Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

The Right-Wing Americans Who Made a Doc About Argentina

The makers of a new anti-Argentine government documentary on the death of Argentine prosecutor Alberto Nisman have ties to notorious holders of Argentina’s debt.

Print Friendly


A new documentary about the death of Alberto Nisman, the Argentine prosecutor found in a pool of blood in his apartment last winter, premiered last week at Washington, D.C.’s Newseum. One might wonder why a movie about Argentina, in Spanish and apparently aimed at Argentine audiences, premiered on the East Coast of the United States. But geopolitical intrigue played a role in the prosecutor’s death. Nisman’s controversial investigation accused Iran of ordering the 1994 bombing of the Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in which 85 people were killed. And his body was discovered a day before he was to present a criminal complaint against Argentina President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and Foreign Minister Hector Timerman for an alleged attempt to persuade Interpol to revoke “red notices” issued against half a dozen of Tehran’s top leaders.

The new documentary, Los Abandonados (The Abandoned), presents a narrative that encompasses the bombing of the Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina (AMIA) center, Nisman’s allegations against Iran in 2006, and finally, the prosecutor’s untimely death by a .22-caliber revolver pistol shot to the head. The story is told with archival footage, dramatic re-enactments, and interviews with journalists, politicians, and experts—many, though not all, from Argentine opposition circles.

The bias in sourcing in favor of the Argentine opposition is not much of a surprise. Argentine politics are notoriously partisan, with media outlets and just about everyone else picking sides between the government and the opposition. The filmmakers clearly and uncritically accepted the conclusions of Nisman’s investigations—both Iranian responsibility for the AMIA bombing and the government’s efforts to quash the Interpol warrants—and saw them as the cause of Nisman’s demise. The filmmakers suggest that Iran was behind it, though without offering evidence (other than an unsupported assertion by one Argentine journalist that Iran had issued a fatwa in 2006 ordering the prosecutor’s murder). Those points of entry would naturally direct a filmmaker to seek out opposition-friendly sources.

What should raise a few eyebrows, however, are ties between the film and the U.S. partisans behind it. The driving cinematic force behind the film, Matthew A. Taylor, is a former Republican operative who still works in American right-wing circles. Although most of Taylor’s previous efforts (more on that in a moment) seemed to be geared at bolstering Republican and right-wing positions in the U.S., Los Abandonados is targeted at Argentines. The morning after premiering in Washington, the movie was released online for a small rental fee. It seems unlikely that the movie will be able to recoup the costs of what appeared to be an expensive production, leaving one to wonder who funded it, and why.

The movie’s ties to Republican Party operatives and the American Task Force Argentina (ATFA), a lobby group representing foreign Argentine debt holders who have refused to accept a substantial discount on the country’s defaulted bonds —not to mention the striking overlap between the two—might hold some answers. And those ties could raise questions, too, about the film’s political and financial motives. It was perhaps not coincidental that the film was released a month before Argentina’s presidential elections in which Fernandez’s preferred successor, Daniel Scioli, has vowed to continue her efforts to resist ATFA’s demands for full payment on the debt. (Under Argentina’s constitution, Fernandez is barred from running for another term.)

The Filmmakers

Matthew Taylor, the director, cut his teeth working for the 2004 Bush-Cheney presidential campaign. According to a cached bio for a film he later worked on, Taylor “produced and edited” attack ads for the campaign, including the infamous television spot that showed John Kerry windsurfing and one that assailed the Democratic presidential nominee for being a “flip-flopper.” After the campaign, he went on to work for the Tea Party-affiliated Citizens United, overseeing the group’s film productions. Taylor moved between a political ad firm and Citizens United, according to the online biography, but ultimately landed back at the powerhouse PAC, where he ended up working on 13 films, including Newt and Callista Gingrich’s documentary, “America at Risk,” and Dick Morris’ “Battle for America,” which both list Taylor in the production credits. Citizens United was presumably the venue for Taylor’s introduction to Alan Peterson, who would go on to co-produce Los Abandonados.

Taylor’s intensely partisan work offers few explanations about why he suddenly developed an eye for Argentina, the AMIA attack, or Alberto Nisman. At the Washington premiere of Los Abandonados, Taylor offered only that his interest was sparked by “geopolitical intrigue, mystery.”

But other American right-wingers who worked on Los Abandonados have more direct interests in Latin America. One of the film’s associate producers, Douglas Farah, a former reporter turned national security consultant, has much closer associations with Argentine affairs. In 2004, after reporting for outlets such as The Washington Post from regions like Central America and West Africa, Farah aligned himself with hawkish, Washington-based organizations, writing as an expert on illicit finance and terrorism.

Since then, Farah’s writing and congressional testimony on the AMIA bombings has gotten the attention of organizations affiliated with hedge fund billionaire and Republican megadonor Paul Singer, the largest holdout in the protracted conflict between Argentina’s government and its bond holders and an ATFA funder and member from its inception in 2006. In June, 2013, Farah published a column in the Miami Herald, co-bylined with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Executive Director Mark Dubowitz, warning of Iran’s “presence in the [western] hemisphere,” and characterizing Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s government—a main target of Los Abandonados’s ire—as “close to drowning in a flood of corruption scandals and destructive fiscal policies” and “seeking desperately to ignore Nisman’s report and embrace Iran as a commercial and political partner.” Singer’s Elliott Management firm, incidentally, stands to stands to gain more than a billion dollars on its initial investment, estimated at well under $100 million in discounted Argentine bonds, if he and the other holdouts prevail in their fight to recover the full debt plus interest.

In response to e-mailed questions, Farah, who said he had been a friend of Nisman’s and thought highly of the prosecutor’s work, told LobeLog, “My involvement [in Los Abandonados] was in helping shape the narrative due to my series of in-depth reports on Argentina and the corruption of the Fernández de Kirchner government.”

Organizational Links

FDD, for its part, has been an outspoken critic of Kirchner but has never disclosed the organization’s conflict of interest in taking on her government. From 2008 to 2011, Paul Singer was the group’s second-largest donor, contributing $3.6 million.

The neoconservative think-tank, however, isn’t Farah’s only link to holders of Argentine debt. ATFA, which took out full-page ads in U.S. newspapers in 2013 linking Kirchner with then-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, provided a $42,500 grant to the International Assessment and Strategy Center (IASC), a small organization where Farah is a senior fellow. (Farah told LobeLog he doesn’t know “any members of the ATFA, nor do I know if any were involved in the film’s financing.” He added, “I have had no involvement in IASC finances or fundraising, nor do I know what the money was spent on.”)

The ATFA grant, which accounts for over a quarter of the grant revenue collected by IASC in 2013 (the last year for which tax filings are available for ATFA or IASC), was intended, according to ATFA disclosures, “for the support of the organization’s general policy and advocacy work.”

There’s big money behind ATFA—and a political motive that Los Abandonados would suit—but no direct evidence of the group’s involvement in the film itself. The Newseum had been rented as the premiere space (they did not host the event in their organizational capacity). Asked by LobeLog who made the rental, Christopher Ford, who manages special events at the Newseum, said only, “It’s a private event, so we don’t divulge that information.” He described the rental as a “business transaction.”

Aside from attacking Kirchner, the filmmakers revealed a second motive at the premiere: to serve as a warning about Iran. Although insisting that the film was started before the nuclear deal with Iran was finally struck—but not, of course, before diplomacy kicked into high gear—Taylor told the audience last week, “The Iran deal parallels this film.” He went on, “The film is about what happens when you do business with Iran. [Argentina] did business with Iran—and got two bombings and an assassination.” He made no mention of Argentina’s ongoing election campaign.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS), President Trump’s nominee for secretary of state to replace Rex Tillerson, is a “tea party” Republican who previously served as director of the CIA.

Richard Goldberg is a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who served as a foreign policy aide to former Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL).

Reuel Marc Gerecht, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, has been advocating regime change in Iran since even before 9/11.

John Hannah, Dick Cheney’s national security adviser, is now a leading advocate for regime change in both Iran and Syria based at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Dennis Ross, a U.S. diplomat who served in the Obama administration, is a fellow at the “pro-Israel” Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Sheldon Adelson is a wealthy casino magnate known for his large, influential political contributions, his efforts to impact U.S. foreign policy discourse particularly among Republicans, and his ownership and ideological direction of media outlets.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is known for his hawkish views on foreign policy and close ties to prominent neoconservatives.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

North Korea and Iran both understand the lesson of Libya: Muammar Qaddafi, a horrifyingly brutal dictator, gave up his nuclear weapons, was eventually ousted from power with large-scale US assistance, and was killed. However, while Iran has a long and bitter history with the United States, North Korea’s outlook is shaped by its near-total destruction by forces led by the United States in the Korean War.

Print Friendly

Europe loathes having to choose between Tehran and Washington, and thus it will spare no efforts to avoid the choice. It might therefore opt for a middle road, trying to please both parties by persuading Trump to retain the accord and Iran to limit missile ballistic programs and regional activities.

Print Friendly

Key members of Trump’s cabinet should recognize the realism behind encouraging a Saudi- and Iranian-backed regional security agreement because the success of such an agreement would not only serve long-term U.S. interests, it could also have a positive impact on numerous conflicts in the Middle East.

Print Friendly

Given that Israel failed to defeat Hezbollah in its war in Lebanon in 2006, it’s difficult to imagine Israel succeeding in a war against both Hezbollah and its newfound regional network of Shiite allies. And at the same time not only is Hezbollah’s missile arsenal a lot larger and more dangerous than it was in 2006, but it has also gained vast experience alongside its allies in offensive operations against IS and similar groups.

Print Friendly

Donald Trump should never be excused of responsibility for tearing down the respect for truth, but a foundation for his flagrant falsifying is the fact that many people would rather be entertained, no matter how false is the source of their entertainment, than to confront truth that is boring or unsatisfying or that requires effort to understand.

Print Friendly

It would be a welcome change in twenty-first-century America if the reckless decision to throw yet more unbelievable sums of money at a Pentagon already vastly overfunded sparked a serious discussion about America’s hyper-militarized foreign policy.

Print Friendly

President Trump and his advisers ought to ask themselves whether it is in the U.S. interest to run the risk of Iranian withdrawal from the nuclear agreement. Seen from the other side of the Atlantic, running that risk looks dumb.