Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Security Initiative

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The American Security Initiative (ASI) was launched in early 2015 by former Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Evan Bayh (D-IN), and Norm Coleman (R-MN). According to Jennifer Rubin, a right-wing “pro-Israel” pundit for the Washington Post, the group was founded with the aim of promoting the controversial Corker-Menendez bill, officially known as the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.[1] ASI’s board of directors consists of Chambliss, Bayh, Coleman, and former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT). 

According to its mission statement, “The American Security Initiative, Inc. is a 501(c)(4) issue advocacy organization dedicated to promoting legislation and urging Americans to stand up for the importance of a strong national security and foreign policy to promote and protect the United States in a challenging global community.”

In March 2015, ASI launched its efforts by sponsoring an ad that took a stringently alarmist tone with respect to Iran’s nuclear program, showing a truck driver in an American city listening to speeches by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just before he detonates an apparent nuclear bomb.[2] The ad ends saying: "Tell Washington. No Iran nuclear deal without Congressional approval."[3] The $500,000 ad spurred intense criticism and all the major networks—with the exception of Fox—refused to air it during their Sunday morning shows.[4]

“So unless we get about the most despised and incompetent institution in American politics to sign off, then we're all going to be vaporized? Best kiss your children goodbye,” quipped one ASI critic.[5] “It is almost as if anti-Iran hawks do not actually believe their own rhetoric, and are seeking to scuttle a deal for a host of reasons—politics, knee-jerk opposition to President Obama, an allergy to diplomacy, desire for a free military hand in the Middle East—that have nothing to do with nuclear weapons.”[6]

In April 2015, ASI spent $650,000 on an ad campaign targeting Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who had not yet co-sponsored the Corker-Menendez bill.[7] At the time, critics argued the bill was meant to derail on-going nuclear negotiations by preventing President Obama from fulfilling U.S. commitments under any would-be deal with Iran.[8] The bill eventually passed in April 2015 after a compromise was reached with the White House allowing Congress to vote on resolutions either approving or rejecting a final nuclear deal with Iran.[9]

In June 2015, shortly before the comprehensive nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 world powers was reached, ASI spent $1.4 million on new TV ads “urging eight senators from both parties to oppose any nuclear deal that doesn’t allow ‘unconditional inspections’ of Iran’s nuclear facilities.” According to POLITICO, the “group clearly has swing Democrats in mind” and the “target list includes Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader in waiting.”[10]

ASI board member Joe Lieberman said of the ad buy: “It was a good time to get out into the discussion and to focus on eight important senators, four from each party, and just say to them: Please make clear to the administration that you’re not going to support an agreement with Iran that does not have additional inspections. If the final agreement does not have that kind of inspection system, then I would do anything I can to urge Congress to reject it.”[11]

After a comprehensive nuclear agreement was reached with Iran in July 2015, ASI launched a new ad blitz that the New York Times stated was “aimed at derailing President Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran.” According to the Times, ASI will be “spending $6.2 million to blanket the airwaves in nine states.”[12]

The Times added: “The investment is being made in conjunction with a group called Veterans Against the Deal, which has already been airing ads, and the campaign will run through early September. … A spokesman for the American Security Initiative said that the group remained open to the possibility of increasing its investment and expanding its campaign this month.”[13]

In 2014, one of the founders of ASI, former Sen. Norm Coleman, became a registered lobbyist for Saudi Arabia through the Hogan Lovells law firm. According to Hogan Lovells, his work involves “providing legal services to the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia” on issues including “policy developments involving Iran.”[14]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources


[1] Jennifer Rubin, “Bipartisan group: Congress should vote on Iran deal,” The Washington Post, March 5, 2015, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/03/05/bipartisan-group-congress-should-vote-on-iran-deal/.



[2] Ryan Cooper, “The hilariously over-the-top fear-mongering of the anti-Iran hawks,” The Week, March 9, 2015, http://theweek.com/articles/542893/hilariously-overthetop-fearmongering-antiiran-hawks.



[3] Ryan Cooper, “The hilariously over-the-top fear-mongering of the anti-Iran hawks,” The Week, March 9, 2015,http://theweek.com/articles/542893/hilariously-overthetop-fearmongering-antiiran-hawks.



[4] Joseph Perticone, “3 Former Senators Want to Run an Ad to Give Congress a Say in Iran Talks—But Networks Are Refusing,” IJReview,



[5] Ryan Cooper, “The hilariously over-the-top fear-mongering of the anti-Iran hawks,” The Week, March 9, 2015,http://theweek.com/articles/542893/hilariously-overthetop-fearmongering-antiiran-hawks.



[6] Ryan Cooper, “The hilariously over-the-top fear-mongering of the anti-Iran hawks,” The Week, March 9, 2015,http://theweek.com/articles/542893/hilariously-overthetop-fearmongering-antiiran-hawks.



[7] Burgess Everett and Kyle Cheney, “PAC targets senators on Iran bill,” Politico, April 9, 2015, http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/pac-targets-senators-on-iran-bill-116839.html.



[8] The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, “Executive Summary: The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015,”http://armscontrolcenter.org/issues/iran/articles/ed_levine_analysis_INARA15_Executive_Summary/.



[9] Robert Satloff, “Clarifying a 'No' Vote on the Iran Nuclear Agreement,” WINEP, August 10, 2015, http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/clarifying-a-no-vote-on-the-iran-nuclear-agreement.



[10] Burgess Everett, “$1.4 million ad buy targets Obama’s Iran Deal,” Politico, June 23, 2015, http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/14-million-ad-buy-targets-obamas-iran-deal-119353.html.



[11] Burgess Everett, “$1.4 million ad buy targets Obama’s Iran Deal,” Politico, June 23, 2015, http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/14-million-ad-buy-targets-obamas-iran-deal-119353.html.



[12] Alan Rappeport and Maggie Haberman, “Bipartisan Group of Ex-Senators to Run Ads Against Iran Deal,” The New York Times, August 12, 2015,http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/12/bipartisan-group-of-ex-senators-to-run-ads-against-iran-deal/.



[13] Alan Rappeport and Maggie Haberman, “Bipartisan Group of Ex-Senators to Run Ads Against Iran Deal,” The New York Times, August 12, 2015,http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/08/12/bipartisan-group-of-ex-senators-to-run-ads-against-iran-deal/.



[14] Lee Fang, “The Saudi Lobbying Complex Adds a New Member: GOP Super PAC Chair Norm Coleman,” The Nation, September 18, 2014,http://www.thenation.com/article/181674/saudi-lobbying-complex-adds-new-member-gop-super-pac-chair-norm-coleman.


From the Wires

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Other than the cynical political interests in Moscow and Tehran, there is no conceivable rationale for wanting Bashar al-Assad to stay in power. But the simple fact is, he has won the war. And while Donald Trump has reveled in positive press coverage of the recent attacks on the country, it is clear that they were little more than a symbolic act.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The reality is that the Assad regime is winning the Syrian civil war, and this matters far less to U.S. interests than it does to that regime or its allies in Russia and Iran, who see Syria as their strongest and most consistent entrée into the Arab world. Those incontrovertible facts undermine any notion of using U.S. military force as leverage to gain a better deal for the Syrian people.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An effective rhetorical tool to normalize military build-ups is to characterize spending increases “modernization.”


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Pentagon has officially announced that that “long war” against terrorism is drawing to a close — even as many counterinsurgency conflicts  rage across the Greater Middle East — and a new long war has begun, a permanent campaign to contain China and Russia in Eurasia.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Revelations that data-consulting firm Cambridge Analytica used ill-gotten personal information from Facebook for the Trump campaign masks the more scandalous reality that the company is firmly ensconced in the U.S. military-industrial complex. It should come as no surprise then that the scandal has been linked to Erik Prince, co-founder of Blackwater.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As the United States enters the second spring of the Trump era, it’s creeping ever closer to more war. McMaster and Mattis may have written the National Defense Strategy that over-hyped the threats on this planet, but Bolton and Pompeo will have the opportunity to address these inflated threats in the worst way possible: by force of arms.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We meet Donald Trump in the media every hour of every day, which blots out much of the rest of the world and much of what’s meaningful in it.  Such largely unexamined, never-ending coverage of his doings represents a triumph of the first order both for him and for an American cult of personality.


RightWeb
share