Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Empower America

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Print Friendly

The now-defunct Empower America was a right-wing pressure group cofounded in 1993 by Reagan administration Education Secretary William Bennett and former congressman Jack Kemp that championed conservative domestic policies and hawkish foreign policies. Other former Empower notables included Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Mitt Romney’s 2012 vice presidential running mate who at one time worked as a speechwriter for the group,[1] as well as long-standing Republican Party stalwarts Vin Weber and Jeane Kirkpatrick, who served as directors of the group.[2]

After the 9/11 attacks, Empower America became part of a network of neoconservative-aligned groups that helped promote militarist “war on terror” policies. Empower merged in 2004 with Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE), a rightist pro-free market think tank, to create a new group called FreedomWorks.[3] FreedomWorks, which focuses largely on U.S. domestic policy, promoting smaller government and less taxes, has served as one of the key promoters of establishment “Tea Party” politics in the United States.

According to its mission statement, Empower America was "devoted to ensuring that government actions foster growth, economic well-being, freedom, and individual responsibility. The ideas that have fueled America's stunning economic expansion—opportunity, competition, ownership, and freedom—must be the framework for reform of century-old public systems such as K-12 education, the tax code, and social security. Uniquely positioned in Washington, Empower America bridges the gap between the array of think tanks that produce white papers on the public-policy debate and the actual enactment of policy. In implementing our free-market, entrepreneurial principles into law, we are convinced, through actual experience, that we are the most effective 'delivery' system in existence."[4]

On national security, the group pushed for a "strong and proactive—but distinctively American—foreign policy, one that rejects both short-sighted isolationism and imprudent multilateralism. We believe that the federal government is primarily responsible for guaranteeing the safety of its citizens. Therefore, our goals are twofold: to insure that the U.S. military is prepared for any challenge it may face, and to rapidly deploy an effective missile defense to protect American citizens and allies."

Among Empower's more notable efforts during the early years of the "war on terror" was its creation of Americans for Victory over Terrorism (AVOT), an advocacy outfit closely aligned with pro-war neoconservative groups that helped push public opinion to support the invasion of Iraq. AVOT eventually merged with the conservative Claremont Institute.

According to writer James D'Entremont, while Empower America billed “itself as a 'nonpartisan, nonprofit organization,'” its board of directors was “a blue-ribbon panel of right-wing pro-corporate Republicans, and the organization itself is a kind of stepchild of the Heritage Foundation.”[5]

Among Empower America's main outputs was its yearly publication of “The Index of Leading Cultural Indicators,” which billed itself as a “compilation of facts and figures about the state of American society.”[6] Bennett's introduction to the 2001 index stated: "By many measures, the state of our union is extraordinarily strong. We live in a time of peace and unprecedented prosperity. Citizens of America live longer, and more comfortably, than any other citizens in history. The average American today enjoys luxuries undreamed of by the richest and most powerful of kings in the last century."

The report also celebrated the country's unrivalled leadership in the world, likening the United States to a "colossus." Wrote Bennett: "In terms of military and foreign affairs, we bestride the world like Colossus. Our military dominance is arguably as great as any other nation's in history. No nation is perfect, but to a degree unlike any other nation, we have used our power to advance the causes of liberty, human rights, and democracy worldwide."

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources


[1] Boston Globe, “Paul Ryan Biography,” August 12, 2012, http://articles.boston.com/2012-08-12/politics/33154929_1_gop-response-key-votes-speechwriter.



[2] Wall Street Journal CIO Network, “Vin Weber,” http://cionetwork.wsj.com/?speakers=vin-weber.



[3] “Citizens for a Sound Economy and Empower America Merge as FreedomWorks,” National Review, September 13, 2004.



[4] Empower America Mission Statement (Web Archive), http://web.archive.org/web/20030622093625/www.empoweramerica.org/stories/storyReader$2.



[5] James D'Entremont, "Empower America Profile," MediaTransparency, http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientprofile.php?recipientID=523.



[6] Empower.org, White Papers and Supplemental Reports (Web Archive), http://web.archive.org/web/20021111111850/http://www.empower.org/pubs.htm.


Share RightWeb

Empower America Résumé


Selected Principles

  • William Bennett, former director

  • Jack Kemp, former director

  • Jeane Kirkpatrick, former director

  • Paul Ryan, former speechwriter

  • Vin Weber, former director




Mission Statement



"The ideas that have fueled America's stunning economic expansion—opportunity, competition, ownership, and freedom—must be the framework for reform of century-old public systems such as K-12 education, the tax code, and social security. Uniquely positioned in Washington, Empower America bridges the gap between the array of think tanks that produce white papers on the public-policy debate and the actual enactment of policy. In implementing our free-market, entrepreneurial principles into law, we are convinced, through actual experience, that we are the most effective 'delivery' system in existence."


Related:

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

The Trump administration appears to have been surprised by this breach among its friends in the critical Gulf strategic area. But it is difficult to envision an effective U.S. role in rebuilding this Humpty-Dumpty.


Print Friendly

A recent vote in the European Parliament shows how President Trump’s relentless hostility to Iran is likely to isolate Washington more than Tehran.


Print Friendly

The head of the Institute for Science and International Security—aka “the Good ISIS”—recently demonstrated again his penchant for using sloppy analysis as a basis for politically explosive charges about Iran, in this case using a faulty translation from Persian to misleadingly question whether Tehran is “mass producing advanced gas centrifuges.”


Print Friendly

Trump has exhibited a general preference for authoritarians over democrats, and that preference already has had impact on his foreign policy. Such an inclination has no more to do with realism than does a general preference for democrats over authoritarians.


Print Friendly

The President went to the region as a deal maker and a salesman for American weapon manufacturing. He talked about Islam, terrorism, Iran, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without the benefit of expert advice in any of these areas. After great showmanship in Riyadh, Jerusalem, and Bethlehem, he and his family left the region without much to show for or to benefit the people of that war-torn region.


Print Friendly

Although the Comey memo scandal may well turn out to be what brings Trump down, this breach of trust may have had more lasting effect than any of Trump’s other numerous misadventures. It was an unprecedented betrayal of Israel’s confidence. Ironically, Trump has now done what even Barack Obama’s biggest detractors never accused him of: seriously compromised Israel’s security relationship with the United States.


Print Friendly

Congress and the public acquiesce in another military intervention or a sharp escalation of one of the U.S. wars already under way, perhaps it’s time to finally consider the true costs of war, American-style — in lives lost, dollars spent, and opportunities squandered. It’s a reasonable bet that never in history has a society spent more on war and gotten less bang for its copious bucks.


RightWeb
share