Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Legal Dragnet, Fallen Hawk, Faith-Based Government

Print Friendly

RightWeb Readers:

Thanksto those readers who replied to last issue’s request for paid subscriptions($25 a year) and those who became IRC members and sustainers. Right Web dependssolely on individuals donors. Without your support, we cannot sustain thisproject. We received $475 in subscriptions and donations from the appeal inlast issue. The annual budget for Right Web News is $22,500–which puts usabout $19, 750 short going into the third month of the year.

Pleaseconsider paying the annual $25 honor subscription to Right Web News andbecoming a member of the IRC.

Youcan do this by clickinghere: https://secure.iexposure.com/irc/donate.cfm.Or you can write that number on a check addressed to the IRC: http://www.irc-online.org/contact.phpOr go to the IRC donate page and use Pay Pal for your contribution.

Thank you.

Right Web Staff

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Right Web News | February 22, 2005

“Exposing the Architectureof Power That’s Changing Our World”

http://rightweb.irc-online.org

Editor: Tom Barry

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This Week on theRight

New Homeland Security Czar’s Legal Dragnet

[Excerpted from new Right Webanalysis, with complete version available at:

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/analysis/2005/0502chertoff.php]

Michael Chertoff,who served as the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division under Attorney General John Ashcroft, has replaced Tom Ridge as theadministration’s new chief of the homeland security department. Praised by thepresident as a “brilliant thinker” and for his “stellar career” as a toughprosecutor, Chertoff is now in charge of determining the color of the day’sterror alert and overseeing what the administration has described as the “homefront” in its war against terrorism. Human rights advocates, civillibertarians, and immigrant rights activists sharply criticized the appointmentof Chertoff for his abusive record as Ashcroft’s chief counterterrorismprosecutor.

Like othernew appointments, Chertoff has proved himself a Bush loyalist. Chertoff, whohelped write the US Patriot Act, has little to show in the way of actualachievements in directing criminal prosecutions against any of the manyhundreds of suspected terrorists detained by the Justice Department.Nonetheless, following the pattern set by the promotions of Alberto Gonzalesand Condoleezza Riceto attorney general and secretary of state, Chertoff has fallen upwards in thesecond Bush administration.

Chertoff,a rabbi’s son from northern New Jersey, is widelyrespected for his razor-sharp mind and fearsome courtroom demeanor. While at Harvard Law School, he was aclassmate of Scott Turow, whose semi-fictional memoir about law school, One L, was based inpart on his memories of Chertoff’s brutal yet incisive manner of legalargument.

Apolitical partisan, Chertoff became special counsel to the WhitewaterCommission established in 1994 by the Republican-majority Congress toinvestigate the involvement of Bill and Hilary Clinton in real estate deals in Arkansas and otherbusiness deals. Now widely regarded as a political witch hunt spearheaded bySen. Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY) and Independent Counselor Kenneth Starr, theWhitewater Commission spent $40 million on the investigation that ultimatelyfailed to find that the Clintons had doneanything illegal.

Chertoffis a longtime member and activist in the Federalist Society. This nationalassociation of right-wing lawyers and judicial reform activists is dedicated torealigning the country’s legal system to reflect a more conservative interpretationof the constitution. The Federalist Society, which since its founding in 1982has been closely linked to the neoconservative political camp, aims to rid thesystem of liberal judges and stamp out what it sees are its overly egalitarianand secular impulses. Association members believe that the constitution and thecountry’s laws should primarily serve to ensure order and social orthodoxyrather than democracy and human rights.

As U.S.Attorney General in New Jersey, appointed by President H.W. Bush in1990, Chertoff gained the reputation as a political attack dog for theRepublican Party. Leveraging his strong political base in New Jersey, Chertoff servedas financial vice-chair of Bush’s 2000 campaign in the Garden State.

Elliot Abrams–Fallen Hawk Soars Again

(Excerpted from an articlepublished by Inter Press Service, with complete version at: http://www.antiwar.com/orig/barry.php?articleid=4847)

Elliott Abrams, a figure fromthe Ronald Reagan-era Iran-Contra scandal who describes himself as a”neo-conservative and neo-Reaganite”, is moving to center-stage in U.S. foreignpolicy as head of President George W.. Bush’s Global Democracy Strategy.

In his new position, Abramswill oversee the administration’s promotion of democracy and human rights whilecontinuing to provide oversight to the National Security Council’s directorateof Near East and North African affairs — including involvementin the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.

Although not known as aregional specialist, Abrams has frequently voiced his strong support for Israel’sLikud party positions on the Oslo peace process and ”land for peace” negotiations.

In his private writing andnongovernmental policy advocacy work, Abrams has described radical separatistand segregationist leanings. He believes, for example, that Jews shouldn’t dateor attend school with non-Jews.

”Outside the land ofIsrael,” says Abrams, ”there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to thecovenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in whichthey live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart — except in Israel –from the rest of the population.”

Judaism, according toAbrams, demands ”apartness” — not in the sense of confining oneself to aphysical ghetto but in that all necessary measures should be taken to prevent”prolonged and intimate exposure to non-Jewish culture.”

Abrams takes care to notethat his positions imply no ”disloyalty” to the United States, but at the sametime he insists that Jews must be loyal to Israel because they ”are in apermanent covenant with God and with the land of Israel and its people. Theircommitment will not weaken if the Israeli government pursues unpopular policies.”

Abrams describes himself asa ”somewhat observant Conservative Jew” in his controversial book, ”Faith andFear: How Jews Can Survive in Christian America”.

Unlike Condoleezza Rice,Abrams is not commonly regarded as being a Bush or Republican Party loyalist.Rather over the past three decades he has established his credentials as aninfluential right-wing ideologue — one who has effectively put his own ideasabout religion, human rights, democracy, and U.S. power to work both as aleading figure the world of neoconservative policy institutes and as a skilledforeign policy operative.

Abrams is equallycomfortable in using military intervention, human rights advocacy,democratization programs, and back-door illegal channels as instruments to advancea neoconservative foreign policy agenda.

FeaturedProfiles

**Civil Liberties Be DamnedIn keeping with the pattern of other Bush appointments, Chertoff has proved hisloyalty to Bush—and to the Republican Party—as a storm trooper in the failed waron terrorism at home and abroad.

Right Web Profile:Michael Chertoff: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/chertoff/chertoff.php

**Neocons and LebaneseExiles Together Working closely with leading neoconservatives, the U.S.Committee for a Free Lebanon is at once pro-Israeli Likud and anti-SyrianBaathist.

Right Web Profile: U.S.Committee for a Free Lebanon: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/uscfl.php

**Washington’sMan in Latin America Roger Noriega’s steady climb through the ranks of U.S.diplomacy has been based not on his skills as a statesman or diplomat, but ratheron a willingness to do what’s necessary to defend U.S. eliteinterests abroad. In many instances, those actions have included shady dealingsof questionable legality and morality.

Right Web Profile: RogerNoriega: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/noriega/noriega.php

FeaturedAnalysis

Bush Administration’s “Faith-Based” Initiatives—

Transforming America “One Soul at a Time”

By Don Monkerud

In his State of the Unionaddress, President Bush called for the passage of his two faith-basedinitiatives to transform America “one soul at a time.” The initiatives the presidentspoke of would allow religious organizations to compete for more governmentcontracts and grants that destroy the strict separation between religiousactivities and social service programs.

In the past four years,President Bush has gone around Congress and behind the public’s back to spreadhis faith-based initiative throughout the government, raising serious issuesthat the public appears to accept.

Don Monkerud is an Aptos,California-based writer who follows religion and politics, and contributes tothe Right Web program of the International Relations Center, online at http://www.irc-online.org.

Right Web Analysis: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/analysis/2005/0502religion.php

Lettersand Comments

(Editors Note: Weencourage feedback and comments, which can be sent for publication through ourfeedback page, at: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/form_feedback.html.Thank you.)

Re: Neocons and Liberals,Again, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/analysis/2005/0502ally.php

The spirit of Scoop Jacksonis alive and well. Cold war liberals have signed on to a new charter that willhelp to finish off what remains of a progressive domestic agenda and ensure afuture of never-ending struggle and sacrifice like that which we eldersremember and regret. Kiss goodbye to any belief that we can use ourunprecedented wealth to build a more decent society and viable world order.

– Sumner M. Rosen, WWIIpurple heart veteran

Re: Bush Administration’s “Faith-Based”Initiatives—Transforming America “One Soul at a Time”

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/analysis/2005/0502religion.php

Let us take a look at’”faith-based’” charity, from its origin. When Christianity was created tomanage the slaves of the Roman Empire, a scam was devised that would cement the slaves tothe church. The church was designed to operate on 10% of the profits derivedfrom slavery. The aristocrats allowed the slaves less than the minimumfor survival and the church says to them “come hither and god will giveyou the charity that will allow you to survive.” The starving slavescame, and the church doled out to them the pittance that allowed them tosurvive, and thus the slaves owed their very lives to the church. Whendemocracy emerged the American revolution, the democratic government took uponitself to fill this function of guaranteeing survival of the downtrodden,taking this scam away from the church and marginalizing its function in thedemocratic economy. Thus, the theocrats have hated government ‘benefits’ever since, and the basis for their panic to destroy all government benefitsprograms, like Social Security, welfare, minimum wage, and all of the thingsthat make our democracy a success and keep slavery from being recreated by thetheocrats.

– Charles W. Smith<cwssystems@wfeca.net>

Re: Right Web ProfileMichael A. Ledeen: http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/ledeen/ledeen.php

While I disagreefundamentally with many of the opinions expressed in your article about Dr.Ledeen, it is the astonishing lack of factual details which surprises me.Harold Rhode earned his PhD in the 1980s, and is therefore entitled to thetitle Dr., not Mr.

— MD<litedrum2001@yahoo.com>

Re: Thomas Donnelly, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/donnelly/donnelly.php

A sentence in ThomasDonnelly (AEI Scholar and PNAC associate) comments on President’s Bush’ visitto Europe puzzles me. When comparing the EU and the U.S. hesaid. ‘The U.S. is not a ‘status-quo’ nation but a ‘revolutionarypower’.”

What exactly is a“revolutionary power”?

– Simon Kalf<simon.kalf@planet.nl>

Re: Vast Right WingConspiracy

As a life member of the VastRight Wing Conspiracy, someone who has GOP tattooed across his heart, a man whowould vote Ann Coulter into any political office (basically, a gun-totin’,First Amendment slingin’, flag wavin’, prayer-in-school murmurer, MiltonFriedman-lovin’, right-to-lifer) my views are likely not to be too terribly inline with yours. Mine are based on an enduring and absolute love for God,country, and the freedoms I hold dear.

Would you kindly remove mye-mail address from your mailing list? Feel free to give my subscription to aFrenchman, someone whose opinions of this great country and its leaders aremore in line with your organization and this country’s media.

– David Scott<dscott@elca.org>

If you would like to see our variety of free ezines and listservs, please go to: http://www.irc-online.org/lists/.
To be removed from this list, please email rightweb@irc-online.org with “unsubscribe Right Web.”

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Although sometimes characterized as a Republican “maverick” for his bipartisan forays into domestic policy, Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is one of the Senate’s more vocal hawks.


Former CIA director Michael Hayden, a stalwart advocate of the Bush-era policies on torture and warrantless wiretapping, has been a vocal critic of Donald Trump


The former GOP presidential candidate and Speaker of the House has been a vociferous proponent of the idea that the America faces an existential threat from “Islamofascists.”


David Albright is the founder of the Institute for Science and International Security, a non-proliferation think tank whose influential analyses of nuclear proliferation issues in the Middle East have been the source of intense disagreement and debate.


A right-wing Christian and governor of Kansas, Brownback previously served in the U.S. Senate, where he gained a reputation as a leading social conservative as well as an outspoken “pro-Israel” hawk on U.S. Middle East policy.


Steve Forbes, head of the Forbes magazine empire, is an active supporter of a number of militarist policy organizations that have pushed for aggressive U.S. foreign policies.


Stephen Hadley, an Iraq War hawk and former national security adviser to President George W. Bush, now chairs the U.S. Institute for Peace.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

The Trump administration appears to have been surprised by this breach among its friends in the critical Gulf strategic area. But it is difficult to envision an effective U.S. role in rebuilding this Humpty-Dumpty.


Print Friendly

A recent vote in the European Parliament shows how President Trump’s relentless hostility to Iran is likely to isolate Washington more than Tehran.


Print Friendly

The head of the Institute for Science and International Security—aka “the Good ISIS”—recently demonstrated again his penchant for using sloppy analysis as a basis for politically explosive charges about Iran, in this case using a faulty translation from Persian to misleadingly question whether Tehran is “mass producing advanced gas centrifuges.”


Print Friendly

Trump has exhibited a general preference for authoritarians over democrats, and that preference already has had impact on his foreign policy. Such an inclination has no more to do with realism than does a general preference for democrats over authoritarians.


Print Friendly

The President went to the region as a deal maker and a salesman for American weapon manufacturing. He talked about Islam, terrorism, Iran, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without the benefit of expert advice in any of these areas. After great showmanship in Riyadh, Jerusalem, and Bethlehem, he and his family left the region without much to show for or to benefit the people of that war-torn region.


Print Friendly

Although the Comey memo scandal may well turn out to be what brings Trump down, this breach of trust may have had more lasting effect than any of Trump’s other numerous misadventures. It was an unprecedented betrayal of Israel’s confidence. Ironically, Trump has now done what even Barack Obama’s biggest detractors never accused him of: seriously compromised Israel’s security relationship with the United States.


Print Friendly

Congress and the public acquiesce in another military intervention or a sharp escalation of one of the U.S. wars already under way, perhaps it’s time to finally consider the true costs of war, American-style — in lives lost, dollars spent, and opportunities squandered. It’s a reasonable bet that never in history has a society spent more on war and gotten less bang for its copious bucks.


RightWeb
share