Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Mark Falcoff


[![Alternative text]!]
    • American Enterprise Institute: Fellow Emeritus
    • Hoover Institution: Former Fellow

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Mark Falcoff is a fellow emeritus at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) whose writings on Latin American affairs are published in a number of neoconservative and right-wing outlets, including Family Security Matters (FSM), the American Spectator, and the National Review.[1] During the 1980s, Falcoff was an active supporter of the Nicaraguan Contras and a member of the Friends of the Democratic Center in Central America (PRODEMCA), a National Endowment for Democracy-funded organization that channeled U.S. aid to anti-Sandinista political forces.[2] Falcoff’s experience also includes working as a staffer on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the 1980s and as a fellow at the Hoover Institution. Until 2004, Falcoff authored AEI's Latin American Outlook, which was later overseen by Roger Noriega.[3]

According to his brief biography on the website of the conservative Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs: “Dr. Falcoff came to the American Enterprise Institute in 1981 after a term (1979-1980) as a National Fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. In 1983, he served as Senior Consultant to the National Bipartisan Commission on Central America, which was chaired by former Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger. Subsequently, he joined the staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (1986-87) and the Council of Foreign Relations (1987-88), where he was a Visiting Fellow and directed a study group on Chile.Dr. Falcoff graduated with honors and a bachelor of science in political science from the University of Missouri in 1963, and earned both a Master of Arts degree and Doctor of Philosophy from Princeton University.He has taught at the University of Illinois, University of Oregon, University of California, Los Angeles, and the U.S. Foreign Service Institute.”[4]

In 2003, Falcoff served on the U.S. Delegation to the 2003 U.N. Human Rights Commission in Geneva. Falcoff called “the right to food, the right to clean air, the right to proper disposal of toxic wastes” as “confected, rights that can exist only on paper.” He advocated for “eliminating so-called NGO participation [at the UN Human Rights Commission], which adds absolutely nothing to the deliberations.” He also argued that the U.S. delegation should abandon the commission, saying: “The worst thing you can do—from a career diplomat’s point of view—is to walk away from a commission. But that, I submit, is precisely what we should be doing.”[5]

Falcoff’s more recent work has included publishing articles discussing leftist leaders in Latin America and U.S. history. In a June 2011 article for National Review Online, Falcoff commented on the potential demise of Venezuela President Hugo Chavez, who had recently travelled to Cuba to undergo cancer treatment. Discusing Chavez’s legacy, Falcoff wrote: “While Chávez has tried to cobble together an ideology that utilizes a Marxist vocabulary and some fragments of Lenin’s theory of imperialism, it is not recognizably Marxist in practice. The Venezuelan president has hardly bothered to form a serious party of his own. He even allows opposition parties to function, much as the late Argentine dictator Juan Perón did, and for much the same reason—namely, he knows they cannot win an election on their own. And like Perón, he even finds it convenient to periodically make deals with corrupt members of the business class. Whatever this is, it is not a replica of the Cuban experience, and the Cuban leadership recognizes as much.”[6]

One result of Chavez’s leadership style, opined Falcoff, is that in the event of his death, Venezuela will “In the best of cases … be ungovernable, poisoned by the legend of what might have been (‘if only Chávez had lived’); in the worst, it will collapse into civil war. The most likely immediate outcome is a kind of military dictatorship, which by the way is also what awaits Cuba after the Castro brothers leave the scene. What its ideological coloration will be, what foreign- and domestic-policy choices it makes, are beyond prediction. But Venezuelans have good reason to fear the future.”

Falcoff's books include Panama's Canal: What Happens When the United States Gives a Small Country What It Wants and A Culture of Its Own: Taking Latin America Seriously, 1998. His books The Cuban Revolution and the United States, 2001 and Cuba the Morning After, warn of potential threats to the United States when the Castro regime ends.



Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

  • digg.com
  • delicious.com
  • newsvine.com/
  • stumbleupon.com/
Close

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

Mark Falcoff Résumé

    Affiliations

    • American Enterprise Institute: Scholar Emeritus; Resident Scholar, 1981-2004
    • Hoover Institution: National Fellow, 1979-1980
    • Council on Foreign Relations: Visiting Fellow, 1987-1988
    • Freedom House: Former Member of the Working Group on Central American Democracy
    • Universities of Illinois, Oregon, and California at Los Angeles: Faculty Member, 1969-1981


    Government

    • U.S. Delegation to the U.N. Human Rights Commission: Member, 2003
    • Senate Foreign Relations Committee: Staff, 1986-1988
    • National Bipartisan Commission on Central America: Senior Consultant 1983

     

    Education

    • University of Missouri: B.A., Political Science
    • Princeton University: M.A.. Political Science
    • Princeton University: Ph.D., Political Science
Mark Falcoff News Feed

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1] American Spectator, “Mark Falcoff,” http://spectator.org/people/mark-falcoff/all;  National Review, “Mark Falcoff,” http://www.nationalreview.com/author/228698;  FSM, “Mark Falcoff,”http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.158/author_detail.asp.

[2] Sara Diamond, Roads to Dominion, Guilford Press, New York, 1995, p. 382.

[3] American Enterprise Institute, “Mark Falcoff,” http://www.aei.org/scholar/mark-falcoff/.

[4] Ashbrook Center, “Mark Falcoff,” http://www.ashbrook.org/events/lecture/1990/falcoff.html.

[5] Mark Falcoff, “The United Nations Human Rights Commission,” AEI, May 7, 2003, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/907329/posts.

[6] Mark Falcoff, “After Chavez,” National Review Online, June 29, 2011, http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/270732.

Latest Feature Articles
Will Israeli Dissent Halt the March towards War?

Jim Lobe | May 03, 2012

Tensions have been reaching near fevered pitch over Iran’s nuclear program as Israeli leaders and their supporters in the United States have pressed for military action to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. However, a number of factors have been working against the hawks, including recent progress at the P5+1 talks and the lack of enthusiasm for another conflict among a war-weary U.S. public. In recent weeks, a new force has emerged that seems to have made the threat of war even less imminent—the unprecedented wave of dissent from current and former top Israeli officials.

The Militarization of the Syrian Uprising

Samer Araabi | April 18, 2012

As pressure mounts to arm rebels in Syria, there is need for a sober assessment of the costs and consequences of the increasing militarization of the conflict there. If history is any guide, a foreign-backed armed rebellion will likely not produce the kind of victory—or engender the kind of support—that the anti-Assad fighters will require to usher in a new Syria. Additionally, there is the very real possibility that many of the rebels—as we’ve seen in Libya—will turn out to be little better than the regime they seek to replace.

Obama to Pro-Israel Lobby Group: ‘Too Much Loose Talk of War’

Mitchell Plitnick | March 05, 2012

Before a skeptical audience of delegates from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, President Obama affirmed U.S-Israeli ties and challenged detractors to impugn his administration’s record of support for the Jewish state. However, while insisting that that the United States would consider military options in the event of Iran’s developing a nuclear weapon, he also warned Israeli allies of “loose talk” about war, which Obama said only empowers the Iranian regime and decreases prospects for a diplomatic solution.

Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org