Institute for Policy Studies  –  www.ips-dc.orgPolitical Research Associates

Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Center for American Freedom


center-american-freedom

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

The right-wing advocacy group Center for American Freedom (CAF) and its online journal the Washington Free Beacon were founded in 2012 to serve as counterweights to the purported liberal domination of online media.[1]

CAF’s founding chairman is Michael Goldfarb, a lobbyist and activist associated with several neoconservative groups, including the Emergency Committee for Israel, the Liz Cheney-led Keep America Safe, and the now-defunct Project for the New American Century. The editor of the Washington Free Beaconis Matthew Continetti, a contributor to the neocon Weekly Standard. Aaron Harison, the former executive director of Keep America Safe, is the group’s president.[2]

Board members include the ubiquitous William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and a supporter of a passel of neoconservative pressure groups, as well as Weekly Standard contributors Jaime Sneider and Mary Katharine Ham, who is also conservative radio host and Fox News commentator.[iii]

CAF’s website describes the group’s purpose thusly: “The Center For American Freedom is a conservative not-for-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through education, ideas, and action. We are creating a long-term, conservative vision for America—a vision that policy makers, thought-leaders, and activists can use to shape the national debate and pass laws that make a difference. Our mission is to transform conservative ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other conservative leaders throughout the country and the world.”[4]

In an expose about the group for Politico, Ben Smith wrote that CAF was inspired by its liberal counterpart, the Center for American Progress (CAP) and its blog, ThinkProgress. Said Continetti, “Our models are the Center for American Progress/Think Progress, [Talking Points Memo], and Huffington Post politics. These outlets have been at the cutting edge of ideological journalism for years, and it is time for the right to emulate their success.” Added Goldfarb: “It’s very impressive what they’ve done. Obviously, I think they’re misguided and they have some horrible policy views and they’ve done some things I wouldn’t do, but the premise of it is extremely impressive.”[5]

Reflecting on what he apparently regards as the novelty of a conservative news site, Continetti described the Washington Free Beacon as an attempt to present “the other half of the story, the half that the elite media have taken such pains to ignore: the inside deals, cronyism cloaked in the public interest, and far-out nostrums of contemporary progressivism and the Democratic Party. At the Beacon, all friends of freedom will find an alternative to the hackneyed spin, routine misstatements, paranoid hyperbole, and insipid folderol of Democratic officials and the liberal gasbags on MSNBC and talk radio. At the Beacon, we follow only one commandment: Do unto them.” Continetti summed up the journal’s work as “combat journalism.”[6]

Early Beacon publications appeared to primarily be concerned with Democratic Party fundraising and related stories, but other entries by reporter Adam Kredo highlighted right-wing charges of anti-semitism leveled at groups like the Center for American Progress (or “the Center for American Prejudice”) and Media Matters for America,[7] as well as Iran’s hostility toward Israel.[8]

To compete with other online media outlets, CAF put together what one conservative blogger characterized as a “murderer’s row of talent.”[9] According to Ben Smith, Continetti “hired a staff on a scale that will make an immediate impact on the Washington media scene. They include Bill Gertz, a veteran Washington Times defense national security writer, and the Washington Jewish Week’s Adam Kredo, a well-sourced beat reporter with a reputation for neutrality. The Beacon has also poached Andrew Stiles from National Review online; CJ Ciaramella from The Daily Caller; Patrick Howley from the American Spectator; and Sonny Bunch, a former Weekly Standard and Washington Times writer now at the lobbying and corporate public relations firm Berman & Co.”[10]

Describing the group’s offices and support staff, Smith wrote: “The group’s new offices, at 1600 K St., have at their physical heart a campaign-style war room and wall of televisions, where Drew Florio, who ran Meg Whitman’s campaign war room when she ran for governor of California and did opposition research for Jon Huntsman’s presidential campaign, will lead a team of junior staffers. The research department, meanwhile, is led by Tim Killeen, a former acting RNC research director; former RNC research director Shawn Reinschmidt is a consultant to the group.”[11]

Although he declined to reveal the group’s donors, Goldfarb told Smith that CAF would have an annual budget of “several million dollars.” Reported Politico in early 2012: “The group is currently structured as a 501(c)(4) advocacy group, Goldfarb said, mimicking CAP’s more combative media and research arm, the Center for American Progress Action Fund; it may add a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) nonprofit, like CAP, for less overtly partisan work, he said. Goldfarb said he’s borrowing another position from the liberal think tank, which was founded in 2003 to buttress the Democratic opposition to a Republican president. Like CAP, his group won’t disclose its donors. CAP has justified that stance by saying that, unlike the anonymously financed campaign groups it criticizes for secrecy, it doesn’t run TV ads.”[12]

Please note: IPS Right Web neither represents nor endorses any of the individuals or groups profiled on this site.

Please click the following link to bookmark this page:


If the link doesn't appear don't worry, your browser doesn't support this function.

Try pressing 'ctrl + d' on a PC or 'cmd + d' if your using a Mac.

Close

    Contact Information

    Center for American Freedom
    1600 K Street, NW
    Suite 200
    Washington, DC 20006
    202.465.8605
    http://americanfreedom.com/

    Founded

    2012

    About

    “The Center For American Freedom is a conservative not-for-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through education, ideas, and action. We are creating a long-term, conservative vision for America—a vision that policy makers, thought-leaders, and activists can use to shape the national debate and pass laws that make a difference. Our mission is to transform conservative ideas into policy through rapid response communications, legislative action, organizing and advocacy, and partnerships with other conservative leaders throughout the country and the world.”

    Principals  (2012)

    • Michael Goldfarb, Chairman
    • Aaron Harison, President
    • Matthew Continetti, Editor
    • Jaime Sneider, Board member
    • Mary Katharine Ham, Board Member
    • William Kristol, Board Member
The Right Web Mission

Right Web tracks militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

Sources

[1] CAF, http://americanfreedom.com/; Washington Free Beacon, http://freebeacon.com/

[2] CAF, Staff, http://americanfreedom.com/staff/.

[3] CAF, Staff, http://americanfreedom.com/staff/.

[4] CAF, About, http://americanfreedom.com/about/.

[5] Ben Smith, “How to fight liberals: Imitate them,” Politico, January 5, 2012, http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=31ADA019-4DAA-4765-9C2F-C7F74FD02CB2.

[6] Daniel Halper, “Welcome, Washington Free Beacon,” Weekly Standard blog, Feburary 7, 2012, http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/welcome-washington-free-beacon_626259.html.

[7] Adam Kredo, “Center for American Prejudice: Leftist Anti-Semitic Propaganda Handicaps National Security,” Washington Free Beacon, February 8, 2012, http://freebeacon.com/center-for-american-prejudice/.

[8] Adam Kredo, “Iranian official lays out attack plan to destroy Israel in nine minutes,” Washington Free Beacon, February 8, 2012, http://freebeacon.com/iranian-official-lays-out-attack-plan-to-destroy-israel-in-9-minutes/.

[9] Matt Labash, Daily Caller, January 18, 2012, http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/18/ask-matt-labash-the-upside-of-eating-fingernails-welcoming-the-new-kids-and-picking-the-scab-off-iowa/.

[10] Ben Smith, “How to fight liberals: Imitate them,” Politico, January 5, 2012, http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=31ADA019-4DAA-4765-9C2F-C7F74FD02CB2.

[11] Ben Smith, “How to fight liberals: Imitate them,” Politico, January 5, 2012, http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=31ADA019-4DAA-4765-9C2F-C7F74FD02CB2.

[12] Ben Smith, “How to fight liberals: Imitate them,” Politico, January 5, 2012, http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=31ADA019-4DAA-4765-9C2F-C7F74FD02CB2.

Latest Feature Articles
Whither the Liberal Hawks?

Jim Lobe | January 31, 2012

Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with mounting threats from hawks in Israel and the United States, has brought the possibility of war sharply into view. But a number of influential members of the U.S. foreign policy establishment—including several prominent liberal interventionists who supported the invasion of Iraq—are warning against further escalation.

Rise of the Vulcans Redux

Peter Certo | December 19, 2011

The purported “end of the neocon consensus” has hardly meant an end to hawkishness in the GOP fold. With the Republican candidates virtually all gunning for Iran, backing right-wing Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, and stabling a passel of neoconservative advisers (Ron Paul excepted), voters have plenty of clues about what the foreign policy of a new GOP administration would look like. And while some of the candidates have expressed wariness with neoconservative notions of armed democracy promotion, all the signs indicate that if a Republican wins next year, we will likely be in for a bit if George W. redux.

Turning the Tide on the “Pro-Israel” Debate

Michael Flynn and Peter Certo | December 13, 2011

With key members of the "Israel Lobby" acknowledging the importance of providing a broader space to Israel’s critics, the indelibly beltway Politico recognizing the influence of such critics in a full-length feature, and core Democratic organizations showing an increasing sensitivity to inappropriate uses of the anti-Semite charge, is the United States finally willing to undertake a real debate on what are the best U.S. interests in the Middle East?

The China Divide and the Future of the GOP

Robert Farley | November 08, 2011

The issue of whither U.S. relations with China is an important test case for observing the divide between the free market and neoconservative wings of the Republican Party. Thus far, the GOP presidential candidates have largely failed to articulate a vision of China that comes anywhere close to reflecting the complexity of U.S.-Chinese relations. Among the leading candidates, Mitt Romney has arguably been the most aggressive in his discussion of China policy. Yet, his embrace of a hawkish line towards Beijing would appear to indicate that President Obama’s would-be challengers have not yet found an alternative vocabulary for talking and thinking about one of the critical foreign policy issues of the 2012 election. It seems clear that even though neoconservatives lack grassroots support, they offer what is effectively the only option for an “establishment” GOP candidate, a fact that could have lasting impact both on the viability of any Republican Party foreign policy platform as well as future U.S. decision-making vis-à-vis other hotspots like Iran, Israel, and North Korea.

Right Web | rightweb.irc-online.org


1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20036
USA
|
|
202-234-9382

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Right Web is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies; www.ips-dc.org