Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran (CNFI) is an offshoot of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) founded in 2015 to “educate the public about the dangers” of the nuclear agreement reached between Iran and the “P5+1” world powers in July 2015.[1]

The Washington Post reported that AIPAC funneled “resources to support Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran, a new 501(c)4 group that is expected to spend around $20 million on advertising and campaigns in up to 40 states to get opponents of the Iran deal to pressure their representatives in Congress.”[2]

According to the neoconservative-aligned Washington Free Beacon, CNFI’s spokesperson, Patrick Dorton, is “a Washington-based political operative who has long done public relations work on behalf of AIPAC.” Dorton describes CNF as “an organization established with the financial support of AIPAC and other orgs and individuals to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons capability.”[3]

“AIPAC seems to regard its own brand as toxic, and maybe Israel’s brand too … Notice that the [CNFI’s] ad says not a word about Israel, which is deceptive,” Mondoweiss’ Philip Weiss has said of CNFI.[4]

CNFI’s multimillion-dollar ad campaign against the Iran deal has been primarily aimed at Democratic constituencies. “It appears AIPAC may be targeting Democratic lawmakers who hold the key to forming a veto-proof majority should the deal be voted down in Congress,” one observer has stated. “The buy appears to target mostly cities and states with Democratic members who may be swayed to vote against the nuke deal.”[5]

Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear expert and director of the East Asia program for the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, strongly criticized CNFI’s main TV ad against the deal, describing it as “very misleading.” Among his criticisms were that “nearly all of the statistics cited” in the ad were “taken out of context.” When asked how he would rank how truthful the ad was, Lewis stated: “If the lowest number I could give is a one, I’d give it a one.”[6]

CNFI has also garnered controversy for its ties to a controversial Iranian opposition group, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), which until 2012 was on the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations. According to a July 2015 LobeLog story: “Two items on the website of Citizens for a Nuclear Iran, one of which was later removed, featured an exiled Iranian opposition group called the Mojahedin-e Khalq.”[7]

One prominent MEK supporter, former Sen. Joe Lieberman, is also a member of CNFI’s advisory board. Lieberman has addressed MEK gatherings in the past and has said the United States “should be working closely” with the group, which advocates for regime change in Iran and has a history of committing violent attacks inside the country.[8]

CNFI’s other advisors are also former hawkish Democratic members of Congress, including former Sens. Evan Bayh (IN), Mark Begich (AK), Mary Landrieu (LA) and former Rep. Shelley Berkley (NV).[9]

The Nation’s Ali Gharib remarked about CNFI’s advisory board: "It's sort of a remarkable list when you look at it. I mean, it's obvious why AIPAC picked them, they're the most stalwart-like traditionally pro-Israel figures that have come off the Hill in recent years."[10]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1] Julie Hirschfeld Davis, "Pro-Israel Aipac Creates Group to Lobby Against the Iran Deal," The New York Times, July 17, 2015,http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/pro-israel-aipac-creates-group-to-lobby-against-the-iran-deal/.

[2] Catherine Ho, “AIPAC spend record $1.7 million as it lobbied Congress to review Iran deal,” The Washington Post, July 20, 2015,http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/07/20/aipacs-lobbying-spending-spikes-as-group-pushes-hard-to-oppose-iran-deal/.

[3] Adam Kredo, “AIPAC-Linked Group Launches $5 Million Ad Campaign Against Nuke Deal,” Free Beacon, July 17, 2015, http://freebeacon.com/national-security/aipac-linked-group-launches-5-million-ad-campaign-against-nuke-deal/.

[4] Philip Weiss, “If Americans support Iran deal, 56-37, what gives Israel the power to ‘croak’ it?” Mondoweiss, July 21, 2015,http://mondoweiss.net/2015/07/americans-support-israel.

[5] Adam Kredo, “AIPAC-Linked Group Launches $5 Million Ad Campaign Against Nuke Deal,” Free Beacon, July 17, 2015, http://freebeacon.com/national-security/aipac-linked-group-launches-5-million-ad-campaign-against-nuke-deal/.

[6] Dave Biscobing, “FACT CHECK: Expert says Iran nuclear deal TV advertisement is 'misleading,'” ABC 15 Arizona, July 24, 2015,http://www.abc15.com/news/national/fact-check-expert-says-iran-nuclear-deal-tv-advertisement-is-misleading.

[7] Eli Clifton and Ali Gharib, “Anti-Iran Deal AIPAC Spin-off Relies on Iranian Ex-Terrorist Group,” LobeLog, July 21, 2015, http://www.lobelog.com/anti-iran-deal-aipac-spin-off-relies-on-iranian-ex-terrorist-group/.

[8] Eli Clifton and Ali Gharib, “Anti-Iran Deal AIPAC Spin-off Relies on Iranian Ex-Terrorist Group,” LobeLog, July 21, 2015, http://www.lobelog.com/anti-iran-deal-aipac-spin-off-relies-on-iranian-ex-terrorist-group/.

[9] Julie Hirschfeld Davis, "Pro-Israel Aipac Creates Group to Lobby Against the Iran Deal," The New York Times, July 17, 2015,http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/pro-israel-aipac-creates-group-to-lobby-against-the-iran-deal/.

[10] All In with Chris Hayes, "Iraq War proponents campaign against Iran Deal," MSNBC, July 21, 2015, http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/iraq-war-proponents-against-iran-deal-488888387631.

Share RightWeb

Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran Résumé

Contact Information

Phone: 202-549-7670

Email: patrickdorton@nuclearfreeiran.org  

Founded

2015

About

“Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran (CNFI) is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapons capability. CNFI was founded in 2015 in response to concerns surrounding the nuclear negotiations between the P5+1 (the United States, the United Kingdom, China, France, Russia, plus Germany) and Iran. Following public release of the proposed nuclear agreement in July 2015, CNFI began an intensive communications effort to educate the public about the significant flaws and serious consequences of the proposed deal.”

Related:

Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran News Feed

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Soon after a Saudi-led coalition strike on a bus killed 40 children on August 9, a CENTCOM spokesperson stated to Vox, “We may never know if the munition [used] was one that the U.S. sold to them.”


The West has dominated the post-war narrative with its doctrine of liberal values, arguing that not only were they right in themselves but that economic success itself depended on their application. Two developments have challenged those claims. The first was the West’s own betrayal of its principles: on too many occasions the self interest of the powerful, and disdain for the victims of collateral damage, has showed through. The second dates from more recently: the growth of Chinese capitalism owes nothing to a democratic system of government, let alone liberal values.


Falsely demonizing all Muslims, their beliefs, and their institutions is exactly the wrong way to make Americans safer, because the more we scare ourselves with imaginary enemies, the harder it will be to find and protect ourselves from real ones.


Division in the ranks of the conservative movement is a critical sign that a war with Iran isn’t inevitable.


Donald Trump stole the headlines, but the declaration from the recent NATO summit suggests the odds of an unnecessary conflict are rising. Instead of inviting a dialogue, the document boasts that the Alliance has “suspended all practical civilian and military cooperation between NATO and Russia.” The fact is, NATO was a child of the Cold War, when the West believed that the Soviets were a threat. But Russia today is not the Soviet Union, and there’s no way Moscow would be stupid enough to attack a superior military force.


War with Iran may not be imminent, but neither was war with Iraq in late 2001.


Donald Trump was one of the many bets the Russians routinely place, recognizing that while most such bets will never pay off a few will, often in unpredictable ways. Trump’s actions since taking office provide the strongest evidence that this one bet is paying off handsomely for the Russians. Putin could hardly have made the script for Trump’s conduct at the recent NATO meeting any more to his liking—and any better designed to foment division and distrust within the Western alliance—than the way Trump actually behaved.


RightWeb
share