Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (formerly the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya) is a Freedom House initiative that bills itself as the ”only private, nongovernmental organization in North America exclusively dedicated to promoting the peaceful resolution of the Russo-Chechen war."[1] According to Freedom House, ACPC “coordinates with an international network of activists, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights and rule of law, to monitor the upward trend of violence in the region, and to promote peace and stability in the North Caucasus.”[2] As of early 2013, the committee appeared to be largely defunct.

Founded in 1999 by U.S. liberal hawks and neoconservatives primarily interested in using the conflict in Chechnya to press an anti-Russian agenda, the ACPC eventually updated its name and broadened its focus after conflicts erupted between Russia and other parts of the Caucasus, including Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, and North Ossetia.[3]

In early 2013, the committee attracted attention when the suspects in the April 2013 Boston marathon bombing were identified as ethnic Chechens. Although early reports did not indicate that the suspects were driven by Chechen nationalist motivations, some writers questioned whether the FBI had improperly ignored warnings from Russian authorities that one of the alleged bombers had met repeatedly with a suspected terrorist leader in Dagestan.

A writer for Antiwar.com suggested that groups like ACPC had promulgated an anti-Russian bias in Washington that precluded serious consideration of Russian warnings about potential Chechen terrorists. "How did [the bombers] manage to evade the multi-billion dollar 'security apparatus, which was set up with so much fanfare after 9/11? The answer is to be found in the manipulations and odorous alliances dictated by our interventionist foreign policy, a throwback to the cold war era, which has deemed Russia an enemy and the Chechens the Good Guys.”[4]

Noting the neoconservative slant of ACPC’s membership, David Weigel of Slate.com ironically remarked shortly after the Boston bombings that “even neocons were for Chechens before they were against them.” According to Weigel, the ACPC was formed after the start of the second Chechen war in 1999 in an effort to paint Russia as a threat by publicizing atrocities committed by Russian forces in the region.[5] After 9/11, when Putin “presented himself as a natural ally who understood exactly what Americans were going through,” ACPC and colleagues in like-minded journals such as the Weekly Standard warned that U.S. support for Russia’s war in Chechnya would, as one writer put it, jeopardize “our new effort to gain Muslim allies and supporters.”[6]

Commented Weigel: “Gaining Muslim allies—easy to forget, but that was what neoconservatives aspired to after 9/11. Agitating for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and announcing solidarity with non-radicalized Chechens were simultaneous causes. The American Committee had its own specific successes, like an August 2002 peace summit (on the very neutral turf of Lichtenstein). Occasionally these whack-a-mole D.C. ‘letterhead’ groups, the ones that start up to agitate for a cause from a think tank’s spare rooms, score some wins. … The American Committee’s long-term win was preventing Putin from credibly describing everything he did as just another piece of the ‘global war on terror.’”[7]

Shortly after the Boston attack, ubiquitous neoconservative pundit and ACPC supporter Bill Kristol appeared on a conservative Boston-area radio program to discuss U.S.-Russian ties in light of the bombing. Although Kristol conceded that the Russian authorities had offered the United States "a pretty detailed dossier of [bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev's] contacts," he also mused that the Russians are "trying to get us to be suspicious of every Chechen who came to the U.S., especially of everyone who came as a political refugee."[8]

ACPC's activities have included organizing public education programs, developing policy recommendations for lawmakers, and collaborating with activists, journalists, and scholars. It also works closely with a range of nongovernmental policy groups and think tanks, including the American Enterprise Institute and the Jamestown Foundation. At one time, the committee distributed a weekly email news service and newsletter. ACPC's web site contains a news archive, policy papers relating to the U.S. role in the Caucasus, and academic papers, maps, and photos of the conflict.

Glen Howard, the president of the Jamestown Foundation, was ACPC's last listed executive director.[9] Howard previously worked as a military analyst for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a high-tech defense contractor, and has served as a consultant for the Department of Defense, National Intelligence Council, and "major oil companies operating in Central Asia and the Middle East."[10]

The publications of Howard’s two organizations often overlap. For example, the Jamestown Foundation produces North Caucasus Weekly, an ezine that features contributions by ACPC board members.[11] Both groups also work extensively with former Soviet defectors and Chechen dissidents.

As of 2013, ACPC's website did not list its membership or board of directors. But in its American Committee for Peace in Chechnya formation, its board of directors was co-chaired by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., Steven J. Solarz, and the late Max Kampelman. The committee's more than 100 listed members reflected a wide political spectrum, including such figures as Richard Gere, Morton Ambramowitz, and Geraldine Ferraro. However, membership was overwhelmingly hawkish, and many high-profile neoconservatives, some associated with the Project for the New American Century, featured on its membership rolls, including Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Elliott Abrams, Midge Decter, William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, and James Woolsey, among others.[12]

ACPC supported the Chechen rebel movement, apparently as a strategy to weaken Russia and establish better U.S. ties in a region of increasing geopolitical value, which has vast, unexploited natural resource reserves including rich oil, gas, and hard mineral deposits.[13]

Funding

In 2002-2003, Freedom House received $275,000 for ACPC from the Smith Richardson Foundation.[14]

 

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources


[1] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about.htm



[2] Freedom House,  “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://www.freedomhouse.org/program/russia-north-caucus



[3] American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about



[4] Justin Raimondo, "The Russians Warned Us – Why Didn’t We Listen?" Antiwar.com, April 24, 2013, http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/04/23/the-russians-warned-us-why-didnt-we-listen/.



[5] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html



[6] Quoted byin David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.



[7] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html



[8] Quoted in David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.



[9] See ACPC, "About," archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050404123934/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_staff.htm.



[10] See Jamestown Foundation, "Staff," http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/staff/.



[11] The Jamestown Foundation, “North Caucasus Analysis,” http://www.jamestown.org/programs/nca/



[12] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “Members,” archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050407171752/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.



[13] The Jamestown Foundation, Chechnya Weekly for March 9, 16, and 23, 2005, http://www.jamestown.org/publications_view.php?publication_id=1.



[14] Media Transparency, “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Freedom_House/funders


Share RightWeb

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus Résumé


 



Contact Information



The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus

Freedom House

1301 Connecticut Ave., NW, Floor 6

Washington, DC 20036

Phone: (202) 296-5101

Email: acpc@peaceinthecaucasus.org





Founded



1999





About (as of 2013)



"The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), a project of Freedom House, coordinates with an international network of human rights and democracy advocates, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights in the North Caucasus. ACPC is dedicated to monitoring developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications for security, stability and the human rights situation. In the aftermath of the two Chechen Wars and in the face of the ongoing violence across the region, ACPC strives to ensure access to information from the North Caucasus for the international policymaking and NGO community."





Selected Principals (as of 2013)


Related:

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Trumpian new regional order in the Middle East is predicated on strongman rule, disregard for human rights, Sunni primacy over Iran and other Shia centers of power, continued military support for pro-American warring parties regardless of the unlawfulness of such wars, and Israeli hegemony.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A comparison of U.S. nuclear diplomacy with Iran and the current version with North Korea puts the former in a good light and makes the latter look disappointing. Those with an interest in curbing the dangers of proliferating nuclear weapons should hope that the North Korea picture will improve with time. But whether it does or not, the process has put into perspective how badly mistaken was the Trump administration’s trashing of the Iran nuclear agreement.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Numerous high profile Trump administration officials maintain close ties with anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists. In today’s America, disparaging Islam is acceptable in ways that disparaging other religions is not. Given the continuing well-funded campaigns by the Islamophobes and continuing support from their enablers in the Trump administration, starting with the president himself, it seems unlikely that this trend will be reversed any time soon.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Trump administration’s nuclear proliferation policy is now in meltdown, one which no threat of “steely resolve”—in Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s words—will easily contain. It is hemorrhaging in part because the administration has yet to forge a strategy that consistently and credibly signals a feasible bottom line that includes living with—rather than destroying—regimes it despises or fears. Political leaders on both sides of the aisle must call for a new model that has some reasonable hope of restraining America’s foes and bringing security to its Middle East allies.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Congressional midterm elections are just months away and another presidential election already looms. Who will be the political leader with the courage and presence of mind to declare: “Enough! Stop this madness!” Man or woman, straight or gay, black, brown, or white, that person will deserve the nation’s gratitude and the support of the electorate. Until that occurs, however, the American penchant for war will stretch on toward infinity.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

To bolster the president’s arguments for cutting back immigration, the administration recently released a fear-mongering report about future terrorist threats. Among the potential threats: a Sudanese national who, in 2016, “pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS”; an Uzbek who “posted a threat on an Uzbek-language website to kill President Obama in an act of martyrdom on behalf of ISIS”; a Syrian who, in a plea agreement, “admitted that he knew a member of ISIS and that while in Syria he participated in a battle against the Syrian regime, including shooting at others, in coordination with Al Nusrah,” an al-Qaeda offshoot.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The recent appointment of purveyors of anti-Muslim rhetoric to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom exposes the cynical approach Republicans have taken in promoting religious freedom.


RightWeb
share