Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Concerned Women for America

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Concerned Women for America (CWA) is a right-wing Christian advocacy group and lobbying outfit based in Washington, DC. With over half a million members, the group bills itself as “the nation's largest public policy women's organization" and boasts "a rich 30-year history of helping members across the country bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy."[1] Through grassroots mobilization, publications, and legislative pressure, CWA pushes right-wing viewpoints on social, economic, and foreign policy issues. Affiliated organizations include the Beverly LaHaye Institute, CWA’s “think tank” arm; the CWA Legislative Action Committee, its lobbying arm; and the Concerned Women PAC, which supports political candidates directly.

CWA was founded in San Diego in 1979 by Beverly LaHaye, a social conservative activist and spouse of Moral Majority cofounder Tim LaHaye. LaHaye—who fashioned CWA as a Christian conservative counterweight to left-leaning feminist groups like the National Organization for Women (NOW)—has said that she decided to launch CWA after seeing an interview in which NOW founder Betty Friedan “claimed to speak for the women of America.” According to CWA’s website, LaHaye was “stirred to action” because she “knew the feminists’ anti-God, anti-family rhetoric did not represent her beliefs, nor those of the vast majority of women.”[2]

The group has pushed a plethora of Christian right causes over the years, including criminalizing abortion, banning same-sex marriage, and rolling back sex education for students.  Its work on these issues has at times taken on an international dimension. For example, CWA attracted controversy in 2013 and 2014 for seeming to offer its support for antigay legislation in Russia[3] and for criticizing President Obama’s characterization of the notorious Ugandan “kill the gays” bill as an abuse of “human rights.” (Although the group declined to endorse the Ugandan bill itself, executive director Janice Shaw Crouse saved her vitriol for Obama, writing, “Claiming that homosexuality is a ‘human right’ is an affront—even a mockery—of those Judeo-Christian values that have been the foundation of virtually all Western civilizations across time and cultures.”)[4]

CWA works on array of issues besides traditional social concerns. For instance, among its seven “core issues” is “support for Israel” (the others are “sanctity of life,” “defense of family,” “education,” “religious liberty,” “national sovereignty,” and “sexual exploitation”).[5]

Although CWA is putatively focused on the United States, “support for Israel” has been an official “core issue” since May 2013, when its board of directors unanimously voted to count the “threat of global terrorism and the movement in the Middle East to squelch the nation of Israel” and purported “increased anti-Israel sentiment within our government” among its key concerns. “The biggest catalyst” for the Israel vote, CWA CEO Penny Nance told neoconservative blogger Jennifer Rubin, was that “our Founder, Beverly LaHaye, wanted to codify it in our core values. We have always been supportive but this is more formal.” Mentioning that she had been to Israel recently herself, Nance added, “I now know how absolutely essential support from the U.S. is to the continued existence of Israel and how essential Israel is to stability of the entire region.” Rubin, who dubbed the decades-old CWA “a strong new player in the pro-Israel community,” gushed that CWA’s announcement was “further proof that to be recognized as a conservative leader and to get electoral support from the right these days, Israel is a litmus test.”[6]

As part of its “pro-Israel” advocacy, CWA backed efforts to impose new sanctions on Iran while international negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear enrichment program were underway. “As the administration works to achieve a final agreement we must continue the pressure,” Penny Young Nance wrote in a letter distributed on Capitol Hill by CWA's lobbying arm, adding that the group “reserves the right to include all floor votes in our annual scorecard.”[7] Critics said the sanctions—which were introduced by Sens. Mark Kirk and Robert Menendez and vigorously backed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)—were actually designed to sink the negotiations altogether. (Despite CWA’s support for Kirk’s sanctions bill, it hasn’t always enjoyed warm relations with the strongly “pro-Israel” senator. After Kirk withdrew his sponsorship for a 2014 CWA event on Capitol Hill under pressure from gay rights groups, for example, the group issued an action alert accusing the senator of squelching free speech to appease “the pro-homosexual, bisexual, and transgender lobby.")[8] CWA has also sent delegations to AIPAC’s annual policy conferences.[9]

CWA has attracted criticism for publishing anti-Islamic materials. According to Think Progress’ Matt Duss, CWA publications have characterized Islam as “a military strategy and a political and socio-economic system” rather than a religion. Duss noted that in several jurisdictions, CWA has lent its organizational weight to support anti-sharia legislation developed by anti-Islamic activist David Yerushalmi.[10] “CWA has eagerly read straight from the Islamophobia playbook, relying on the work of Andrew McCarthy, Frank Gaffney, Nonie Darwish, Robert Spencer, and others,” added The Daily Beast’s Sarah Posner. “But its focus on a biblical mandate leads it to even more alarming levels of Islamophobia, portraying Islam as being in a cosmic conflict with Christianity.” Posner noted that a CWA action alert had urged President Obama to be “pro-Israel” rather than “pro-Islam,” and that an article on CWA’s website had falsely alleged that Obama “avoids traditional Biblical holidays and events, but regularly recognizes major Muslim holidays.”[11]

Although CWA does not reveal its funding sources, it claims over half a million members and states that any monetary contribution automatically establishes membership.[12] The group’s 2012 Form 990 filing reported over $6 million in contributions for CWA proper,[13] while a separate 2012 filing reported over $8 million in contributions for CWA’s lobbying arm.[14]

 

Share RightWeb

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Sources

[1] Concerned Women for America, “About Us,” http://www.cwfa.org/about/.

[2] Concerned Women for America, “Our History,” http://www.cwfa.org/about/our-history/.

[3] Peter Montgomery, “Religious Right Leaders Defend Russia's Anti-Gay Law,” Right Wing Watch, November 15, 2013, http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/religious-right-leaders-defend-russia-s-anti-gay-law.

[4] Bryan Tashman, “CWA: How Dare Obama Criticize Uganda's Anti-Gay Law,” February 27, 2014, http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/cwa-how-dare-obama-criticize-ugandas-anti-gay-law.

[5] Concerned Women for America, “Our Issues,” http://www.cwfa.org/about/issues/

[6] Jennifer Rubin, “A strong new player in the pro-Israel community,” Washington Post “Right Turn” blog, June 5, 2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/06/05/a-strong-new-player-in-the-pro-israel-community/.

[7] Penny Young Nance, CWA Legislative Action Committee letter on Nuclear Weapon-Free Iran Act, January 2014, http://www.cwfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CWALAC_Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Iran-Act.pdf.

[8] Concerned Women for America, “Senator Kirk Needs to Hear from You Today,” November 19, 2013, http://www.cwfa.org/take-actionsenator-kirk-needs-to-hear-from-you-today/

[9] Concerned Women for America, “Mr. President, Israel Matters,” March 25, 2013, http://www.cwfa.org/mr-president-israel-matters/

[10] Matt Duss, “Women’s Group Adopting Pro-Israel Agenda Has A History Of Anti-Islam Activism,” Think Progress, June 10, 2013, http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/06/10/2125361/cwfa-israel-anti-islam/

[11] Sarah Posner, “WaPo Blogger Welcomes Evangelical Islamophobes to the Pro-Israel Tent,” The Daily Beast, June 10, 2013, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/10/wapo-blogger-welcomes-evangelical-islamophobes-to-the-pro-israel-tent.html.

[12] Concerned Women for America, “Give Now,” http://www.cwfa.org/take-action/give-now/.

[13] Guidestar.org, 2012 Form 990 for Concerned Women for America, http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/953/580/2013-953580834-09beb2bf-9.pdf.

[14] Guidestar.org, 2012 Form 990 for Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee, http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/953/370/2013-953370744-09c5caea-9O.pdf

Share RightWeb

Concerned Women for America Résumé

Contact Information

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
http://www.cwfa.org/


Founded

1979


Mission Statement

“The mission of the CWA is to protect and promote Biblical values among all citizens—first through prayer, then education, and finally by influencing our society—thereby reversing the decline in moral values in our nation.”


Board of Trustees (as of 2012)

  • Beverly LaHaye, Founder and Chairman
  • Penny Nance, CEO/President
  • Tanya Ditty
  • Susi Barlow
  • Anne Ball
  • Sharron LaHaye
  • Barrie Lyons
  • Janne Myrdal
  • Lori Scheck
  • Norma Seifert
  • Angel Voggenreiter
  • Lee LaHaye
  • Cherie Short
  • Geoff Putnam


Staff (as of 2014)

  • Penny Nance, CEO/President
  • Janice Shaw Crouse, Executive Director & Senior Fellow
  • Kenda Barlett, Executive Director
  • Mario Diaz, Counsel
  • Shari Rendall, Director of House Legislation
  • Alison Howard, Communications Director
  • Alexandria Paolozzi, Senate Legislative Director
  • Caroline Biggs, Young Women for America Coordinator

Related:

Concerned Women for America News Feed

How Prominent Women Built and Sustained the Religious Right - Religion & PoliticsContent Ratings Are Hot Topic at FCC - Broadcasting & CableConservatives want Cuccinelli for DHS, will 'make America great again' - Washington ExaminerBrazil to relocate embassy to Jerusalem despite 'pushback' - Washington ExaminerAbortion Matters Should Be Determined At National, Local Level, Not 'International Right' Under U.N. Documents, Opinion Piece Says - Kaiser Family FoundationNorth Dakota moves to nullify its 1975 Equal Rights support - WRAL.comHigh-Wire Act Ahead for Trump's New Women's Rights Envoy - Foreign PolicyProducer, author Curtis Bowers coming to Dodge City - Dodge City Daily GlobeChoose Life specialty license plates ready for production in Kansas - The Topeka Capital-JournalTrump Officials Attend Hungarian Conference to Promote Women Having More Babies - Rewire.NewsNRB Comments on 'Disconnect' over TV Parental Guidelines - NRB TodayAbortion bill heard in Senate committee - News - Mexico LedgerAlex Acosta backlash: Leader of Concerned Women for America calls for his resignation - Washington TimesConcerned Women for America support Kavanaugh as Supreme Court judge - Columbia MissourianPublic Sees America's Future in Decline on Many Fronts - Pew Research Center's Social and Demographic TrendsFetal Homicide Bill That Defines Personhood Advances In The House - Iowa Public RadioBender: Adventures in legislating - Grand Forks HeraldReligious Broadcasters Have TV Ratings Issues - Broadcasting & CableBill increasing birth control access sparks abortion debate - Columbia MissourianSponsor makes personal appeal for bill to ban 'conversion therapy' - Times Record

Right Web is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The new government will, once again, be the most right wing in Israel’s history. But this time, the length of the new government’s tenure will depend more on Netanyahu’s legal troubles than on the political dynamics of the coalition.


Given such a dismal U.S. record on non-proliferation, why should North Korea trust U.S. promises of future sanctions relief and security guarantees in exchange for denuclearization? If anything, the case of the JCPOA has demonstrated that regardless of its pledges the United States can reinstate sanctions and even bully private multinational companies to divest from Iran.


As Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Saudi crown prince and de facto ruler Mohammad bin Salman clamor for a war against Iran, they seem to have conveniently forgotten the destruction and mayhem wrought by the American invasion of Iraq 16 years ago.


President Trump’s announcement that he would recognise Israeli sovereignty over the western part of the Golan Heights destroys the negotiating basis for any future peace between Israel and Syria. It also lays the groundwork for a return to a world without territorial integrity for smaller, weaker countries.


The Senate on Wednesday passed a measure mandating the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Saudi/UAE-led war against Houthi rebels in Yemen. The vote marks the first time since the War Powers Act of 1973 became law that both chambers of Congress have directed the president to withdraw American forces from a conflict.


The Trump administration’s failed “maximum pressure” approach to Iran and North Korea begs the question what the US president’s true objectives are and what options he is left with should the policy ultimately fail.


In the United States, it’s possible to debate any and every policy, domestic and foreign, except for unquestioning support for Israel. That, apparently, is Ilhan Omar’s chief sin.


RightWeb
share