Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Founded in 2003 by the controversial Muslim-American activist Zuhdi Jasser, the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) is a right-wing advocacy group that describes itself as the “most prominent American Muslim organization confronting the ideologies of political Islam.”[1] Despite having close relations with a network of anti-Islamic groups in the United States, the AIFD is “frequently touted by conservative media as embodying a moderate Muslim perspective.”[2]

As of early 2015, AIFD’s website listed one staff member, Jasser.[3] It also had three board members: Samir Abdelkhalek, a student at the U.S. Military academy; businessman Arif Humayun; and Manda Zand Ervin, a contributor to neoconservative groups like the Center for Security Policy and the Gatestone Institute.[4]

AIFD aims to “intellectually and morally invalidate the Islamist (Muslim supremacist) belief system.” The group argues that the “primary threat to America is from both violent and non-violent Islamists.”[5]

AIFD also seeks to influence the policy debate, stating on its website that it works to “formulate principled positions on specific areas of American foreign and domestic policy as they relate to the vital national interests of the United States and the principles of freedom.”[6]

It is vocal in its support for Israel, stating on its website: “We specifically stand in support and unqualified recognition of the state of Israel and its right to exist behind secure borders as do all free nations. (While as Muslims and American citizens we will take stands on many diverse foreign policy issues, we feel that the recognition of Israel has proven to be one of the litmus tests for Islamist demagoguery).”[7]

AIFD’s founder and president, Zuhdi Jasser, regularly appears on outlets like Fox News, where he delivers far-right talking points about Islam and Muslims. One observer has said of Jasser’s work: "So how is it possible for someone who claims to be a devout Muslim to be an active participant in helping the promotion of anti-Islam sentiment? Therein lies Dr. Jasser's value to this multi-million dollar machine—to play the role of the 'good Muslim.'"[8]

AIFD’s main activity appears to be to publicize Jasser’s interviews and publications, which generally smear the work of leading Muslim civil society organizations. A key target of his attacks has been the Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).[9]

Funding

Jasser and AIFD have received criticism for their close association with a number of hawkish and anti-Islamic individuals and organizations. In 2014, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) revealed that between 2010 and 2012, AIFD received $45,000 from the Abstraction Fund, which has also funded Islamophobic groups like Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch, Steven Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism, and Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy.[10]

AIFD has also received funding from the Daniel Pipes-led Middle East forum, as well as the Alan and Hope Winters Family Fund, which has donated to an array of anti-Islamic groups and also gave AIFD $45,000 between 2010 and 2012.[11] The Klarman Family Foundation, the charitable organization of “pro-Israel” billionaire Seth Klarman that is the primary funder of the hawkish Israel Project, also donates to AFID.  In its 2011 report "Fear, Inc.," the Center for American Progress (CAP) noted that AIFD had received funding from the William Rosenwald Family Fund, which has given millions to anti-Muslim organizations.[12]

The funding AIFD has received from these Islamophobic groups has spurred CAIR to call for an official investigation into Jasser’s membership on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.[13]

In its 2012 Form 990, AIFD reported $340,000 in revenues.[14]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources


[1] AIFD, “About Us,” http://aifdemocracy.org/about/.



[2] Craig Harrington, “Right-Wing Media Attack Ben Affleck For Challenging Islamophobia,” Media Matters, October 7, 2014,http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/10/07/right-wing-media-attack-ben-affleck-for-challen/201057.



[3] AIFD, “Founder/President,” http://aifdemocracy.org/about/staff/founder-president/.



[4] AIFD, “Board Members,” http://aifdemocracy.org/about/board-members/.



[5] AIFD, “Foundational Values,” http://aifdemocracy.org/about/foundational-values/.



[6] AIFD, “Foundational Values,” http://aifdemocracy.org/about/foundational-values/.



[7] AIFD, “Foundational Values,” http://aifdemocracy.org/about/foundational-values/.



[8] Zuhdi Jasser, "The Mainstream Media: Islamist Facilitators," Real Clear Politics, April 20, 2007,http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/04/the_mainstream_media_islamist.html.



[9] Zuhdi Jasser, "The Mainstream Media: Islamist Facilitators," Real Clear Politics, April 20, 2007,http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/04/the_mainstream_media_islamist.html.



[10] CAIR, “'Religious Freedom' Rep Funded by Same Group that Backs Islamophobes,” February 11, 2014, http://www.cair.com/press-center/press-releases/12374-religious-freedom-rep-funded-by-same-group-that-backs-islamophobes.html.



[11] Conservative Transparency, “American Islamic Forum for Democracy,” http://conservativetransparency.org/recipient/american-islamic-forum-for-democracy/.



[12] Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton, “Group linked to Israeli lobby, neocons releases another Islamophobic film,” Electronic Intifada, May 20, 2009,http://electronicintifada.net/content/group-linked-israeli-lobby-neocons-releases-another-islamophobic-film/8246.



[13] CAIR, “'Religious Freedom' Rep Funded by Same Group that Backs Islamophobes,” February 11, 2014, http://www.cair.com/press-center/press-releases/12374-religious-freedom-rep-funded-by-same-group-that-backs-islamophobes.html.



[14] Guidestar, 2012 Form 990, American Islamic Forum for Democracy, http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/710/940/2012-710940051-09e2a78a-9.pdf.


Share RightWeb

American Islamic Forum for Democracy Résumé


Contact Information



Website: http://aifdemocracy.org/



Founded



2003



Mission(as of 2015)



“AIFD seeks to engage in the war of ideas against the ideology of political Islam or Islamism by bringing awareness and education to the general public through writings, media interviews, and public forums.”



Staff(as of 2015)

  • Zuhdi Jasser: Founder and President


Fellows(as of 2015)

  • Arif Humayun

  • Ahmed Vanya


Board Members(as of 2015)

  • Samir Abdelkhalek

  • Arif Humayun

  • Manda Zand Ervin

Related:

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The Trumpian new regional order in the Middle East is predicated on strongman rule, disregard for human rights, Sunni primacy over Iran and other Shia centers of power, continued military support for pro-American warring parties regardless of the unlawfulness of such wars, and Israeli hegemony.


A comparison of U.S. nuclear diplomacy with Iran and the current version with North Korea puts the former in a good light and makes the latter look disappointing. Those with an interest in curbing the dangers of proliferating nuclear weapons should hope that the North Korea picture will improve with time. But whether it does or not, the process has put into perspective how badly mistaken was the Trump administration’s trashing of the Iran nuclear agreement.


Numerous high profile Trump administration officials maintain close ties with anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists. In today’s America, disparaging Islam is acceptable in ways that disparaging other religions is not. Given the continuing well-funded campaigns by the Islamophobes and continuing support from their enablers in the Trump administration, starting with the president himself, it seems unlikely that this trend will be reversed any time soon.


The Trump administration’s nuclear proliferation policy is now in meltdown, one which no threat of “steely resolve”—in Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s words—will easily contain. It is hemorrhaging in part because the administration has yet to forge a strategy that consistently and credibly signals a feasible bottom line that includes living with—rather than destroying—regimes it despises or fears. Political leaders on both sides of the aisle must call for a new model that has some reasonable hope of restraining America’s foes and bringing security to its Middle East allies.


Congressional midterm elections are just months away and another presidential election already looms. Who will be the political leader with the courage and presence of mind to declare: “Enough! Stop this madness!” Man or woman, straight or gay, black, brown, or white, that person will deserve the nation’s gratitude and the support of the electorate. Until that occurs, however, the American penchant for war will stretch on toward infinity.


To bolster the president’s arguments for cutting back immigration, the administration recently released a fear-mongering report about future terrorist threats. Among the potential threats: a Sudanese national who, in 2016, “pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS”; an Uzbek who “posted a threat on an Uzbek-language website to kill President Obama in an act of martyrdom on behalf of ISIS”; a Syrian who, in a plea agreement, “admitted that he knew a member of ISIS and that while in Syria he participated in a battle against the Syrian regime, including shooting at others, in coordination with Al Nusrah,” an al-Qaeda offshoot.


The recent appointment of purveyors of anti-Muslim rhetoric to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom exposes the cynical approach Republicans have taken in promoting religious freedom.


RightWeb
share