Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (formerly the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya) is a Freedom House initiative that bills itself as the ”only private, nongovernmental organization in North America exclusively dedicated to promoting the peaceful resolution of the Russo-Chechen war."[1] According to Freedom House, ACPC “coordinates with an international network of activists, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights and rule of law, to monitor the upward trend of violence in the region, and to promote peace and stability in the North Caucasus.”[2] As of early 2013, the committee appeared to be largely defunct.

Founded in 1999 by U.S. liberal hawks and neoconservatives primarily interested in using the conflict in Chechnya to press an anti-Russian agenda, the ACPC eventually updated its name and broadened its focus after conflicts erupted between Russia and other parts of the Caucasus, including Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, and North Ossetia.[3]

In early 2013, the committee attracted attention when the suspects in the April 2013 Boston marathon bombing were identified as ethnic Chechens. Although early reports did not indicate that the suspects were driven by Chechen nationalist motivations, some writers questioned whether the FBI had improperly ignored warnings from Russian authorities that one of the alleged bombers had met repeatedly with a suspected terrorist leader in Dagestan.

A writer for Antiwar.com suggested that groups like ACPC had promulgated an anti-Russian bias in Washington that precluded serious consideration of Russian warnings about potential Chechen terrorists. "How did [the bombers] manage to evade the multi-billion dollar 'security apparatus, which was set up with so much fanfare after 9/11? The answer is to be found in the manipulations and odorous alliances dictated by our interventionist foreign policy, a throwback to the cold war era, which has deemed Russia an enemy and the Chechens the Good Guys.”[4]

Noting the neoconservative slant of ACPC’s membership, David Weigel of Slate.com ironically remarked shortly after the Boston bombings that “even neocons were for Chechens before they were against them.” According to Weigel, the ACPC was formed after the start of the second Chechen war in 1999 in an effort to paint Russia as a threat by publicizing atrocities committed by Russian forces in the region.[5] After 9/11, when Putin “presented himself as a natural ally who understood exactly what Americans were going through,” ACPC and colleagues in like-minded journals such as the Weekly Standard warned that U.S. support for Russia’s war in Chechnya would, as one writer put it, jeopardize “our new effort to gain Muslim allies and supporters.”[6]

Commented Weigel: “Gaining Muslim allies—easy to forget, but that was what neoconservatives aspired to after 9/11. Agitating for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and announcing solidarity with non-radicalized Chechens were simultaneous causes. The American Committee had its own specific successes, like an August 2002 peace summit (on the very neutral turf of Lichtenstein). Occasionally these whack-a-mole D.C. ‘letterhead’ groups, the ones that start up to agitate for a cause from a think tank’s spare rooms, score some wins. … The American Committee’s long-term win was preventing Putin from credibly describing everything he did as just another piece of the ‘global war on terror.’”[7]

Shortly after the Boston attack, ubiquitous neoconservative pundit and ACPC supporter Bill Kristol appeared on a conservative Boston-area radio program to discuss U.S.-Russian ties in light of the bombing. Although Kristol conceded that the Russian authorities had offered the United States "a pretty detailed dossier of [bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev's] contacts," he also mused that the Russians are "trying to get us to be suspicious of every Chechen who came to the U.S., especially of everyone who came as a political refugee."[8]

ACPC's activities have included organizing public education programs, developing policy recommendations for lawmakers, and collaborating with activists, journalists, and scholars. It also works closely with a range of nongovernmental policy groups and think tanks, including the American Enterprise Institute and the Jamestown Foundation. At one time, the committee distributed a weekly email news service and newsletter. ACPC's web site contains a news archive, policy papers relating to the U.S. role in the Caucasus, and academic papers, maps, and photos of the conflict.

Glen Howard, the president of the Jamestown Foundation, was ACPC's last listed executive director.[9] Howard previously worked as a military analyst for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a high-tech defense contractor, and has served as a consultant for the Department of Defense, National Intelligence Council, and "major oil companies operating in Central Asia and the Middle East."[10]

The publications of Howard’s two organizations often overlap. For example, the Jamestown Foundation produces North Caucasus Weekly, an ezine that features contributions by ACPC board members.[11] Both groups also work extensively with former Soviet defectors and Chechen dissidents.

As of 2013, ACPC's website did not list its membership or board of directors. But in its American Committee for Peace in Chechnya formation, its board of directors was co-chaired by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., Steven J. Solarz, and the late Max Kampelman. The committee's more than 100 listed members reflected a wide political spectrum, including such figures as Richard Gere, Morton Ambramowitz, and Geraldine Ferraro. However, membership was overwhelmingly hawkish, and many high-profile neoconservatives, some associated with the Project for the New American Century, featured on its membership rolls, including Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Elliott Abrams, Midge Decter, William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, and James Woolsey, among others.[12]

ACPC supported the Chechen rebel movement, apparently as a strategy to weaken Russia and establish better U.S. ties in a region of increasing geopolitical value, which has vast, unexploited natural resource reserves including rich oil, gas, and hard mineral deposits.[13]

Funding

In 2002-2003, Freedom House received $275,000 for ACPC from the Smith Richardson Foundation.[14]

 

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about.htm

[2] Freedom House,  “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://www.freedomhouse.org/program/russia-north-caucus

[3] American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about

[4] Justin Raimondo, "The Russians Warned Us – Why Didn’t We Listen?" Antiwar.com, April 24, 2013, http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/04/23/the-russians-warned-us-why-didnt-we-listen/.

[5] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html

[6] Quoted byin David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

[7] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html

[8] Quoted in David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

[9] See ACPC, "About," archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050404123934/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_staff.htm.

[10] See Jamestown Foundation, "Staff," http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/staff/.

[11] The Jamestown Foundation, “North Caucasus Analysis,” http://www.jamestown.org/programs/nca/

[12] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “Members,” archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050407171752/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.

[13] The Jamestown Foundation, Chechnya Weekly for March 9, 16, and 23, 2005, http://www.jamestown.org/publications_view.php?publication_id=1.

[14] Media Transparency, “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Freedom_House/funders

Share RightWeb

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus Résumé

 

Contact Information

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus
Freedom House
1301 Connecticut Ave., NW, Floor 6
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 296-5101
Email: acpc@peaceinthecaucasus.org


Founded

1999


About (as of 2013)

"The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), a project of Freedom House, coordinates with an international network of human rights and democracy advocates, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights in the North Caucasus. ACPC is dedicated to monitoring developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications for security, stability and the human rights situation. In the aftermath of the two Chechen Wars and in the face of the ongoing violence across the region, ACPC strives to ensure access to information from the North Caucasus for the international policymaking and NGO community."


Selected Principals (as of 2013)

Related:

American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus News Feed

Russia This Week – Focus On New World Order – April 17, 2019 - Middle East Media Research InstituteGeorgia Stands With Azerbaijan: Strategic Partnership In The South Caucasus - Modern DiplomacyNATO Is Not Dying. It's a Zombie. - The National Interest OnlineArmenia's Global Outreach - The Armenian Mirror-SpectatorEuroskeptic, populist parties form alliance in Europe - WTHRPashinyan-Aliyev Meeting: Positive, but Inconclusive - Armenian WeeklyThe Pilgrimage of Malcolm Muggeridge - A Magazine of American CultureThe Daily 202: Trump keeps pushing legal boundaries — and 10 other takeaways from Kirstjen Nielsen's ouster - The Washington Post'Ouch' moments discomfit, challenge sisters at convocation on racism - Global Sisters ReportRussia This Week – April 11, 2019 - Middle East Media Research InstituteRussia This Week – April 3, 2019 - Middle East Media Research Institute35 glimpses at Lemon Grove - San Diego ReaderACROSS AMERICA BRIEFS FOR MARCH 24 - The Philadelphia TribuneEurasia's Great Game and the Future of the China-Russia Alliance - Modern DiplomacyForm PX14A6G NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP Filed by: Tri-State Coalition for Responsible Investment - StreetInsider.comArmenia and Azerbaijan exploring parameters of “peace” - EurasianetRussians Need to Question their Foreign Policy - Modern DiplomacyRussia in Review, March 22-29, 2019 - Russia MattersThe Latest: Iran wants US Mideast forces labeled 'terrorist' - WTHRWhen They Want War, India and Pakistan Will Always Have Kashmir - The Daily Beast

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The new government will, once again, be the most right wing in Israel’s history. But this time, the length of the new government’s tenure will depend more on Netanyahu’s legal troubles than on the political dynamics of the coalition.


Given such a dismal U.S. record on non-proliferation, why should North Korea trust U.S. promises of future sanctions relief and security guarantees in exchange for denuclearization? If anything, the case of the JCPOA has demonstrated that regardless of its pledges the United States can reinstate sanctions and even bully private multinational companies to divest from Iran.


As Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Saudi crown prince and de facto ruler Mohammad bin Salman clamor for a war against Iran, they seem to have conveniently forgotten the destruction and mayhem wrought by the American invasion of Iraq 16 years ago.


President Trump’s announcement that he would recognise Israeli sovereignty over the western part of the Golan Heights destroys the negotiating basis for any future peace between Israel and Syria. It also lays the groundwork for a return to a world without territorial integrity for smaller, weaker countries.


The Senate on Wednesday passed a measure mandating the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Saudi/UAE-led war against Houthi rebels in Yemen. The vote marks the first time since the War Powers Act of 1973 became law that both chambers of Congress have directed the president to withdraw American forces from a conflict.


The Trump administration’s failed “maximum pressure” approach to Iran and North Korea begs the question what the US president’s true objectives are and what options he is left with should the policy ultimately fail.


In the United States, it’s possible to debate any and every policy, domestic and foreign, except for unquestioning support for Israel. That, apparently, is Ilhan Omar’s chief sin.


RightWeb
share