Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Project on Transitional Democracies

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The Project on Transitional Democracies (PTD), a successor group to the U.S. Committee on NATO, aims to push democratic reforms in post-Soviet countries. Founded by long-standing Republican Party operative Bruce Jackson, the PTD describes itself in tax documents as a “micro-organization which concentrates exclusively on democratic change and societal transformation in the post-Soviet and post-Yugoslav world. We refer to this project as the Project on the Frontiers of Freedom or, alternatively, the Project on Europe’s East.”[1]

Formerly led by a cadre of neoconservative-aligned policy activists, including Randy Scheunemann and Julie Finley, PTD appeared to function largely as a vehicle for the work of its director, Jackson, as of 2010. Tax documents from 2009 listed Jackson as the organization’s only paid employee. It had two unpaid employees at that time: Irina Krasovskaya (treasurer) and Paige Reffe (secretary).[2]

Jackson is perhaps best known for his role in founding the now-defunct Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, an advocacy group that helped build public support for invading Iraq after the 9/11 attacks. He also helped found the U.S. Committee on NATO; served as advisor to the American Enterprise Institute and Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy; was a director of the Project for the New American Century; and was a member of a now-defunct Freedom House program called the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya.

A former defense industry executive, Jackson stepped down from his position as vice president at Lockheed Martin in 2002 to focus on the Project on Transitional Democracies. In his capacity as director of PTD, Jackson has lectured on the relationships of the Balkans and other former Soviet republics with the United States and NATO at domestic and international think tanks. 

He’s also spoken to the press on these issues. In November 2010, an Armenian news agency interviewed Jackson about a possible U.S. on the Armenian genocide. The news agency, ARMINFO, paraphrased Jackson’s response, reporting, “Jackson said that after an intense election, the leaders of both [U.S] parties will be reluctant to engage in international activism, such as recognizing that World War I era killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide. The incoming House Republican generally believe that passing an Armenian resolution in not the foreign policy of the United States.”[3]

Russia has long been a target of PTD activism. In 2006, the project released an “Open Letter to G7 Heads of State” in advance of the G8 meeting in St. Petersburg, stating that Russia was moving “in the wrong direction” with its increasingly authoritarian form of government. It urged them to put Vladimir Putin “on notice that Russia’s current domestic and foreign policies are unacceptable to its neighbors, to the international community and to many of its own citizens.”[4] The letter also recommended the revocation of Russia’s membership to the then-G8 if it refused to comply.[5]

According to the 2009 Form 990, the Project on Transitional Democracies received nearly $430,000 that year in contributions and grants, but does not list the sources of revenue.[6]

According to Media Matters Action Network, from 2003-2007 PTD received a combined total of nearly $500,000 from three conservative foundations: the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the Smith Richardson Foundation, and the William H. Donner Foundation.[7]

The Smith Richardson Foundation grants included one in 2005 grant of $75,000 for the “Frontiers of Freedom” project, so that Jackson could “develop strategies to advance democratic and free-market reforms in Eastern and Central Europe and to integrate those countries into Western institutions. The project will analyze obstacles to reform and integration and provide the policy makers of these countries with recommendations for accelerating these processes.” A 2004 grant of $54,400 for the “Belarus: Europe's Next Flashpoint?” project had Arkady Cherepansky and Rodger Potocki examining the “political and economic trends in Belarus. They will convene a working group to assess the level of political repression and economic decline in Belarus and develop strategies to encourage political change and the integration of Belarus into the West.” Both projects’ findings were to be published.[8]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources


[1]PTD’s Form 990s are available on Guidestar, http://www2.guidestar.org/.



[2]PTD’s Form 990s are available on Guidestar, http://www2.guidestar.org/.



[3]ARMINFO, “Passing an Armenian Resolution Is Not the Foreign Policy of the United States, American Politician Thinks,” November 15, 2010.



[4]PRNewswire, “The Project on Transitional Democracies Releases Open Letter to G7 Heads of State on Democracy in Russia,”PRNewswire.com, http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-project-on-transitional-democracies-releases-open-letter-to-g7-heads-of-state-on-democracy-in-russia-55963732.html.



[5]PRNewswire, “The Project on Transitional Democracies Releases Open Letter to G7 Heads of State on Democracy in Russia,”PRNewswire.com, http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-project-on-transitional-democracies-releases-open-letter-to-g7-heads-of-state-on-democracy-in-russia-55963732.html.



[6]PTD’s Form 990s are available on Guidestar, http://www2.guidestar.org/.



[7]Media Matters Action Network, “Conservative Transparency: Project on Transitional Democracies,” Media Matters, http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Project_on_Transitional_Democracies/funders.



[8]Media Matters Action NetworkMediatransparency, “Project on Transitional Democracies,” http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Project_on_Transitional_Democracies/funders.


Share RightWeb

Project on Transitional Democracies Résumé


Contact Information



Project on Transitional Democracies

3312 Rowland Place, NW

Washington, DC 20008

Phone: 202-986-1949



 



Founded



2002



 



About



“The Project on Transitional Democracies has been organized to exploit the opportunities to accelerate democratic reform and integration which we believe will exist in the broader Euro-Atlantic region over the next decade. The Project is a multi-year endeavor aimed at accelerating the pace of reform in Europe's post-1989 democracies and advancing the date for the integration of these democracies into the institutions of the Euro-Atlantic.”

 



Selected Principals


Related:

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The Trumpian new regional order in the Middle East is predicated on strongman rule, disregard for human rights, Sunni primacy over Iran and other Shia centers of power, continued military support for pro-American warring parties regardless of the unlawfulness of such wars, and Israeli hegemony.


A comparison of U.S. nuclear diplomacy with Iran and the current version with North Korea puts the former in a good light and makes the latter look disappointing. Those with an interest in curbing the dangers of proliferating nuclear weapons should hope that the North Korea picture will improve with time. But whether it does or not, the process has put into perspective how badly mistaken was the Trump administration’s trashing of the Iran nuclear agreement.


Numerous high profile Trump administration officials maintain close ties with anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists. In today’s America, disparaging Islam is acceptable in ways that disparaging other religions is not. Given the continuing well-funded campaigns by the Islamophobes and continuing support from their enablers in the Trump administration, starting with the president himself, it seems unlikely that this trend will be reversed any time soon.


The Trump administration’s nuclear proliferation policy is now in meltdown, one which no threat of “steely resolve”—in Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s words—will easily contain. It is hemorrhaging in part because the administration has yet to forge a strategy that consistently and credibly signals a feasible bottom line that includes living with—rather than destroying—regimes it despises or fears. Political leaders on both sides of the aisle must call for a new model that has some reasonable hope of restraining America’s foes and bringing security to its Middle East allies.


Congressional midterm elections are just months away and another presidential election already looms. Who will be the political leader with the courage and presence of mind to declare: “Enough! Stop this madness!” Man or woman, straight or gay, black, brown, or white, that person will deserve the nation’s gratitude and the support of the electorate. Until that occurs, however, the American penchant for war will stretch on toward infinity.


To bolster the president’s arguments for cutting back immigration, the administration recently released a fear-mongering report about future terrorist threats. Among the potential threats: a Sudanese national who, in 2016, “pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS”; an Uzbek who “posted a threat on an Uzbek-language website to kill President Obama in an act of martyrdom on behalf of ISIS”; a Syrian who, in a plea agreement, “admitted that he knew a member of ISIS and that while in Syria he participated in a battle against the Syrian regime, including shooting at others, in coordination with Al Nusrah,” an al-Qaeda offshoot.


The recent appointment of purveyors of anti-Muslim rhetoric to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom exposes the cynical approach Republicans have taken in promoting religious freedom.


RightWeb
share