


Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Soon after a Saudi-led coalition strike on a bus killed 40 children on August 9, a CENTCOM spokesperson stated to Vox, “We may never know if the munition [used] was one that the U.S. sold to them.”


The West has dominated the post-war narrative with its doctrine of liberal values, arguing that not only were they right in themselves but that economic success itself depended on their application. Two developments have challenged those claims. The first was the West’s own betrayal of its principles: on too many occasions the self interest of the powerful, and disdain for the victims of collateral damage, has showed through. The second dates from more recently: the growth of Chinese capitalism owes nothing to a democratic system of government, let alone liberal values.


Falsely demonizing all Muslims, their beliefs, and their institutions is exactly the wrong way to make Americans safer, because the more we scare ourselves with imaginary enemies, the harder it will be to find and protect ourselves from real ones.


Division in the ranks of the conservative movement is a critical sign that a war with Iran isn’t inevitable.


Donald Trump stole the headlines, but the declaration from the recent NATO summit suggests the odds of an unnecessary conflict are rising. Instead of inviting a dialogue, the document boasts that the Alliance has “suspended all practical civilian and military cooperation between NATO and Russia.” The fact is, NATO was a child of the Cold War, when the West believed that the Soviets were a threat. But Russia today is not the Soviet Union, and there’s no way Moscow would be stupid enough to attack a superior military force.


War with Iran may not be imminent, but neither was war with Iraq in late 2001.


Donald Trump was one of the many bets the Russians routinely place, recognizing that while most such bets will never pay off a few will, often in unpredictable ways. Trump’s actions since taking office provide the strongest evidence that this one bet is paying off handsomely for the Russians. Putin could hardly have made the script for Trump’s conduct at the recent NATO meeting any more to his liking—and any better designed to foment division and distrust within the Western alliance—than the way Trump actually behaved.


RightWeb
share