Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Family Security Matters

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Family Security Matters (FSM) is a neoconservative advocacy outfit based in Washington, D.C. that bills itself as the "national security resource for American families." Closely connected to other hardline outfits through overlapping board members, FSM plays a high-profile and controversial role advocating hardline policies in the "war on terror." Since 2004, it has championed a tough line on Iran, China, and other perceived enemies; supported the Iraq War; promoted preferential treatment of Israel; exhibited a highly Islamophobic response to democratic uprisings in the Middle East; and taken a hawkish line on Iran.

FSM’s website serves as a repository for right-wing commentary on these matters and others. A January 2012 commentary from the Foundation for Defense of Democracy’s Andrew McCarthy, for example, explained Islamist victories in post-Arab Spring elections in starkly anti-Muslim terms. “Enthralled by diversity for its own sake, we have lost the capacity to comprehend a civilization whose idea of diversity is coercing diverse peoples into obedience to its evolution-resistant norms, “ he wrote. “The Arab Spring has not been hijacked any more than Islam was hijacked by the suicide terrorists of 9/11. Islam is ascendant because that is the way Muslims of the Middle East want it.”[1]

In a similar, strikingly racist article released two days later, FSM contributor Ralph Peters chalked up the troubles in the Arab world to the practice of Islam, glossing over decades of colonialism and dictatorship and brushing aside problems associated with poverty. Calling the Arab world a “pathetic wreck of a civilization,” Peters concluded, “Arabs are, occasionally, a deadly annoyance to us, but they’ve been an immeasurable disaster to themselves.”[2]

In another January 2012 posting, FSM Contributing Editor Mark Silverberg (also an analyst for the Ariel Center for Policy Research) described the Iranian clerical regime in messianic, apocalyptic terms. “Iran has become a martyrdom-obsessed state run by religious fanatics bent on spreading Shiite Islam throughout the world. Any country that threatens to wipe out other countries, peoples or cultures should not be underestimated nor should the West assume that Iranian ambitions can be ‘contained,’” he wrote.

He concluded on a paranoid note, implying that only imminent military action could stop Iran’s quest to establish a “global caliphate”: “Time is running out, negotiations have proven fruitless, sanctions have yet to be proven effective, and Iran is stalling for time while enriching uranium to weapons-grade quality and closing in on a nuclear weapon, a delivery system, and a nuclear shield under which it intends to establish a global Islamic caliphate under its control. With Iranian Islamic imperialism on the march, we have reached the point of no return in deciding whether or not to allow such a regime to go nuclear.”[3]

FSM associates often voice discredited conspiracy theories, including casting doubt on the birthplace of President Barack Obama and stoking alarm about the spread of “sharia law” in the United States. After Obama’s long-form birth certificate was released in April 2011, for example—long after rumors about the president’s birthplace had originally been discredited—FSM president Carol Tabor said that the document should be “forensically tested” to ensure its authenticity.[4]

FSM has also published numerous commentaries by the Center for Security Policy’s Clare Lopez that have been overtly hostile to Muslims living in the United States. Amid the ginned-up November 2011 controversy over the TLC reality show All-American Muslim, which documented the ordinary lives of Muslim families in suburban Detroit, Lopez contributed a piece to FSM calling the show a “whitewash,” for the apparent reason that none of the characters were terrorists.[5] In another piece the following month, Lopez breathlessly warned that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was coordinating with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to criminalize the criticism of Islam in the United States.[6]

The group's publications have been the subject of heated criticism, in part because of their often-extremist views. A case in point was the August 2007 article, "Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy," written by FSM contributor Philip Atkinson, who wrote: "The simple truth [is] that modern weapons now mean a nation must practice genocide or commit suicide. Israel provides the perfect example. If the Israelis do not raze Iran, the Iranians will fulfill their boast and wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Yet Israel is not popular, and so is denied permission to defend itself. In the same vein, President [George W.] Bush cannot do what is necessary for the survival of Americans. He cannot use the nation's powerful weapons. All he can do is try and discover a result that will be popular with Americans."

Regarding the Iraq War, Atkinson would have preferred using nuclear weapons to defeat Saddam Hussein's regime: "When faced with the possible threat that the Iraqis might be amassing terrible weapons that could be used to slay millions of citizens of Western Civilization, President Bush took the only action prudence demanded and the electorate allowed: he conquered Iraq with an army. … The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. Then there would be little risk or expense and no American army would be left exposed. But if he did this, his cowardly electorate would have instantly ended his term of office, if not his freedom or his life."[7]

Controversy over Nonpartisan Posturing

FSM's public face is Carol Taber, the group's founder, who is also a board member of the rightist Independent Women's Forum. Her appearance on September 28, 2004, during a special segment of Fox News, just weeks before the 2004 presidential elections, helped draw public attention to her group. Claiming that FSM was designed to appeal to a new "crucial target voter," the so-called security moms, Taber said that "focus groups" purportedly organized by FSM had revealed that mothers preferred George W. Bush over Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), largely because Kerry supposedly could not be trusted to ensure their security. She said: "What we found is very interesting, and it favors President Bush, number one. As I said before, the A-number-one concern for these women is the safety and security of their families. Now, President Bush scores very well here because they really do see him as a strong and resolute leader. But they don't see the same thing in John Kerry." Taber then pressed her point: "I'll give you some verbatim quotes that we heard from the focus group to give an idea of what I'm talking about. Some women said about Mr. Kerry, 'I don't trust him.' Some said, 'I don't know what it is about him. I just don't like him.' Some women said, 'He looks sneaky.' We actually heard that a couple of times. Some women said, 'He's too rich to be president.'"[8]

Commenting on the interview, which was presented on Fox's "Special Report with Bret Hume," Media Matters opined: "Carol A. Taber, president of Family Security Matters, presented Bush campaign attacks on Kerry as though they were nonpartisan public opinion data. Taber claimed that married women who once voted Democratic have embraced President George W. Bush for his handling of terrorism but produced no empirical evidence for her claims. In fact, Taber's harsh attacks on Kerry—along with her total lack of credentials as a public opinion or demographics expert—indicate that she is a partisan posing as an impartial analyst."[9]

FSM has been criticized for misleadingly portraying itself as a nonpartisan organization, with the modest goal of providing "Americans like us the tools to become involved citizens and powerful defenders of our homes, our families, and our communities." But, say critics, lurking underneath this carefully crafted image is a radical agenda that is wholly partisan in its support for right-wing Republicans.

In its analysis of Taber's Fox appearance and of FSM, Media Matters pointed to a number of papers on FSM's website featuring titles like "Reckless Disregard: How Liberal Democrats Undercut Our Military, Endanger Our Soldiers, and Jeopardize Our Security"; "Intelligence Failure: How Bill Clinton's National Security Policy Set the Stage for 9/11"; and "Inside the Asylum: Why the United Nations and Old Europe Are Worse Than You Think." FSM, Media Matters concluded, was a "front group" created to promote the Bush administration agenda. FSM's website, replete with links to antiterrorism advice columns such as "It's for Kids Too—Especially Kids," offers a number of clues to its partisan allegiances. In late 2004, Media Matters for America discovered that the phone number listed on FSM's website actually belonged to the Center for Security Policy (CSP), a hardline foreign policy outfit run by former Reagan administration figure Frank Gaffney. (As of January 2012, FSM no longer provides a phone number on its website.)

After exploring the FSM's website in 2006, blogger Steve Clemons concluded that Family Security Matters "seems mostly intent on creating the political foundation for a national security state. They want folks who live in Missoula, Montana; Bartlesville, Oklahoma; Salina, Kansas; and Dubuque, Iowa to really worry that terrorists might be there to mess up their lives—any time, any moment."[10]

Leadership

FSM's board of advisers includes James DeGraffenreid, also a member of CSP's board; Paul Vallely, a conservative radio talk show host; Laura Ingraham, a right-wing commentator with a nationally syndicated radio show; Arthur Waldron, a well-known China hawk associated with the so-called Blue Team, an informal group of defense policy strategists who, prior to 9/11, led the effort to make China the top U.S. security concern; and James Woolsey, the former CIA head who has helped organize a lengthy list of hardline foreign policy advocacy outfits, including Americans for Victory over Terrorism, the Coalition for Democracy in Iran, and the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. Brigitte Gabriel, president of American Congress for Truth, is one of FSM's contributing editors.

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1] Andrew McCarthy, “Islam Is Islam, and That’s It,” FSM, January 24, 2012, http://familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11285/pub_detail.asp.

[2] Ralph Peters, “The Arab World's Endless Failures,” FSM, January 26, 2012, http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11301/pub_detail.asp.

[3] Mark Silverberg, “The Point of No Return,” FSM, January 24, 2012, http://familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11283/pub_detail.asp.

[4] Robert Farley and Angie Drobnic Holan ,“With Obama's birth certificate's release, doubters believe, right?” Tampa Bay Times, April 28, 2011, http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article1166441.ece.

[5] Clare Lopez, “’All-American Muslim’: A Little Taqiyya on the Prairie,” FSM, November 23, 2011, http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.10886/pub_detail.asp.

[6] Clare Lopez, “Criticism of Islam Could Soon be a Crime in America,” FSM, December 18, 2012, http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.10991/pub_detail.asp.

[7] Philip Atkinson, "Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy," Family Security Matters, August 3, 2007, http://www.webcitation.org/5R9ikXAUH.

[8] Media Matters for America, "Fox's 'Security Mom' Expert Spouted Bush-Cheney Talking Points," September 29, 2004, http://mediamatters.org/items/200409290009.

[9] Media Matters for America, "Fox's 'Security Mom' Expert Spouted Bush-Cheney Talking Points," September 29, 2004, http://mediamatters.org/items/200409290009.

[10] Steve Clemons, "National Security for Family—But Especially Kids!!" TPM Café, June 25, 2006, www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/jun/25/national_security_for_families_but_especially_kids.

Share RightWeb

Family Security Matters Résumé

Contact Information

Family Security Matters
2020 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, #298
Washington, DC 20006
Email: EditorialDirector@FamilySecurityMatters.org (for questions and feedback on content), AskWilla@FamilySecurityMatters.org (for other questions).
Website: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/


Founded

2004


Mission Statement (2012)

“Our mission is to inform all Americans, men and women, about the issues surrounding national security; to address their fears about safety and security on a personal, family, community, national and international level; to highlight the connection between individual safety and a strong national defense; to increase civic participation and political responsibility; and to empower all Americans to become proactive defenders of our national security and community safety.”


Leadership (2012)

  • Carol Taber, President
  • Linda Cohen, Exec. Vice President
  • Rosemary P. Sullivan, General Manager
  • Nancy Kennon, Director of Operations
  • W. Thomas Smith Jr., Director, Counterterrorism Research Center


Board of Directors (2012)

  • Carol Taber
  • Amanda Bowman
  • Linda Cohen
  • Dale Lang
  • Edward Taber, III


Board of Advisors (2012)

  • Monica Crowley
  • Susan Davis
  • James DeGraffenreid
  • Laura Ingraham
  • Dale Lang
  • John LeBoutillier
  • Maria Estela Lopez de Rios
  • Shirley Lord
  • Abby Moffat
  • Eugene Rogers
  • Thor Ronay
  • Thomas Smith
  • Latanya Sweeney
  • Frank Swain
  • Paul Vallely
  • Larry Boyd
  • Arthur Waldron
  • James Woolsey

Related:

Family Security Matters News Feed

Sen. Warren: Every family deserves high-quality child care - Alabama's News LeaderStung by criticism, Broward School Board approves new security measures - Sun SentinelMeghan Markle's baby shower paid for by friends - ITV NewsTrump singled out Dan Coats in morning rant about intelligence community - CNNTreasury lifts sanctions against 3 Russian companies - Seymour TribuneTrustee named in case of closed Washington County Hospital - WITNTrump picks ambassador to Canada for UN post - Tucson News NowUpdate on the latest news, sports, business and entertainment at 6:20 am EST - WTOPAmid its quindecinnial anniversary of publishing anti-Muslim hate, Family Security Matters bids farewell - Southern Poverty Law CenterTunisia Claims 1000 ISIS Recruits Have Returned Home - The Media LineAfter attacking media and law enforcement, Netanyahu moves to next target - HaaretzHouse Dems want Treasury records on Russian sanctions move - Star TribuneTrump appointee 'overruled' rejection of Jared Kushner's top security clearance - The GuardianSedwill and May lead tributes after national security chief Charles Farr dies - Civil Service WorldAuthor: Shooting changed Reagan, showed his character - Peoria Journal StarSamsung Galaxy S10e, Galaxy S10, and Galaxy S10+ first impressions - ITBusiness.caDR Congo: Tshisekedi takes office, but Kabila's legacy casts long shadow - FRANCE 24 EnglishWomen will surround Trump at State of the Union address - WJAC JohnstownJohn O. Marsh Jr., presidential ‘conscience’ and Army secretary, dies at 92 - Washington PostAnti Defamation League is a threat to Jews - Weekly Blitz

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

François Nicoullaud, the former French ambassador to Iran, discusses the ups and downs of Iran-France relations and the new US sanctions.


Effective alliances require that powerful states shoulder a far larger share of the alliance maintenance costs than other states, a premise that Donald Trump rejects.


The new imbroglio over the INF treaty does not mean a revival of the old Cold War practice of nuclear deterrence. However, it does reveal the inability of the West and Russia to find a way to deal with the latter’s inevitable return to the ranks of major powers, a need that was obvious even at the time the USSR collapsed.


As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump appeared to recognize the obvious problem of the revolving door. But as the appointment of Patrick Shanahan, who spent 30 years at Boeing, as the Trump administration’s acting secretary of defense reveals, little has changed. America is indeed great again, if you happen to be one of those lucky enough to be moving back and forth between plum jobs in the Pentagon and the weapons industry.


Domestic troubles, declining popularity, and a decidedly hawkish anti-Iran foreign policy team may combine to make the perfect storm that pushes Donald Trump to pull the United States into a new war in the Middle East.


The same calculus that brought Iran and world powers to make a deal and has led remaining JCPOA signatories to preserve it without the U.S. still holds: the alternatives to this agreement – a race between sanctions and centrifuges that could culminate in Iran obtaining the bomb or being bombed – would be much worse.


With Bolton and Pompeo by his side and Mattis departed, Trump may well go with his gut and attack Iran militarily. He’ll be encouraged in this delusion by Israel and Saudi Arabia. He’ll of course be looking for some way to distract the media and the American public. And he won’t care about the consequences.


RightWeb
share