Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Committee for Peace in Chechnya

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (formerly the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya) is a Freedom House initiative that bills itself as the ”only private, nongovernmental organization in North America exclusively dedicated to promoting the peaceful resolution of the Russo-Chechen war."[1] According to Freedom House, ACPC “coordinates with an international network of activists, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights and rule of law, to monitor the upward trend of violence in the region, and to promote peace and stability in the North Caucasus.”[2] As of early 2013, the committee appeared to be largely defunct.

Founded in 1999 by U.S. liberal hawks and neoconservatives primarily interested in using the conflict in Chechnya to press an anti-Russian agenda, the ACPC eventually updated its name and broadened its focus after conflicts erupted between Russia and other parts of the Caucasus, including Ingushetia, Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, and North Ossetia.[3]

In early 2013, the committee attracted attention when the suspects in the April 2013 Boston marathon bombing were identified as ethnic Chechens. Although early reports did not indicate that the suspects were driven by Chechen nationalist motivations, some writers questioned whether the FBI had improperly ignored warnings from Russian authorities that one of the alleged bombers had met repeatedly with a suspected terrorist leader in Dagestan.

A writer for Antiwar.com suggested that groups like ACPC had promulgated an anti-Russian bias in Washington that precluded serious consideration of Russian warnings about potential Chechen terrorists. "How did [the bombers] manage to evade the multi-billion dollar 'security apparatus, which was set up with so much fanfare after 9/11? The answer is to be found in the manipulations and odorous alliances dictated by our interventionist foreign policy, a throwback to the cold war era, which has deemed Russia an enemy and the Chechens the Good Guys.”[4]

Noting the neoconservative slant of ACPC’s membership, David Weigel of Slate.com ironically remarked shortly after the Boston bombings that “even neocons were for Chechens before they were against them.” According to Weigel, the ACPC was formed after the start of the second Chechen war in 1999 in an effort to paint Russia as a threat by publicizing atrocities committed by Russian forces in the region.[5] After 9/11, when Putin “presented himself as a natural ally who understood exactly what Americans were going through,” ACPC and colleagues in like-minded journals such as the Weekly Standard warned that U.S. support for Russia’s war in Chechnya would, as one writer put it, jeopardize “our new effort to gain Muslim allies and supporters.”[6]

Commented Weigel: “Gaining Muslim allies—easy to forget, but that was what neoconservatives aspired to after 9/11. Agitating for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and announcing solidarity with non-radicalized Chechens were simultaneous causes. The American Committee had its own specific successes, like an August 2002 peace summit (on the very neutral turf of Lichtenstein). Occasionally these whack-a-mole D.C. ‘letterhead’ groups, the ones that start up to agitate for a cause from a think tank’s spare rooms, score some wins. … The American Committee’s long-term win was preventing Putin from credibly describing everything he did as just another piece of the ‘global war on terror.’”[7]

Shortly after the Boston attack, ubiquitous neoconservative pundit and ACPC supporter Bill Kristol appeared on a conservative Boston-area radio program to discuss U.S.-Russian ties in light of the bombing. Although Kristol conceded that the Russian authorities had offered the United States "a pretty detailed dossier of [bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev's] contacts," he also mused that the Russians are "trying to get us to be suspicious of every Chechen who came to the U.S., especially of everyone who came as a political refugee."[8]

ACPC's activities have included organizing public education programs, developing policy recommendations for lawmakers, and collaborating with activists, journalists, and scholars. It also works closely with a range of nongovernmental policy groups and think tanks, including the American Enterprise Institute and the Jamestown Foundation. At one time, the committee distributed a weekly email news service and newsletter. ACPC's web site contains a news archive, policy papers relating to the U.S. role in the Caucasus, and academic papers, maps, and photos of the conflict.

Glen Howard, the president of the Jamestown Foundation, was ACPC's last listed executive director.[9] Howard previously worked as a military analyst for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a high-tech defense contractor, and has served as a consultant for the Department of Defense, National Intelligence Council, and "major oil companies operating in Central Asia and the Middle East."[10]

The publications of Howard’s two organizations often overlap. For example, the Jamestown Foundation produces North Caucasus Weekly, an ezine that features contributions by ACPC board members.[11] Both groups also work extensively with former Soviet defectors and Chechen dissidents.

As of 2013, ACPC's website did not list its membership or board of directors. But in its American Committee for Peace in Chechnya formation, its board of directors was co-chaired by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alexander M. Haig, Jr., Steven J. Solarz, and the late Max Kampelman. The committee's more than 100 listed members reflected a wide political spectrum, including such figures as Richard Gere, Morton Ambramowitz, and Geraldine Ferraro. However, membership was overwhelmingly hawkish, and many high-profile neoconservatives, some associated with the Project for the New American Century, featured on its membership rolls, including Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Elliott Abrams, Midge Decter, William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, and James Woolsey, among others.[12]

ACPC supported the Chechen rebel movement, apparently as a strategy to weaken Russia and establish better U.S. ties in a region of increasing geopolitical value, which has vast, unexploited natural resource reserves including rich oil, gas, and hard mineral deposits.[13]


In 2002-2003, Freedom House received $275,000 for ACPC from the Smith Richardson Foundation.[14]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.


[1] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about.htm

[2] Freedom House,  “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://www.freedomhouse.org/program/russia-north-caucus

[3] American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, “About ACPC,” http://www.peaceinthecaucasus.org/about

[4] Justin Raimondo, "The Russians Warned Us – Why Didn’t We Listen?" Antiwar.com, April 24, 2013, http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/04/23/the-russians-warned-us-why-didnt-we-listen/.

[5] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html

[6] Quoted byin David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

[7] David Weigel, “We Are All Russians Now,” Slate.com, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html

[8] Quoted in David Weigel, "We Are All Russians Now," Slate, April 22, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/russia_warned_the_fbi_about_tamerlan_tsarnaev_how_american_neocons_originally.html.

[9] See ACPC, "About," archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050404123934/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_staff.htm.

[10] See Jamestown Foundation, "Staff," http://www.jamestown.org/aboutus/staff/.

[11] The Jamestown Foundation, “North Caucasus Analysis,” http://www.jamestown.org/programs/nca/

[12] American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, “Members,” archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20050407171752/http://www.peaceinchechnya.org/about_members.htm.

[13] The Jamestown Foundation, Chechnya Weekly for March 9, 16, and 23, 2005, http://www.jamestown.org/publications_view.php?publication_id=1.

[14] Media Transparency, “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus,” http://mediamattersaction.org/transparency/organization/Freedom_House/funders

Share RightWeb

American Committee for Peace in Chechnya Résumé


Contact Information

The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus
Freedom House
1301 Connecticut Ave., NW, Floor 6
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 296-5101
Email: acpc@peaceinthecaucasus.org



About (as of 2013)

"The American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), a project of Freedom House, coordinates with an international network of human rights and democracy advocates, journalists, scholars and nongovernmental organizations to advocate for and support human rights in the North Caucasus. ACPC is dedicated to monitoring developments in the region and providing expert analysis of their implications for security, stability and the human rights situation. In the aftermath of the two Chechen Wars and in the face of the ongoing violence across the region, ACPC strives to ensure access to information from the North Caucasus for the international policymaking and NGO community."

Selected Principals (as of 2013)


American Committee for Peace in Chechnya News Feed

We Are All Russians Now - Slate MagazineHuman Rights Council begins general debate on human rights situations that require the Council's attention - Democratic People's Republic of Korea - ReliefWebGay Purges, Weaponized Shame, and Reimagining Chechnya to Keep Kadyrov in Power - Polygraph.infoChechnya Prominent Activists Detained Protesting for Chechen Human Rights Leader Svetlana Gannushkina and Oleg Orlov were - The Moscow TimesWill Chechnya Detonate Russia? - The American InterestSyria, Then and Now: Liberated of Western-backed Terrorism - Mintpress News'The Enemy Is Dead': Russia Reacts to US Senator John McCain's Passing - The Moscow TimesChechen Terrorists and the Neocons - Consortium NewsBritain wages information war against Russia - The EconomistSyria, Then and Now - Dissident VoiceThe Brawl of Civilizations? A Tale of a Mixed Martial Arts Fighter from Dagestan - Foreign Policy Research InstituteChechnya a 'Model of Peace and Harmony' Says Kadyrov - The Moscow TimesAn Uber-Hawk Flies High Again in Trump's Washington - The American ConservativeChechen president receives Saudi Royal Court Advisor Prince Turki bin Fahd - Al-Arabiya2018 World Cup offers Chechnya opportunity to play Middle Eastern politics - Modern DiplomacyD.C. cyclists killed in Islamic State-claimed attack in former Soviet Central Asia - The Washington PostSaudi Arabia strongly condemns attack on church in Russia's Chechnya republic - Al-ArabiyaWhy Salah's meeting with Chechen leader has stirred controversy - Al-ArabiyaA Tale of Two Interventions: Russia and the US Face Off in Syria - smallwarsjournalIN PICTURES: Saudi Crown Prince receives Chechen President Kadyrov - Al-Arabiya

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The Senate on Wednesday passed a measure mandating the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Saudi/UAE-led war against Houthi rebels in Yemen. The vote marks the first time since the War Powers Act of 1973 became law that both chambers of Congress have directed the president to withdraw American forces from a conflict.

The Trump administration’s failed “maximum pressure” approach to Iran and North Korea begs the question what the US president’s true objectives are and what options he is left with should the policy ultimately fail.

In the United States, it’s possible to debate any and every policy, domestic and foreign, except for unquestioning support for Israel. That, apparently, is Ilhan Omar’s chief sin.

While Michael Cohen mesmerized the House of Representatives and President Trump resumed his love affair with North Korea’s Kim Jong, one of the most dangerous state-to-state confrontations, centering in Kashmir, began to spiral out of control.

The Trump administration’s irresponsible withdrawal from the landmark Iran nuclear agreement undermined Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and emboldened hardliners who accused him of having been deceived by Washington while negotiating the agreement. However, the Iranian government could use the shock of Zarif’s resignation to push back against hardliners and take charge of both the domestic and foreign affairs of the country while Iran’s foreign opponents should consider the risks of destabilizing the government under the current critical situation.

Europe can play an important role in rebuilding confidence in the non-proliferation regime in the wake of the demise of the INF treaty, including by making it clear to the Trump administration that it wants the United States to refrain from deploying INF-banned missiles in Europe and to consider a NATO-Russian joint declaration on non-first deployment.

The decline in Israel’s appeal to Democrats is directly related to the wider awareness of the country’s increasingly authoritarian nature, its treatment of Palestinians, and its reluctance to take substantive steps toward peace. Pro-Israel liberals face a fundamental paradox trying to reconcile Israel’s illiberalism with their political values.