Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Neocons & Liberals Together, Again

Please honor yourvalues and beliefs and make a donation to help fund the IRC and its Right Webproject. You can do this securely online at: https://secure.iexposure.com/irc/donate.cfm

Thank you!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ThisWeek on the Right

Liberal Hawks Ally withProject for the New American Century

Neoconsand Liberals Together, Again

ByTom Barry

[Excerpt]

Theneoconservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has signaled itsintention to continue shaping the government’s national security strategy witha new public letter stating that the “U.S. military is too small forthe responsibilities we are asking it to assume.” Rather than reining in theimperial scope of U.S. national security strategyas set forth by the first Bush administration, PNAC and the letter’ssignatories call for increasing the size of America’s global fighting machine.

TheJanuary 28th PNAC letter advocates that House and Senate leaders take thenecessary steps “to increase substantially the size of the active duty Army andMarine Corps.”

Joiningthe neocons in the letter to congressional leaderswere a group of prominent liberals—giving some credence to PNAC’sclaim that the “call to act” to increase the total number of U.S. ground forces counts onbipartisan support.

Afteran initial spate of public pronouncements after September 11th and during theonset of the Iraq occupation, the Projectfor the New American Century is again positioning itself as the policyinstitute that will set the second Bush administration’s security agenda.Although PNAC’s 1997 statement of principles includedonly prominent right-wing figures—many of whom later joined the first Bushadministration—the neocon policy institute hasrepeatedly reached out to liberals to give its public letters to the Congressand the president the gloss of bipartisanship.

Itsnew call for congressional leaders to increase overall U.S. troop levels includesendorsement of key liberal analysts. Among the signatories are the leadingforeign policy analysts at the Brookings Institution and the Progressive PolicyInstitute, which are closely associated with the Democratic Party. Theendorsees of the letter are largely neoconservatives who are principals in suchneocon-led institutes as PNAC, American EnterpriseInstitute (AEI), Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, and the Center forSecurity Policy. However, this call for a larger expeditionary force was alsosigned by prominent liberal hawks, including Michael O’Hanlon, Ivo Daalder, James Steinberg, andWill Marshall—all of whom have signed previous PNAC letters and policystatements.

Mugging and Hugging

IrvingKristol, known as the “godfather of neoconservatism,” famously defined neoconservatives as“liberals who have been mugged by reality.” That political mugging occurred inthe late 1960s and early 1970s with the rise of the counterculture, theanti-war movement, and progressive New Politics of the Democratic Party.

FormerTrotskyite militants and Cold War liberals like Kristol,Norman Podhoretz, and Midge Decterswitched their loyalties to the Republican Party. The “reality” that mugged theneocons was the progressive turn in the DemocraticParty led by such figures as Jesse Jackson, Bella Abzug,George McGovern, and Jimmy Carter. In contrast, the neoconservatives found themilitant anticommunism and social conservatism of the Ronald Reagan faction inthe Republican Party invigorating. In the neoconlexicon, liberalism became synonymous with secularism, women’s liberation,anti-Americanism, and appeasement.

Overthe past quarter century, the neocons have sought,with increasing success, to rid the Republican Party of its isolationists, itsanti-imperialists, and its realists. The younger neocons,such as William Kristol (son of Irving) and Elliott Abrams(son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz and Midge Decter), have promoted a new right-wing internationalismthat holds that America should be both a globalcop and a global missionary for freedom.

Traditionalconservatives and Republican Party realists say that the neocons’foreign policy agenda is, respectively, neo-imperialist and unrealistic aboutthe capacity of U.S. military power to remakethe world. Apart from their militarist friends in the Pentagon and defenseindustries, the neocons are finding that theirclosest ideological allies are the internationalists in the liberal camp.Having recuperated from their mugging, the neoconsare now reaching out to liberals who share their idealism about America’s global mission. To thedelight of the neocons at PNAC and AEI, aninfluential group of liberal hawks share their vision of a U.S. grand strategy that willcreate a world order based on U.S. military supremacy and America’s presumed moralsuperiority.

(Tom Barry is policydirector of the International Relations Center, online at http://www.irc-online.org and author ofnumerous books on international relations.)

Seecomplete Right Web article online at: /analysis/2005/0502ally.php

Withprinter-friendly .pdf version at: http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/pdf/0502ally.pdf

For more informationabout the liberal hawks, see the following Right Web profiles from the IRC:

Projectfor a New American Century: /org/pnac.php

WillMarshall: /ind/marshall/marshall.php

ProgressivePolicy Institute: /org/ppi.php

DemocraticLeadership Council: /org/demleadcoun.php

SocialDemocrats/USA: /org/social-democrats.php

TopicalProfiles

FrankGaffney: /ind/gaffney/gaffney.php

Centerfor Security Policy: /org/csp.php

CharlesKrauthammer: /ind/krauthammer/krauthammer.php

ElliottAbrams: /ind/abrams/abrams.php

Condoleezza Rice: /ind/rice/rice.php

Lettersand Comments

Re:Douglas Feith (/ind/feith/feith.php)

Iwas very impressed with your article on Douglas Feithand all that he has done to help shape neoconservative policies in thisadministration. I consider myself a conservative/populist American. However, Idon’t consider myself a Republican anymore due to George W’s four years ofmisguided Middle East policies. It was so interesting to finally see the connection that the neocons and the militarists have with all these lobbygroups that represent only their short-minded view of the world–or theinterest of nation other than our own. After I read this and other articles, Iam more convinced now that this administration is more concerned with Middle East “democracy” thanit is of our own safety.

– CraigZander < craig_zander@yahoo.com>

Re:Michael Novak (/ind/novak/novak.php)

Aunque fueen 1994 que se publicó el libro. Este hemisferio de libertadde Michael Novak, siempre lo comentéen una modesta universidad en la escuela de ciencias políticas de mi país. Estoy convencido que es muy oportunopromover conferencias sobre la temática de esa obra y de otrasque posibiliten continuar fortaleciendo y entendiendo la democrácia como una forma de vida, especialmente en mi país El Salvador. óoy fundador de una organizacion de reciente creación : fundacionlibertad.org.sv.

– RafaelMenjivar Lopez (raphaelml3@yahoo.com)

Re:Right Web Individual Profiles (/ind/index.php)

Wishyou would expand your list to include, among others, Ralph Reed, Tom DeLay, Dennis Hassert, Paul Weyrich, etc. Itwould be useful to understand ALL of the “players” in the right-wingmovement, the roles they play, etc. An interactive web site, and perhaps a CDwith the web site on it would be a great tool for the politically interested tounderstand size and scope of the conservative machine.

– FranzHespenheide (franzh@comcast.net)

If you would like to see our variety of free ezines and listservs, please go to: http://www.irc-online.org/lists/.
To be removed from this list, please email rightweb@irc-online.org with “unsubscribe Right Web.”

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Bernard Lewis was a renowned historian of Islam and the Middle East who stirred controversy with his often chauvinistic attitude towards the Muslim world and his associations with high-profile neoconservatives and foreign policy hawks.


John Bolton, the controversial former U.S. ambassador to the UN and dyed-in the-wool foreign policy hawk, is President Trump’s National Security Adviser McMaster, reflecting a sharp move to the hawkish extreme by the administration.


Michael Joyce, who passed away in 2006, was once described by neoconservative guru Irving Kristol as the “godfather of modern philanthropy.”


Mike Pompeo, the Trump administration’s second secretary of state, is a long time foreign policy hawk and has led the public charge for an aggressive policy toward Iran.


Max Boot, neoconservative military historian at the Council on Foreign Relations, on Trump and Russia: “At every turn Trump is undercutting the ‘get tough on Russia’ message because he just can’t help himself, he just loves Putin too much.”


Michael Flynn is a former Trump administration National Security Advisor who was forced to step down only weeks on the job because of his controversial contacts with Russian officials before Trump took office.


Since taking office Donald Trump has revealed an erratic and extremely hawkish approach to U.S. foreign affairs, which has been marked by controversial actions like dropping out of the Iran nuclear agreement that have raised tensions across much of the world and threatened relations with key allies.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Soon after a Saudi-led coalition strike on a bus killed 40 children on August 9, a CENTCOM spokesperson stated to Vox, “We may never know if the munition [used] was one that the U.S. sold to them.”


The West has dominated the post-war narrative with its doctrine of liberal values, arguing that not only were they right in themselves but that economic success itself depended on their application. Two developments have challenged those claims. The first was the West’s own betrayal of its principles: on too many occasions the self interest of the powerful, and disdain for the victims of collateral damage, has showed through. The second dates from more recently: the growth of Chinese capitalism owes nothing to a democratic system of government, let alone liberal values.


Falsely demonizing all Muslims, their beliefs, and their institutions is exactly the wrong way to make Americans safer, because the more we scare ourselves with imaginary enemies, the harder it will be to find and protect ourselves from real ones.


Division in the ranks of the conservative movement is a critical sign that a war with Iran isn’t inevitable.


Donald Trump stole the headlines, but the declaration from the recent NATO summit suggests the odds of an unnecessary conflict are rising. Instead of inviting a dialogue, the document boasts that the Alliance has “suspended all practical civilian and military cooperation between NATO and Russia.” The fact is, NATO was a child of the Cold War, when the West believed that the Soviets were a threat. But Russia today is not the Soviet Union, and there’s no way Moscow would be stupid enough to attack a superior military force.


War with Iran may not be imminent, but neither was war with Iraq in late 2001.


Donald Trump was one of the many bets the Russians routinely place, recognizing that while most such bets will never pay off a few will, often in unpredictable ways. Trump’s actions since taking office provide the strongest evidence that this one bet is paying off handsomely for the Russians. Putin could hardly have made the script for Trump’s conduct at the recent NATO meeting any more to his liking—and any better designed to foment division and distrust within the Western alliance—than the way Trump actually behaved.


RightWeb
share