Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Ethics and Public Policy Center

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), founded in 1976, is one of a handful of organizations established by neoconservatives to promote an increased role of religion in public policy and turn back the influence of secularism. Similar institutions include the Institute on Religion and Democracy and the Institute on Religion and Public Life, as well as the various religious freedom programs created by think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute. EPPC describes itself as “dedicated to applying the Judeo-Christian moral tradition to critical issues of public policy. According to the group’s website, “EPPC and its scholars have consistently sought to defend the great Western ethical imperatives—respect for the inherent dignity of the human person, individual freedom and responsibility, justice, the rule of law, and limited government.” The center sponsors conferences, publishes books and reports, and provides the media with policy analysis relating to its research programs. It operates a numerous programs that mix politics with religion.[1]

The group has attracted attention most recently as the post-Senate perch of GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum, who joined EPPC as a senior fellow soon after losing his reelection campaign in November 2006. The group has paid Santorum at least $217,000[2] annually to run a program called “America’s Enemies,” a project devoted to “identifying, studying, and heightening awareness of the threats posed to America and the West from a growing array of anti-Western forces that are increasingly casting a shadow over our future and violating religious liberty around the world."

Santorum has used his perch to comment on a range of U.S. foreign policy issues. In a May 2011 op-ed for the National Review Online entitled “Israel in Peril,” for example, Santorum offered an overstated critique of President Obama’s Middle East policy, accusing the president of “put[ting] Israel’s very existence in peril” and “coddling” U.S. enemies. He also criticized the Obama administration for its responses to the Arab spring uprisings in Egypt and Syria, writing:

“President Obama's immoral Middle East policy goes beyond directly pressuring Israel; see how he has treated other allies and enemies in the region. President Obama told Egypt's Hosni Mubarak he had to leave office but he has coddled Syria, rewarding that rogue state with a U.S. ambassadorship George W. Bush pulled years ago. Going further, despite Syria's much more brutal crackdown on its own people, President Obama has yet to call for Syria's leader, Bashar Assad, to leave power. The confusion to most of us—but not to our or Israel's enemies—is precisely this: Mubarak was an ally, and the key leader in Egypt responsible for maintaining peace with Israel. Assad is an enemy, heading up one of the chief state sponsors of terrorism in the Middle East. President Obama opposed the ally and sided with the enemy.”[3]

In other writings, Santorum has issued alarmist statements about Iran’s nuclear program, decried the treatment of Christians in majority-Muslim countries, and expressed his support for Mexico’s drug war, among sundry other subjects.[4] His work with EPPC has appeared to be on hold during his presidential campaign.

History

When he founded EPPC in 1976, Ernest Lefever, then a professor of political science, said that part of the role of a "small ethically oriented center" like EPPC was to "respond directly to ideological critics who insist the corporation is fundamentally unjust." President Ronald Reagan's first nominee to direct the State Department's Office for Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, Lefever was regarded as a fierce critic of President Jimmy Carter's human rights policy. Among his purported credentials as a human rights advocate was his white paper "The Trivialization of Human Rights," published in 1978 by EPPC. In testimony before a Senate committee the following year, Lefever set forth his ideas on human rights, recommending that the human rights records of governments receiving U.S. aid should "not be judged primarily by their internal policies but by their foreign policies.”[5] This attitude became a standard neoconservative position, one that would influence the policies of both the Reagan administration and, two decades later, the George W. Bush administration.

An embarrassing conflict of interest between the EPPC and Nestle Corp., which had contributed $35,000 to the institute, resulted in such bad publicity that the Reagan administration withdrew Lefever nomination for the human rights post. Critics had campaigned against Nestle for its aggressive marketing of infant formula in undeveloped countries. In a Fortune magazine article, however, Lefever attacked Nestle's critics as "Marxists marching under the banner of Christ." (The anti-Nestle infant formula campaign led to a near-unanimous vote in the United Nations to establish an international code for advertising of breast milk substitutes. U.S. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick cast the sole vote against the voluntary code on the grounds that it restricted free trade.[6]

In place of Lefever, the Reagan administration nominated Elliott Abrams, who espoused the same instrumentalist position on human rights as Lefever, saying that human rights should be a "policy tool" of the U.S. government. Abrams, who would go on to serve as EPPC's president from 1996 to 2001, entered the Reagan administration scandal-free, but he left a convicted (and later pardoned) criminal for his role in the Iran-Contra scandal.

Lefever was one of the founding members of the 1970s incarnation of the anti-communist Committee on the Present Danger, a group later revived by a number of neoconservatives and hardliners to champion "America's war on terror." Lefever continued to write about ethics and public policy until his death in 2009. His 1998 book, America's Imperial Burden, addressed what he considered to be pertinent moral and ethical questions associated with empire building. According to Lefever, no moral quandaries arise from the U.S. government's imperial status. He considered it the pressing responsibility of the United States, as the world's preeminent power, to export "peace and freedom." If the United States lives up to its historical responsibilities, Lefever wrote, the country will "remain faithful to the vision of America's founders," which he claimed included the belief in a God-given mission to extend its values abroad.

In addition to promulgating the supposed U.S. ethical responsibility to be proficiently imperialist, the EPPC concentrates on U.S.-Middle East relations, arguing that the country has the moral responsibility to support right-wing hawks in Israel. After Elliott Abrams left the center to join the George W. Bush administration, Hillel Fradkin became the center's president. Like Abrams, Fradkin has been closely associated with the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Fradkin was vice president from 1987 to 1998 of the Bradley Foundation, a leading neoconservative fundraising outfit, and previously worked as a program officer at the Olin Foundation and at the Institute for Education Affairs.

EPPC president as of 2012 is M. Edward Whelan III, who also directs the center's program on "The Constitution, the Courts, and the Culture." As a contributor to the right-wing National Review Online’s blog on judicial nominations, Whelan was a leading commentator on the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

Working with the Republican Congress, the EPPC, together with the Christian Coalition and Family Research Council, proposed the creation of a new permanent governmental commission that would focus on "religious persecution." The main countries of concern listed in the congressional deliberations were China, Sudan, North Korea, Cuba, Laos, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia, but also condemned Muslim nations more generally. Like the right-wing social conservative groups that argued for its creation, the government's religious persecution commission has served to shift the primary consideration of U.S. human rights policy from a respect for political rights to the treatment of religious minorities, especially in countries that have long captured the attention of social conservatives, such as China and Sudan. Similarly, the commission—like its private counterparts like the EPPC or the Institute on Religion and Democracy—highlights for policy attention the treatment of Jews and Christians by Muslim or communist societies. Given the highly selective character of U.S. human rights policy, the increased U.S. focus on religious rights has done nothing to diminish rising international concerns that the U.S. government accepts the assumption that there is a clash of civilizations, and furthermore intends to defeat all cultural opponents, at home or abroad.

Several EPPC scholars and associates were tapped to serve in the George W. Bush administration, including Abrams (National Security Council), Alex Acosta (attorney general's office), Robert George (Council on Bioethics), and Nina Shokraii Rees (assistant to the vice president).

Leadership and Funding

EPPC’s board of directors is chaired by William Burleigh, a former CEO of the E.W. Scipps Company and the director of the Hebrew Union College Ethics Center. Its vice chairman is Robert P. George, director of the James Madison Program at Princeton University. Past board members include the late Jeane Kirkpatrick and  Richard Neuhaus.

Members of the EPCC's Policy Advisory Board, who "assist EPCC's scholars," include Peter Berkowitz, William KristolLewis Lehrman, Gilbert Meilaender, Mark Noll, and Michael Novak.

Much EPPC's funding has come from the so-called "four sisters" of the conservative foundation world: the Olin, Bradley, Smith Richardson, and Sarah Scaife foundations. The center has also been supported by the Castle Rock and Earhart foundations.

EPPC's staff and fellows include Michael Cromartie (EPPC vice president and former special assistant to the Christian Right's Charles Colson), George Weigel, Stanley Kurtz, Eric Cohen, Peter Wehner, and Christine Rosen.

 

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1]  EPPC, “About,” http://www.eppc.org/about/.

[2]  Marcus Stern and Kristina Cooke, “Rivals set to pounce on Santorum's past,” Reuters, January 5, 2012, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/05/us-campaign-santorum-newspro-idUSTRE8040RV20120105.

[3]  Rick Santorum, “Israel in Peril,” National Review Online, May 20, 2011, http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/267797/israel-peril-rick-santorum.

[4]  For a full list of Santorum’s writings for EPPC, see http://www.eppc.org/scholars/view.,recNo.11,scholarID.88,type.1/pub_list.asp.

[5]  Jerry W. Sanders, Peddlers of Crisis: The Committee on the Present Danger (Boston: South End Press, 1983), p. 295, citing Cindy Buhl, "A Disappearing Policy: Human Rights and the Reagan Administration," Coalition for A New Foreign and Military Policy, Policy Analysis, October 1981, and "Nominee Toughest on Soviets," Honolulu Advertiser, May 19, 1981.

[6]  Ellen Hume, "Behind Lefever's Downfall," Los Angeles Times, May 27, 1984.

Share RightWeb

Ethics and Public Policy Center Résumé

Contact Information

Ethics and Public Policy Center
1730 M Street N.W., Suite 910
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 682-1200
Fax: (202) 408-0632
E-mail: Ethics@eppc.org
http://www.eppc.org


Founded

1976


Mission Statement (2012)

“Founded in 1976, the Ethics and Public Policy Center is Washington, D.C.'s premier institute dedicated to applying the Judeo-Christian moral tradition to critical issues of public policy. From the Cold War to the war on terrorism, from disputes over the role of religion in public life to battles over the nature of the family, EPPC and its scholars have consistently sought to defend the great Western ethical imperatives -- respect for the inherent dignity of the human person, individual freedom and responsibility, justice, the rule of law, and limited government.”


Board of Directors (2012)

  • William R. Burleigh, Chairman
  • Robert P. George, Vice Chairman
  • Kenneth W. Bickford
  • Eric Cohen
  • Joseph D. “Nick” Decosimo
  • Amy A. Kass
  • Frank A. Orban, III


Policy Advisory Board (2012)

  • Peter Berkowitz
  • William Kristol
  • Lewis Lehrman
  • Gilbert Meilaender
  • Mark Noll
  • Michael Novak


Fellows and Scholars (2012)

  • Edward Whelan, President
  • Michael Cromartie, Vice President
  • George Weigel
  • Hardley Arkes
  • Stanley Kurtz
  • Wilfred McClay
  • Peter Wehner
  • Brian Walsh
  • James Bowman
  • Yuval Levin
  • James Capretta
  • Adam Keiper
  • John Mueller
  • Herber Schlossberg
  • Carter Snead
  • Algis Valiunas
  • Stephen White
  • Eric Cohen
  • Caitrin Nicol
  • Jeffrey Bell
  • Mary Rice Hasson

Related:

Ethics and Public Policy Center News Feed

AI researchers debate the ethics of sharing potentially harmful programs - The VergeUS Catholic Women Speak Out Before Vatican Summit - National Catholic RegisterAll Stories by Peter Wehner - The AtlanticRogers, Wehner to discuss religion, polarized politics Feb. 12 - Washington University in St. Louis NewsroomTrump to call for ‘comity’ in State of the Union, but rivals scoff amid heightened political warfare - The Washington PostTrump’s ‘America First’ policy could work in Venezuela - The Washington PostConservative strategist takes leave of absence after 'inexcusable mistake' in claim Kavanaugh accuser misidentified alleged attacker - CNNProvoked By Trump, The Religious Left Is Finding Its Voice - OPB NewsYou can't say that on Twitter - Fort Dodge MessengerStatement on the New York State Abortion Law of 2019 | Evangelicals and Catholics Together - First ThingsPresident Trump's approval rating rises after State of the Union address | TheHill - The HillState of the Union speech was the best of Trump's career - Charleston Post CourierLetters from the Vatican: #2 | Xavier Rynne II - First ThingsAccused Spy For Iran Allegedly Radicalized During Stint At US University That Took $100M From Muslim Nations - The Daily Caller'It's a New Assault on the University' - The Chronicle of Higher EducationSupreme Court Disappoints Pro-Lifers, Halts Louisiana Abortion Law - Christianheadlines.comBrett Kavanaugh is confirmed and Ed Whelan is back. - VoxThe cost of sending your kids to public school just might be their souls - LifesiteThe inaugural issue of Ethics & Human Research, January -- February 2019 - EurekAlertPresident of the Ethics and Public Policy Center Ed Whelan Says Democrats' Effort to Stop Kavanaugh Nomination Is "Failing and Fizzling" - FOX News Radio

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

François Nicoullaud, the former French ambassador to Iran, discusses the ups and downs of Iran-France relations and the new US sanctions.


Effective alliances require that powerful states shoulder a far larger share of the alliance maintenance costs than other states, a premise that Donald Trump rejects.


The new imbroglio over the INF treaty does not mean a revival of the old Cold War practice of nuclear deterrence. However, it does reveal the inability of the West and Russia to find a way to deal with the latter’s inevitable return to the ranks of major powers, a need that was obvious even at the time the USSR collapsed.


As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump appeared to recognize the obvious problem of the revolving door. But as the appointment of Patrick Shanahan, who spent 30 years at Boeing, as the Trump administration’s acting secretary of defense reveals, little has changed. America is indeed great again, if you happen to be one of those lucky enough to be moving back and forth between plum jobs in the Pentagon and the weapons industry.


Domestic troubles, declining popularity, and a decidedly hawkish anti-Iran foreign policy team may combine to make the perfect storm that pushes Donald Trump to pull the United States into a new war in the Middle East.


The same calculus that brought Iran and world powers to make a deal and has led remaining JCPOA signatories to preserve it without the U.S. still holds: the alternatives to this agreement – a race between sanctions and centrifuges that could culminate in Iran obtaining the bomb or being bombed – would be much worse.


With Bolton and Pompeo by his side and Mattis departed, Trump may well go with his gut and attack Iran militarily. He’ll be encouraged in this delusion by Israel and Saudi Arabia. He’ll of course be looking for some way to distract the media and the American public. And he won’t care about the consequences.


RightWeb
share