Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Huckabee’s Holocaust Remark Defended by Adelson-Funded ZOA

LobeLog

Former Arkansas governor and GOP hopeful Mike Huckabee’s comparison between the Iran deal and the Holocaust brought an avalanche of denunciations from Jewish groups condemning his prediction that President Barack Obama will “take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven.”

The Anti-Defamation League, the National Jewish Democratic Council, and the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) all issued statements criticizing, to varying degrees, his comparison of the Holocaust to the Obama administration’s efforts to constrain Iran’s nuclear program. Even Ron Dermer, Israel’s ambassador to Washington and no close friend of the Obama administration, said Huckabee’s comments were inappropriate. But Huckabee found at least one ally in the Jewish community: the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).

The ZOA, which rarely makes headlines and sits well to the right of mainstream Jewish groups, has received a good deal of its funding over the past decade from Miriam and Sheldon Adelson. Adelson is also likely the biggest individual donor to the Republican Party. He is expected to contribute over $100 million toward electing a Republican to the White House in 2016.

Miriam Adelson is listed as the ZOA’s single largest donor, contributing $1,513,870, between 2007 and 2011, according to a “Schedule A” IRS form acquired by LobeLog (viewable here). And the Adelson’s largesse to the ZOA didn’t end in 2011. In 2013, the Adelson’s family foundation contributed $2 million to the ZOA, approximately 40 percent of the ZOA’s 2013 grant revenue.

Last year, ZOA president Morton Klein, emerged as Sheldon Adelson’s de facto spokesman after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie offended Adelson and Klein by referring to the West Bank as the “occupied territories.” This was a dangerous rhetorical misstep to commit in front of Adelson, an ardent supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

New York Magazine reported on the gaffe, leaning heavily on quotes from Klein.

Sheldon was concerned about the ‘occupied territory’ remark and he expected Christie would make amends and would express support for Israel and it didn’t happen,” said Adelson ally and head of Zionist Organization of America Morton Klein, who said he spoke with Adelson after the event, an awards ceremony organized to honor champions of Jewish values by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. Klein said he spoke to all the largest donors at the event, which included not only Adelson but fellow billionaire Michael Steinhardt, who funds “birthright Israel” a program that pays for any Jew under age 28 to visit Israel.

Sheldon, like others, “was perplexed and shocked and mystified,” said Klein. Adding his own thoughts, he asked, “Why did Christie do this? This was an insult.”

And if there’s any doubt that Klein, Huckabee, and the Adelsons share a mutual affinity, Sheldon and Miriam Adelson presented Huckabee with the ZOA’s “Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Award for the Defense of Israel” in November 2013. Sheldon Adelson praised Huckabee’s support of Israel “building homes in the territories as rapidly as you can and as much as you can until there’s a real agreement,” and his rejection of “carving [a Palestinian state] out of tiny Israel.”

ZOA, for its part, awarded Sheldon Adelson the “Theodor Herzl Gold Medallion for outstanding achievement in Zionism” in 2009.

Huckabee’s comments comparing the P5+1’s nuclear agreement with Iran to the Holocaust may be out of line with the American Jewish establishment. But there’s every indication that the Republican Party’s biggest donor is aligned with Huckabee’s views when it comes to Israel, Palestinians, and the dangers of a diplomatic resolution to tensions over Iran’s nuclear program.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Zalmay Khalilzad is Donald Trump’s special representative to the Afghan peace process, having previously served as ambassador to Afghanistan and Iraq under George W. Bush.


Robert Joseph played a key role in manipulating U.S. intelligence to support the invasion of Iraq and today is a lobbyist for the MEK.


Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is one of the Senate’s more vocal hawks, and one of the prime vacillators among Republicans between objecting to and supporting Donald Trump.


Elliott Abrams, the Trump administration’s special envoy to Venezuela, is a neoconservative with a long record of hawkish positions and actions, including lying to Congress about the Iran-Contra affair.


Mike Pompeo, Donald Trump second secretary of state, has driven a hawkish foreign policy in Iran and Latin America.


Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is known for his hawkish views on foreign policy and close ties to prominent neoconservatives.


Nikki Haley, Donald Trump’s first U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, is known for her lock-step support for Israel and is widely considered to be a future presidential candidate.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

François Nicoullaud, the former French ambassador to Iran, discusses the ups and downs of Iran-France relations and the new US sanctions.


Effective alliances require that powerful states shoulder a far larger share of the alliance maintenance costs than other states, a premise that Donald Trump rejects.


The new imbroglio over the INF treaty does not mean a revival of the old Cold War practice of nuclear deterrence. However, it does reveal the inability of the West and Russia to find a way to deal with the latter’s inevitable return to the ranks of major powers, a need that was obvious even at the time the USSR collapsed.


As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump appeared to recognize the obvious problem of the revolving door. But as the appointment of Patrick Shanahan, who spent 30 years at Boeing, as the Trump administration’s acting secretary of defense reveals, little has changed. America is indeed great again, if you happen to be one of those lucky enough to be moving back and forth between plum jobs in the Pentagon and the weapons industry.


Domestic troubles, declining popularity, and a decidedly hawkish anti-Iran foreign policy team may combine to make the perfect storm that pushes Donald Trump to pull the United States into a new war in the Middle East.


The same calculus that brought Iran and world powers to make a deal and has led remaining JCPOA signatories to preserve it without the U.S. still holds: the alternatives to this agreement – a race between sanctions and centrifuges that could culminate in Iran obtaining the bomb or being bombed – would be much worse.


With Bolton and Pompeo by his side and Mattis departed, Trump may well go with his gut and attack Iran militarily. He’ll be encouraged in this delusion by Israel and Saudi Arabia. He’ll of course be looking for some way to distract the media and the American public. And he won’t care about the consequences.


RightWeb
share