Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (formerly the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya) is a Freedom House initiative that bills itself as the ”only private, nongovernmental organization in North America exclusively dedicated to promoting the peaceful resolution of the Russo-Chechen war."[1] According to Freedom House, ACPC “coordinates with an international network of activists, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights and rule of law, to monitor the upward trend of violence in the region, and to promote peace and stability in the North Caucasus.”[2] As of early 2013, the committee appeared to be largely defunct.

Founded in 1999 by U.S. liberal hawks and neoconservatives primarily interested in using the conflict in Chechnya to press an anti-Russian agenda, the ACPC eventually updated its name and broadened its focus after conflicts erupted between Russia and other parts of the Caucasus, including Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, and North Ossetia.[3]

In early 2013, the committee attracted attention when the suspects in the April 2013 Boston marathon bombing were identified as ethnic Chechens. Although early reports did not indicate that the suspects were driven by Chechen nationalist motivations, some writers questioned whether the FBI had improperly ignored warnings from Russian authorities that one of the alleged bombers had met repeatedly with a suspected terrorist leader in Dagestan.

A writer for Antiwar.com suggested that groups like ACPC had promulgated an anti-Russian bias in Washington that precluded serious consideration of Russian warnings about potential Chechen terrorists. "How did [the bombers] manage to evade the multi-billion dollar 'security apparatus, which was set up with so much fanfare after 9/11? The answer is to be found in the manipulations and odorous alliances dictated by our interventionist foreign policy, a throwback to the cold war era, which has deemed Russia an enemy and the Chechens the Good Guys.”[4]

Noting the neoconservative slant of ACPC’s membership, David Weigel of Slate.com ironically remarked shortly after the Boston bombings that “even neocons were for Chechens before they were against them.” According to Weigel, the ACPC was formed after the start of the second Chechen war in 1999 in an effort to paint Russia as a threat by publicizing atrocities committed by Russian forces in the region.[5] After 9/11, when Putin “presented himself as a natural ally who understood exactly what Americans were going through,” ACPC and colleagues in like-minded journals such as the Weekly Standard warned that U.S. support for Russia’s war in Chechnya would, as one writer put it, jeopardize “our new effort to gain Muslim allies and supporters.”[6]

Commented Weigel: “Gaining Muslim allies—easy to forget, but that was what neoconservatives aspired to after 9/11. Agitating for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and announcing solidarity with non-radicalized Chechens were simultaneous causes. The American Committee had its own specific successes, like an August 2002 peace summit (on the very neutral turf of Lichtenstein). Occasionally these whack-a-mole D.C. ‘letterhead’ groups, the ones that start up to agitate for a cause from a think tank’s spare rooms, score some wins. … The American Committee’s long-term win was preventing Putin from credibly describing everything he did as just another piece of the ‘global war on terror.’”[7]

Shortly after the Boston attack, ubiquitous neoconservative pundit and ACPC supporter Bill Kristol appeared on a conservative Boston-area radio program to discuss U.S.-Russian ties in light of the bombing. Although Kristol conceded that the Russian authorities had offered the United States "a pretty detailed dossier of [bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev's] contacts," he also mused that the Russians are "trying to get us to be suspicious of every Chechen who came to the U.S., especially of everyone who came as a political refugee."[8]

ACPC's activities have included organizing public education programs, developing policy recommendations for lawmakers, and collaborating with activists, journalists, and scholars. It also works closely with a range of nongovernmental policy groups and think tanks, including the American Enterprise Institute and the Jamestown Foundation. At one time, the committee distributed a weekly email news service and newsletter. ACPC's web site contains a news archive, policy papers relating to the U.S. role in the Caucasus, and academic papers, maps, and photos of the conflict.

Glen Howard, the president of the Jamestown Foundation, was ACPC's last listed executive director.[9] Howard previously worked as a military analyst for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a high-tech defense contractor, and has served as a consultant for the Department of Defense, National Intelligence Council, and "major oil companies operating in Central Asia and the Middle East."[10]

The publications of Howard’s two organizations often overlap. For example, the Jamestown Foundation produces North Caucasus Weekly, an ezine that features contributions by ACPC board members.[11] Both groups also work extensively with former Soviet defectors and Chechen dissidents.

As of 2013, ACPC's website did not list its membership or board of directors. But in its American Committee for Peace in Chechnya formation, its board of directors was co-chaired by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., Steven J. Solarz, and the late Max Kampelman. The committee's more than 100 listed members reflected a wide political spectrum, including such figures as Richard Gere, Morton Ambramowitz, and Geraldine Ferraro. However, membership was overwhelmingly hawkish, and many high-profile neoconservatives, some associated with the Project for the New American Century, featured on its membership rolls, including Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Elliott Abrams, Midge Decter, William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, and James Woolsey, among others.[12]

ACPC supported the Chechen rebel movement, apparently as a strategy to weaken Russia and establish better U.S. ties in a region of increasing geopolitical value, which has vast, unexploited natural resource reserves including rich oil, gas, and hard mineral deposits.[13]


In 2002-2003, Freedom House received $275,000 for ACPC from the Smith Richardson Foundation.[14]


Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.


[1] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about.htm

[2] Freedom House,  “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://www.freedomhouse.org/program/russia-north-caucus

[3] American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about

[4] Justin Raimondo, "The Russians Warned Us – Why Didn’t We Listen?" Antiwar.com, April 24, 2013, http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/04/23/the-russians-warned-us-why-didnt-we-listen/.

[5] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html

[6] Quoted byin David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

[7] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html

[8] Quoted in David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

[9] See ACPC, "About," archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050404123934/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_staff.htm.

[10] See Jamestown Foundation, "Staff," http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/staff/.

[11] The Jamestown Foundation, “North Caucasus Analysis,” http://www.jamestown.org/programs/nca/

[12] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “Members,” archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050407171752/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.

[13] The Jamestown Foundation, Chechnya Weekly for March 9, 16, and 23, 2005, http://www.jamestown.org/publications_view.php?publication_id=1.

[14] Media Transparency, “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Freedom_House/funders

Share RightWeb

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus Résumé


Contact Information

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus
Freedom House
1301 Connecticut Ave., NW, Floor 6
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 296-5101
Email: acpc@peaceinthecaucasus.org



About (as of 2013)

"The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), a project of Freedom House, coordinates with an international network of human rights and democracy advocates, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights in the North Caucasus. ACPC is dedicated to monitoring developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications for security, stability and the human rights situation. In the aftermath of the two Chechen Wars and in the face of the ongoing violence across the region, ACPC strives to ensure access to information from the North Caucasus for the international policymaking and NGO community."

Selected Principals (as of 2013)


American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus News Feed

Syria, Then and Now: Liberated of Western-backed Terrorism - Mintpress NewsVafa Guluzade: Kissinger of the Caucasus - TsarizmA Regime Conceals Its Erasure of Indigenous Armenian Culture - HyperallergicUW-Stout professor writes book on Pulitzer winner - Chippewa HeraldUN, West Call On Russia To Stop Syria From Blocking Peace Effort - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLibertyU.S. Policy Toward the South Caucasus: Take Three - Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceWelcome to the Almost-Country of Abkhazia - Pacific StandardUN Syria Envoy Calls Astana Talks On Syria 'Missed Opportunity' - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLibertyWill the war in Russia's North Caucasus ever end? - Open DemocracyArmenia's New President Headlines Capitol Hill Centennial of US-Armenia Relations - Armenian WeeklySenate Committee Approves U.S. Ambassador to Armenia and Azerbaijan Nominees - Asbarez Armenian NewsUN Envoy For Syria Stepping Down As Prospects For Peace Deal Wither - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLibertyKhashoggi, the Hudaydah Offensive and Prospects for Peace in Yemen - The Jamestown FoundationUS in the Caucasus: Beat the Russians at their own game | TheHill - The HillU.S. Secretary Of State Says Washington Focused On Ties With Latin America - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLibertySen. Menendez Delays Senate Confirmation of US Ambassador to Azerbaijan - Armenian WeeklyGermany's Merkel Set To Visit Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLibertyFollowing Bolton's Call for Increased US Arms Sales to Azerbaijan, Ambassador Vote Postponed - Armenian WeeklyMenendez Pledges to Work with Envoy to Armenia on Securing 'An Honest Acknowledgement of Genocide' - Asbarez Armenian NewsAnti-Israel Indoctrination Continues In Newton Public High School - Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

François Nicoullaud, the former French ambassador to Iran, discusses the ups and downs of Iran-France relations and the new US sanctions.

Effective alliances require that powerful states shoulder a far larger share of the alliance maintenance costs than other states, a premise that Donald Trump rejects.

The new imbroglio over the INF treaty does not mean a revival of the old Cold War practice of nuclear deterrence. However, it does reveal the inability of the West and Russia to find a way to deal with the latter’s inevitable return to the ranks of major powers, a need that was obvious even at the time the USSR collapsed.

As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump appeared to recognize the obvious problem of the revolving door. But as the appointment of Patrick Shanahan, who spent 30 years at Boeing, as the Trump administration’s acting secretary of defense reveals, little has changed. America is indeed great again, if you happen to be one of those lucky enough to be moving back and forth between plum jobs in the Pentagon and the weapons industry.

Domestic troubles, declining popularity, and a decidedly hawkish anti-Iran foreign policy team may combine to make the perfect storm that pushes Donald Trump to pull the United States into a new war in the Middle East.

The same calculus that brought Iran and world powers to make a deal and has led remaining JCPOA signatories to preserve it without the U.S. still holds: the alternatives to this agreement – a race between sanctions and centrifuges that could culminate in Iran obtaining the bomb or being bombed – would be much worse.

With Bolton and Pompeo by his side and Mattis departed, Trump may well go with his gut and attack Iran militarily. He’ll be encouraged in this delusion by Israel and Saudi Arabia. He’ll of course be looking for some way to distract the media and the American public. And he won’t care about the consequences.