Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Edwin Meese III


    • Heritage Foundation: Distinguished Visiting Fellow 
    • Hoover Institution: Distinguished Visiting Fellow 
    • Committee on the Present Danger: Member 
    • U.S. Attorney General (1985-1988)



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

One of President Ronald Reagan's closest advisors whose tenure as Reagan's attorney general was dogged by allegations of influence peddling and bribery, Edwin Meese has been a consummate campaigner on behalf of rightist U.S. foreign and domestic policies.[1]

Meese’s advocacy track record includes being a cofounder of the influential conservative legal group the Federalist Society; serving as a fellow at two core rightist policy organizations, the Heritage Foundation and the Hoover Institution; and serving as a member of the neoconservative-aligned Committee on the Present Danger, (CPD) a Cold War era group that re-emerged after 9/11 to push for an expansive “war on terror.” Meese was quoted on the CPD website, saying: "Asymmetrical warfare waged by terrorists presents the greatest threat to the U.S. homeland in nearly two centuries. The historical perspective and strategic thinking of the Committee on the Present Danger, so effective during the Cold War, is needed for the Global War On Terrorism."[2]

Only a few months into President Barack Obama’s second year in the White House, Meese spearheaded an advocacy campaign aimed at warning the country that the existence of the United States was in jeopardy because of a dizzying array of purported threats, including unsecure borders, Shariah law, and unlawful combatants.

To publicize these threats, Meese and seven coauthors published an op-ed in the right-wing Washington Times in May 2010 that called for a “renewed adherence to the national security philosophy of President Ronald Reagan: ‘Peace Through Strength.’” Meese’s coauthors were Frank Gaffney (Center for Security Policy), Clifford May (Foundation for the Defense of Democracies), Elaine Donnelly (Center for Military Readiness), Brian Kennedy (Claremont Institute), Herbert London (Hudson Foundation), and Herman Pirchner (American Foreign Policy Council).[3]

The coauthors and several other Republican Party figures subsequently launched an online advocacy campaign called “The Peace Through Strength Platform.” The website claimed that in a world “characterized by growing threats to freedom and the U.S. Constitution, America’s exceptional role, and indeed our country’s very existence, is at risk.”[4]

To address these “risks,” campaign supporters reiterated the 10-point platform initially laid out by Meese and his coauthors in the Washington Times: 1) Renewed adherence to the national security philosophy of President Ronald Reagan: “Peace Through Strength”; 2) A robust defense posture including a safe, reliable effective nuclear deterrent; 3) Preservation of U.S. sovereignty against international treaties; 4) A nation free of Shariah law; 5) Protection from unlawful enemy combatants; 6) Energy security; 7) Borders secure against penetration by terrorists, narco-traffickers or others seeking to enter the United States illegally; 8) High standards that protect the military culture essential to the All-Volunteer Force; 9) A foreign policy that supports our allies and opposes our adversaries; 10) Judicial and educational institutions that uphold the constitutional responsibility of elected officials to make policy for our military and convey to future generations accurate portrayals of American history, including the necessity of defending freedom.[5]

"Lenin"

Meese got his start working on the staff of then-Governor Ronald Reagan in California during the 1960s and 1970s. After Reagan was elected president, Meese was tapped to serve initially as the counsellor to the president and on the National Security Council. When Reagan was re-elected, Meese became attorney general. Meese stepped down as attorney general before the end of Reagan's second term as numerous legal scandals erupted regarding alleged political and financial irregularities.

Describing Meese’s relationship to Reagan and impact on U.S. conservative politics, Salon.com once quipped, "If Robert Bork was the conservative legal counterrevolution's Marx, its Lenin, its great tactician, was a California lawyer named Edwin Meese, Governor Ronald Reagan's closest advisor."[6]

A principal tactic employed by Meese in his efforts to push through hardline public policies was to stack the judiciary with like-minded ideologues. As part of these efforts, Meese and several friends and colleagues—Including Robert Bork and future Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist—helped establish the Federalist Society in 1982, which today is regarded as one of the most influential non-governmental groups in the United States. [7]

Reports Salon, "Meese, Rehnquist and their allies ... wanted their counterrevolution to prevail over the long haul: not just from the top down but at the legal grass roots. They wanted the future, not just the present, and that meant focusing on law schools. ... So in 1982, Meese, Rehnquist and other first-generation legal conservatives reached out to law students and encouraged the founding of a new organization: the Federalist Society. Funded generously by Richard Mellon Scaife and patrons, the Federalist Society became a national networking organization that nurtured young conservatives and swiftly became a crucial channel to Supreme Court clerkships and prestigious jobs in the Reagan administration. In 'Closed Chambers,' former clerk Lazarus outlines how Federalist Society clerks formed a self-described 'cabal against the libs' to push justices in a rightward direction. Conservative donors like Scaife were encouraged to endow professorships and to fund conferences and training institutes to tutor judges in corporate deregulation and other articles of conservative legal faith."[8]

Scandals

During his tunure as attorney general, Meese was dogged by a number of allegations of bribery and influence peddling. In one case, an independent prosecutor was appointed to investigate alleged financial improprieties by Meese while he was attorney general. As part of the investigation, the prosecutor looked into Meese's involvement in a Bechtel pipeline deal in Iraq. One of the dealmakers for the pipeline project was Donald Rumsfeld. According to the New York Times, "[Bechtel] has a long history of doing business in Iraq, including an unsuccessful pipeline deal that at one point involved a meeting between Donald H. Rumsfeld, now the secretary of defense, and Saddam Hussein. That project later drew scrutiny from a special prosecutor looking into allegations of impropriety involving Edwin A. Meese III, the former White House counsel and attorney general in the Reagan administration." Meese's involvement in the Bechtel deal revolved around his relationship with E. Robert Wallach, a lawyer close to the attorney general who was hired by Bechtel to help negotiate with the Israeli government. Although he was not prosecuted, Meese ultimately resigned.[9]

An online reference source, American Decades, describes Meese's record thusly, "No other member of the Reagan administration, with the exception of Oliver North, was as tainted by scandal as Edwin Meese III. Certainly, no other Reagan official was more disliked, both within the administration and on Capitol Hill, though Reagan himself called Meese his 'alter ego.' At one point in his tenure as attorney general Meese was under investigation by three special prosecutors, each inquiring into separate allegations of influence peddling, bribery, and cover-up in the Iran-Contra affair. Though Meese was never charged with any crime, the last of the special investigators said that Meese 'had probably broken conflict of interest and income-tax laws, though none of the indictments were worthy of prosecution.' This statement provoked outrage and derision among congressional staffers who had helped to build cases against Meese, for its logic supposed that the nation's chief law enforcement officer was to be held to a lower standard of conduct than ordinary citizens. Though Meese had figured in virtually every imbroglio of the Reagan administration, like the president himself he was able to shed charges of personal culpability. Nevertheless, the 'sleaze factor' emerging from the Reagan presidency jeopardized, but did not undermine, the election campaign of Vice President George Bush in 1988, which feared the political capital to be gained by Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis."



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

Edwin Meese III Résumé

    Affiliations 

    • Committee on the Present Danger: Member 
    • Heritage Foundation: Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow in Public Policy 
    • Hoover Institution: Distinguished Visiting Fellow
    • Federalist Society: Cofounder



    Government Service

    • U.S. Attorney General (1985-1988)
    • Counsellor to the President (1981-1985)
    • National Security Council: Former Member
    • Governor Ronald Reagan's Executive Assistant/Chief of Staff (1969-1974)

     

    Business

    • SMALLCap Fund, Inc.: Director (as of June 2003)
    • Central European Value Fund: Director (as of December 1999)
    • Carrington Laboratories: Director (as of June 2003)
    • Peregrine Control Technologies: Former director
    • Bechtel: Investigated in the 1980s for his alleged role in a Bechtel pipeline deal in Iraq

     

    Education

    • Yale University: B.A. (1953)
    • University of California at Berkeley: Law degree
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1] Heritage Foundation, “Edwin Meese,” http://www.heritage.org/About/Staff/M/Edwin-Meese .

[2] http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/index.php?option=com_cpdteam&id=1677&Itemid=89

[3] Meese et al, “Restoring Peace through Strength,” Washington Times, May 11, 2010, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/11/restoring-peace-through-strength/.

[4] http://peacethroughstrength.com/ 

[5] http://peacethroughstrength.com/ 

[6] Bruce Shapiro, "True Believer," Salon.com, July, 3, 1998, http://www.salon.com/news/1998/07/03news.html.

[7] ibid.

[8] ibid.

[9] "Bechtel Has Ties to Washington, and to Iraq," New York Times, April 18, 2003

Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org