Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Andrew C. McCarthy


[![Alternative text]!]
    • Foundation for Defense of Democracies: Project co-chair
    • National Review Institute: Fellow

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Andrew C. McCarthy is a former federal prosecutor closely associated with a number of neoconservative and other militarist policy factions in the United States. He is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute (NRI), a right-wing policy group connected to National Review magazine, and co-chair of the Center for Law and Counterterrorism, a joint project of NRI and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.[1]

Like many of his neoconservative counterparts, McCarthy tends to see Islam as threatening to the West.[2] In particular,according to McCarthy, Salafism—the original inspiration of the Muslim Brotherhood—is the core ideological foundation of both Islamist terrorists as well as other Muslims who reject terrorism. Writing in the Washington Examiner, he claimed that both groups nevertheless reject Western rationalism and the Christian unity of faith and reason, instead favoring Sharia determinism. “Both support the development of fundamentalist Muslim enclaves and the ultimate supplanting of American constitutional democracy by Islamic law. Non-terrorist Islamists want to overthrow the U.S. government every bit as much as the terrorists do. They are not moderates. Their differences with the terrorists are over means and methods, not goals.”[3]

McCarthy has used his perch at the National Review to promote various conspiracy theories, including adding his voice in 2008 to the chorus of right-wing voices who called into question whether then-Senator Barack Obama was born in the United States.[4] He sees President Obama as the “bridge figure between the Left and the Islamists,” characterizes Obama’s relationship to the Muslim world as “cagey,” and chastises Obama for not being more upfront about his own Muslim roots.[5] He has called Obama a radical leftist[6]; “an Alinskyite,” alluding to Chicago born community organizer Saul Alinsky; and a “fifth-column radical” with the goal of overthrowing the capitalist social order.[7]

When describing Obama’s handling of foreign policy, he says, “Barack Obama is a wolf in 'pragmatist' clothing: Beneath the easy smile and above-it-all manner—the 'neutral' doing his best to weigh competing claims—is a radical leftist wedded to a Manichean vision that depicts American imperialism as the primary evil in the world.”[8]

Along with Frank Gaffney, James Woolsey and others, McCarthy has formed a “Team B” approach to reviewing current U.S. policy towards Sharia, which he says is modeled after the group formed in 1976 by then CIA director George H.W. Bush to reevaluate the strategy of détente.[9] In September 2010, the Center for Security Policy posted on its website the team’s report, “Shariah: The Threat to America,” which was roundly criticized by experts in Islam.

McCarthy worked as an assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York for 18 years. From 1993 through 1996, he led the prosecution against the jihad organization of Omar Abdel Rahman, which resulted in the conviction of a dozen people on charges related to terrorist plots, including the 1993 World Trade Center bombing[10] and plots to bomb the UN, the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, and other landmarks.[11]He also worked on the prosecutions of the bombers of the U.S. Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya.[12] Following the 9/11 attacks, he supervised the Justice Department’s Command Post near Ground Zero in New York City.[13]

In 2004, the George W. Bush administration tapped McCarthy to serve as a special assistant to the deputy secretary of defense.[14]

McCarthy’s views on legal justice have shifted over the years. Hehas criticized the military commissions system as well as private lawyers assisting detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. He called for creation of a national security court rather than allowing terrorism suspects to be tried in the civilian justice system.[15]

In addition to writing for the National Review, McCarthy is a frequent guest on conservative broadcast networks. He is the author of several books, including The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America(Encounter Books, 2010), Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad (Encounter Books 2008), and How the Obama Administration Has Politicized Justice (Encounter’s “Broadsides” series, 2010).[16]

He has taught law at New York Law School and Fordham University’s School of Law.

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Affiliations

    • Center for Law and Counterterrorism: Co-chair
    • National Review Online: Contributing Editor
    • Foundation for Defense of Democracies: Project co-chair

     

    Government

    • Defense Department: Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of Defense (2004)
    • U.S. Attorney’s Office, New York: Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of NY (1993-1996)
    • U.S. Attorney’s Office, New York: Chief Assistant for the Southern District of NY (1999-2003)
    • U.S. Marshall Service: Former Deputy Marshal

     

    Education

    • Columbia College
    • New York Law School
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1] National Review Institute, “Fellows,” http://nrinstitute.org/fellows.php (accessed October 1, 2010}.

[2]Encounter Books, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, http://www.encounterbooks.com/books/the-grand-jihad/.

[3] Andrew C. McCarthy, "Ignorance about Islamic Radicalism is Our Downfall," Washington Examiner, May 25, 2010, http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/ignorance-about-Islamic-radicalism-is-our-downfall-9476397.htm#ixzz12MnbkcPM.

[4] Andy McCarthy, “Is There Legitimate Doubt About Obama’s Eligibility to be President?” National Review, July 6, 2008, http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/165461/there-legitimate-doubt-about-obamas-eligibility-be-president/andy-mccarthy.

[5] Roger Aronoff, “Interview with Andrew C. McCarthy on War, Politics and Media,” BlogTalk Radio Show Take AIM, June 15, 2010, http://www.aim.org/on-target-blog/andrew-c-mccarthy-on-war-politics-and-media/.

[6] Roger Aronoff, “Interview with Andrew C. McCarthy on War, Politics and Media,” BlogTalk Radio Show Take AIM, June 15, 2010, http://www.aim.org/on-target-blog/andrew-c-mccarthy-on-war-politics-and-media/.

[7] Andrew C. McCarthy, “Alinsky Does Afghanistan,” National Review, December 4, 2009, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228741/alinsky-does-afghanistan/andrew-c-mccarthy.

[8]Andrew C. McCarthy, “Obama Frees Iranian Terror Masters,” National Review, July 11, 2009, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/227867/obama-frees-iranian-terror-masters/andrew-c-mccarthy?page=1.

[9] R. James Woolsey, Andrew C. McCarthy and Harry E. Soyster, “Second Opinion Needed on Shariah: Our political establishment wears blinders and ignores the threat”, Washington Times, September 14, 2010, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/14/needed-a-second-opinion-on-shariah/.

[10] Foundation for Defense of Democracy, "Andrew C. McCarthy," http://www.defensedemocracy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=23928&itemid=283.

[11] Benjamin Weiser, "Top Terror Prosecutor is a Critic of Civilian Trials," New York Times, February 19, 2010,http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/nyregion/20prosecutor.html.

[15] Benjamin Weiser, "Top Terror Prosecutor is a Critic of Civilian Trials," New York Times, February 19, 2010, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/nyregion/20prosecutor.html.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org