Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

David J. Kramer


[![Alternative text]!]
    • Freedom House: Executive director
    • German Marshall Fund: Former fellow
    • State Department: Former Assistant Secretary of State

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

David Kramer is a former Sovietologist who serves as executive director of Freedom House, a U.S. government-funded democracy advocacy group that has been closely associated with neoconservative advocacy for decades. Kramer’s experience also includes working as a fellow at the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a pressure group founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan that was notorious for its efforts to push the United States into war with Iraq after the 9/11 attacks. A political appointee in the Condoleeza Rice-led State Department during George W. Bush’s second term, Kramer’s final post in the Bush administration was as assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor, a post he held from March 2008 until January 2009.[1]

Before joining Freedom House in 2010, Kramer was a “senior transatlantic fellow” at the German Marshall Fund. From this perch, Kramer penned various critiques of the Obama administration’s foreign policy in op-eds and for the Foreign Policy blog Shadow Government. In a September 2009 op-ed for the Washington Post, Kramer criticized President Obama for “acquiescing” to Russia on missile defense. Pointing to the administration’s decision to abandon controversial plans to develop missile defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic—which were originally pursued by the George W. Bush administration—Kramer argued that Obama’s decision was a “capitulation to Russian pressure” and “a serious betrayal of loyal allies in Warsaw and Prague whose governments pursued politically unpopular positions at the request of the Bush administration to help confront a rising threat from Iran.”[2]

Serious arms control analysts, however, applauded Obama’s decision, arguing that the Polish-Czech plan was designed to defend against a non-existent threat and that in any case the plan was to be replaced with alternative defense systems. "The Obama administration made the right call," said Tom Collina, research director at the Arms Control Association. "It would have been extremely unwise to proceed with the Bush administration's plan to rush untested interceptors into Poland to deal with an Iranian long-range missile threat that does not yet exist. President Obama's more pragmatic approach steers the United States toward a European missile defense that addresses more realistic threats and also facilitates deeper reductions in bloated U.S. and Russian nuclear stockpiles.”[3]

Kramer’s State Department biography states:

“From July 2005 to March of 2008, Mr. Kramer was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, responsible for Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus affairs, as well as regional nonproliferation issues. Previously, he served in the Department of State Office of Policy Planning as a Professional Staff Member, and before that, was Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs. He also was Executive Director of the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy in Washington.

“Before joining the Government, he was a Senior Fellow at the Project for the New American Century, Associate Director of the Russian and Eurasian Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and Assistant Director of Russian and Eurasian Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, all in Washington. Prior to moving to Washington, he was a Lecturer in Russian Studies at Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts and a Teaching Fellow at Harvard University. He also served as an analyst for the Christian Science Monitor Network during the collapse of the Soviet Union.

“A native of Massachusetts, Mr. Kramer received his M.A. in Soviet studies from Harvard University and his B.A. in Soviet Studies and Political Science from Tufts University.”[4]



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

David J. Kramer Résumé

    Affiliations

    • Freedom House: Executive director (2010- )
    • German Marshall Fund: Former fellow
    • Project for the New American Century: Former senior fellow
    • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Former assistant director of Russian and Eurasian studies
    • Center for Strategic and International Studies: Former assistant director of Russian and Eurasian studies

     

    Government

    • State Department: Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2008-2009); Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs (2005-2008)

     

    Education

    • Tufts University: BA Soviet Studies and Political Science
    • Harvard University: MA Soviet Studies
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources


[1]
Freedom House, “Mr. David J. Kramer,” http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=92&staff=450.

[2] David Kramer, "Obama Acquiesces to Russia on Missile Defense,” Washington Post, September 18, 2009, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/17/AR2009091702303.html.

[3] Arms Control Association, media advisory, "ACA Welcomes Shift to a More Pragmatic U.S. Missile Defense Policy,” September 17, 2009, http://www.armscontrol.org/pressroom/missiledefenseshift.

[4] U.S. State Department, “Biography: David J. Kramer,” http://www.state.gov/outofdate/bios/102577.htm.

Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Related Profiles:
Freedom House

Although no longer as closely associated with neoconservative activism as it was during much of the last few decades, Freedom House continues to support campaigns aligned with hawkish factions in U.S. politics.

Project for the New American Century

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was established in 1997 by a number of leading neoconservative writers and pundits to advocate aggressive U.S. foreign policies and “rally...

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org