Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Foster Panel

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

About The so-called Foster Panel–after its head, John S. Foster, Jr.–was established at the urging of Sen. Jon Kyl by the fiscal year 1999 Defense Authorization Act to report on the safety and reliability of the country’s nuclear weapons stockpile. As head of the panel, formally known as the Panel to Assess the Reliability, Safety, and Security of the U.S. Nuclear Stockpile, Foster, a foreign policy hawk, has been instrumental in pushing for new nuclear weapons development and testing.

According to a report in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, "Congressional advocates of nuclear testing and new weapons production have not been particularly subtle. Consider the ‘Panel to Assess the Reliability, Safety, and Security of the United States Nuclear Stockpile.’ … In its second and most recent report, released in February, the panel recommends, among other things, spending $4 billion to $6 billion over the next decade to ‘restore needed production capabilities … to meet both current and future workloads’; to construct a small-scale plutonium pit production facility at Los Alamos; to continue design work on new warheads; and to shorten the time needed to prepare for tests at the Nevada Test Site from 24 to 36 months to just three to four months. The Energy Department is reported to be working now on increased preparedness for testing."

Foster, a former member of the Committee on the Present Danger and an instrumental figure in the establishment of the Team B exercise in the late 1970s, is a longtime player in the U.S. military-industrial complex. He is an advisor or board member for several defense contractors, including Arete, Jaycor, United Technologies, and Pilkington Aerospace. (2)

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

(1) "Foster Panel Calls for Reducing Nuclear Test Preparation Time," Arms Control Today, April 2002
http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002_04/fosterapril02.asp

(2) Right Web: John S. Foster, Jr.
https://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/foster/foster.html

(3) Stephen Schwartz, "The New-Nuke Chorus Tunes Up," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, July/August 2001
http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/2001/ja01/ja01schwartz.html

(4) House Armed Services Committee: Testimony of John S. Foster, March 21, 2002

http://web.archive.org/web/20030211054419/http://www.house.gov/hasc/openingstatementsandpressreleases/
107thcongress/02-03-21foster.html

Share RightWeb

Foster Panel Résumé

Right Web connections

  • Harold Agnew, member
  • John S. Foster, Jr., chair
  • Jon Kyl, congressional proponent
  • James Schlesinger, member


  • Related:

    Foster Panel News Feed

    Panel to focus on religious freedom issues - The Catholic SpiritMaryland Board of Public Works approves contract with Alabama-based firm - Washington PostGrand jury report finds foster care staff overworked, allegations of abuse - fox5sandiego.com'Stories Worth Telling': A foster care awareness reading and panel discussion - Fauquier TimesState of the Taxpayer talks successes, losses - Midland Reporter-TelegramGrand Jury Report Finds County Foster Care Staff Overworked, Allegations of Abuse - Times of San DiegoSundance to dissolve Utah Advisory Board, seat a similar panel - The Park RecordMaryland panel delays awarding contract to Alabama-based company - Washington PostGOP senator’s new bill would force Facebook to publish Nazis - ThinkProgressPanel: Speaker Disinvitations Seldom Best for Students - Diverse: Issues in Higher EducationSeeking the Soul Joins Breeders' Cup Classic Rankings - BloodHorse.comReport: State ineptitude to blame for death of 9-year-old girl - The Providence JournalWith A Budget For The Next Three Years In Place, A Look At The Future Of LAUSD - 89.3 KPCCA Lack of Accountability at Artforum's Panel on “Art, Activism and Accountability” - HyperallergicDCYF Director: Report on girl’s death reveals ‘series of missed opportunities’ - WPRI 12 Eyewitness NewsAppeal filed over panel's approval for North Adams 'glamping' resort - Berkshire Eagle'Creating a movement': School hosts panel about film on childhood stress - Brown County DemocratAn “Astonishing Failure”: Independent Panel Concludes Charity Missed Opportunities to Prevent Rape of Students - ProPublicaForum sheds light on experiences of foster families - The MessengerImpact Of Standards On Physical Security | Expert Panel | Security News - SecurityInformed

    Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

    The Right Web Mission

    Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

    For media inquiries,
    email rightwebproject@gmail.com

    From the Wires

    A series of escalations in both word and deed have raised fears of U.S.-Iranian military confrontation, either direct or by proxy. It is urgent that cooler heads prevail – in European capitals as in Tehran and Washington – to head off the threat of a disastrous war.


    Vladimir Putin excels at taking advantage of mistakes made by Russia’s adversaries to further his country’s interests. Donald Trump’s Iran policy has given Putin plenty of opportunity to do that.


    The Trump administration’s claims about purported Iranian threats have been repeated by credulous reporters and TV news programs far and wide.


    This is the cartoon that the international edition of the New York Times should have run, at least as regards U.S. policy toward Iran.


    The assault on Tripoli by Khalifa Haftar, Libya’s renegade general and leader of the self-anointed Libyan National Army (LNA), has forced an indefinite postponement of key UN peace efforts in the country even as the Trump White House announced that the president recognized Haftar’s “important” role in fighting terrorists.


    With all eyes focused these days on Donald Trump and his myriad crimes, John Bolton’s speeches are a reminder that even worse options are waiting in the wings.


    Advocates of cutting U.S. aid to Israel rather than using it as leverage must understand how this aid works, how big a challenge it represents for advocacy, and how to make a potentially successful argument against it.


    RightWeb
    share