Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

American Center for Democracy

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Print Friendly

The American Center for Democracy (ACD) is a Manhattan-based nonprofit that claims to be “exposing and monitoring threats to the national security of the U.S. and Western democracies.”[1] Although the center has hosted a number of scholars and fellows, it appears to serve primarily as a publishing vehicle for neoconservative writer and activist Rachel Ehrenfeld, its founder and director.

A flagship project of the center is its Economic Warfare Institute (EWI), which is devoted to identifying “emerging economic warfare tactics and finance threats,” including “terror financing, political corruption, emerging narcoterrorist movements  (i.e. the fusion of the drug trade with terrorism), [and] international terrorist organizations.”[2]

The EWI is associated with Ehrenfeld’s often controversial work on terrorism financing, the subject of her 2003 book Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It. The accuracy of the book was questioned by reviewers[3] and eventually became the subject of a libel lawsuit. The lawsuit resulted in a British court ordering Ehrenfeld to pay damages to a Saudi businessman she had accused of supporting al-Qaeda.

The case spurred Ehrenfeld to launch a campaign against “libel tourism,” which became the focus of another flagship ACD project. This project aims to insulate Americans from libel charges filed abroad, particularly in the United Kingdom, and has inspired both state and federal legislation blocking the enforcement of British libel rulings by U.S. authorities. Former Sen. Joe Lieberman, a longtime neoconservative heavyweight, was a major backer of what came to be known as “Rachel’s Law,”[4] a federal version of which was ultimately signed into law in 2010.

The underlying assumption of ACD's terrorism analysis is that private and public corruption permits international organized crime to flourish, providing a nesting place for terrorist networks. ACD supports initiatives that assess foreign political corruption, elections, and cybersecurity. It also publishes a blog largely populated by Ehrenfeld’s writings on these issues.

Islamic terrorism is the primary concern of ACD’s work. A former ACD project, "Economic Jihad," was billed as "an ongoing effort to expose the radical Muslim Economic and Financial jihad against the United States and the West." The project's work was published on the ACD website and on the "Terror Finance blog," which was edited by former ACD researcher Ilan Weinglass.[5] In more recent writings, Ehrenfeld has warned about “Islamic banking,” which she claims was developed by the Muslim Brotherhood “to penetrate the Western finance system, corrupting it from within in hopes of creating a parallel system to re-establish a global Islamic empire governed by Islamic law.”[6]

Ehrenfeld is a proponent of U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war, arguing in a May 2013 blog post that President Barack Obama’s reluctance to intervene in the conflict was somehow driving the violence. “Sitting on his hands for two years, doing nothing to stop the atrocities in Syria, Obama seem[s] to have encouraged Assad to use heavy military weapons, such as attack helicopters and tanks against innocent civilians,” she wrote. She concluded, “Obama’s attempt to pacify the Muslim/Arab world, beginning with his Cairo speech in 2009, seem to have yielded catastrophic results. … [T]he Oslo Committee should change his ‘Peace Award’ with the ‘Sitting on the Fence Award.’”[7]

Ehrenfeld has also promoted the notion that the United States is vulnerable to attack from an “electromagnetic pulse” (EMP) attack, which proponents—including the Heritage Foundation, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and Newt Gingrich—say could be launched by a hostile power exploding a nuclear weapon in the stratosphere over the United States. In a blog post hyping a May 2013 Wall Street Journal op-ed by ACD board member James Woolsey, Ehrenfeld claimed that both North Korea and Iran “present a real threat of an EMP attack. Both rogue states have the technical know-how and, as importantly, their leaderships have shown themselves willing and capable of irrational behavior.” Such an attack, she claimed, “will not only devastate the economy, but also cause the death of millions of Americans.”[8] A writerfor Foreign Policy subsequently described the EMP scenario as “a wild claim” peddled by a “crowd of cranks and threat inflators.”[9]

Presaging the work of conservative scholars like Matthew Levitt, Ehrenfeld has long argued that Islamic radicals and left-wing South American terrorists have close working relations, including in her 1992 book Evil Money. When challenged to prove her claims, however, Ehrenfeld has said that she can't reveal her sources because they are classified, as Michael Massing pointed out in a review of the book for the New York Review of Books and a subsequent exchange of letters. "In Evil Money,” he wrote, “Ms. Ehrenfeld makes a series of sensational claims—that Sierra Leone has become 'an international terrorist center,' that BCCI 'cemented the symbiotic relationship between Peruvian terrorists and drug traffickers,' that Abu Nidal trained Shining Path members in urban guerrilla warfare, helping to set up a 'dormant terrorist infrastructure' in the United States. In my review, I noted how little evidence Ms. Ehrenfeld offered to back up these claims."[10]

Ehrenfeld, an Israeli-American, is a member of the Committee on the Present Dangerand has a doctorate in criminology from the Hebrew University School of Law. She serves on the International Advisory Council of the Intelligence Summit, which provides a forum for intelligence and military officials interested in "fighting terrorism." Tom McInerney and Paul Vallely, two other Intelligence Summit advisory board members, also sit on ACD's advisory board.

Other ACD fellows have included Economic Warfare Institute director Kenneth D.M. Jensen, former State Department official J. Millard Burr, former IDF intelligence adviser Jonathan Dahoah Halevi, consultant Leslie Lebl, columnist Domagoj Margetic, researcher Ganesh Sahathevan, Playfair Group CEO John Wood, and former Lockheed Martin engineer Robert Zubrin.[11] Its board of directors includes former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Reagan-era Defense Department official Richard Perle, defense researcher Nicholas Rostow, Tapestry Pharmaceuticals CEO Leonard P. Shaykin, and former CIA director James Woolsey. Alongside McInerney and Vallely, ACD’s advisory board has included Jean-Charles Brisard, Kevin D. Freeman, Gal Luft, Harvey Stone, Dmitry Radyshevsky of the Jerusalem Summit, and “Islamophobic” funder Nina Rosenwald, who heads the Gatestone Institute.[12]

In 2011, ACD—which is classified by the IRS as a “recreational” organization—reported roughly $700,000 in net assets.[13]

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.


[1] ACD, Mission Statement, http://acdemocracy.org/mission/.

[2] Economic Warfare Institute, “Our Mission,” http://econwarfare.org/about/.

[3] Michael Massing, “Evil Money: Peter Dale Scott and Rachel Ehrenfeld, reply by Michael Massing,” The New York Review of Books website, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1993/mar/04/evil-money/?pagination=false

[4] Eric Pfanner, “Unlikely Allies Say U.K. Libel Laws Limit Speech,” New York Times, May 24, 2009, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/business/media/25iht-libel.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&.

[5] The Terror Finance Blog, “Contributing Experts,” The Terror Finance Blog website, http://www.terrorfinance.org/about.html.

[6] Rachel Ehrenfeld and Samuel A. Abady, “Islamic Banking,” Washington Times, December 11, 2008, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/11/islamic-banking/.

[7] Rachel Ehrenfeld, “Obama’s Seat on the Fence,” ACD, May 4, 2013, http://acdemocracy.org/obamas-seat-on-the-fence/.

[8] Rachel Ehrenfeld, “U.S. Vulnerabilities to EMP Attack,” ACD, May 22, 2013, http://acdemocracy.org/u-s-vulnerabilities-to-emp-attack/.

[9] Jeffrey Lewis, “The EMPire Strikes Back,” Foreign Policy, May 23, 2013, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/05/23/the_empire_strikes_back_emp?page=full.

[10] Michael Massing, “Evil Money: Peter Dale Scott and Rachel Ehrenfeld, reply by Michael Massing,” The New York Review of Books website, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1993/mar/04/evil-money/?pagination=false.

[11] ACD, “Our Team,” http://acdemocracy.org/ourteam/.

[12] ACD, “Board of Directors and Advisers,” http://acdemocracy.org/board/.

[13] Guidestar.org, ACD profile, 2011 990, http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2011/522/305/2011-522305540-091d3d99-F.pdf.

Share RightWeb

American Center for Democracy Résumé

Contact Information

American Center for Democracy

30 W. 56th Street #24E

New York, NY 10019-4235




Mission Statement (as of 2013)

“The American Center for Democracy (ACD) is dedicated to exposing and monitoring threats to the national security of the U.S. and Western democracies. Applying the political, counter-terror, law enforcement, and technological capabilities of its fellows and affiliated entities, ACD focuses on exposing economic warfare, terror financing, political corruption, links among drug traffickers, and international terrorist organizations and their sponsoring states, as well as the intimidation of the free press practiced wittingly by terrorists and their allies, and unwittingly by some in the West in the name of political correctness.”

Board of Directors (as of 2013)

  • Rachel Ehrenfeld

  • Richard Perle

  • James Woolsey

  • Michael Mukasey

  • Nicholas Rostow

  • Leonard Shaykin

Board of Advisors (as of 2013)

  • Jean-Charles Brisard

  • Kevin D. Freeman

  • Gal Luft

  • Thomas McInerney

  • Dmitry Radyshevsky

  • Harvey M. Stone

  • Paul E. Vallely


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

New NSA John Bolton represents an existential threat to the Iran nuclear deal and any hopes for peace in the region.

Print Friendly

Hardliners at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies are working overtime to convince the Trump administration to “fix” the nuclear agreement with Iran on the pretext that it will give the US leverage in negotiations with North Korea.

Print Friendly

North Korea and Iran both understand the lesson of Libya: Muammar Qaddafi, a horrifyingly brutal dictator, gave up his nuclear weapons, was eventually ousted from power with large-scale US assistance, and was killed. However, while Iran has a long and bitter history with the United States, North Korea’s outlook is shaped by its near-total destruction by forces led by the United States in the Korean War.

Print Friendly

Europe loathes having to choose between Tehran and Washington, and thus it will spare no efforts to avoid the choice. It might therefore opt for a middle road, trying to please both parties by persuading Trump to retain the accord and Iran to limit missile ballistic programs and regional activities.

Print Friendly

Key members of Trump’s cabinet should recognize the realism behind encouraging a Saudi- and Iranian-backed regional security agreement because the success of such an agreement would not only serve long-term U.S. interests, it could also have a positive impact on numerous conflicts in the Middle East.

Print Friendly

Given that Israel failed to defeat Hezbollah in its war in Lebanon in 2006, it’s difficult to imagine Israel succeeding in a war against both Hezbollah and its newfound regional network of Shiite allies. And at the same time not only is Hezbollah’s missile arsenal a lot larger and more dangerous than it was in 2006, but it has also gained vast experience alongside its allies in offensive operations against IS and similar groups.

Print Friendly

Donald Trump should never be excused of responsibility for tearing down the respect for truth, but a foundation for his flagrant falsifying is the fact that many people would rather be entertained, no matter how false is the source of their entertainment, than to confront truth that is boring or unsatisfying or that requires effort to understand.