Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Huckabee’s Holocaust Remark Defended by Adelson-Funded ZOA

GOP presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee’s recent remarks comparing the Iran nuclear deal to the Holocaust have been widely denounced by American Jewish organizations but have won praise from the Sheldon Adelson-funded Zionist Organization of America.

Print Friendly


Former Arkansas governor and GOP hopeful Mike Huckabee’s comparison between the Iran deal and the Holocaust brought an avalanche of denunciations from Jewish groups condemning his prediction that President Barack Obama will “take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven.”

The Anti-Defamation League, the National Jewish Democratic Council, and the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) all issued statements criticizing, to varying degrees, his comparison of the Holocaust to the Obama administration’s efforts to constrain Iran’s nuclear program. Even Ron Dermer, Israel’s ambassador to Washington and no close friend of the Obama administration, said Huckabee’s comments were inappropriate. But Huckabee found at least one ally in the Jewish community: the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).

The ZOA, which rarely makes headlines and sits well to the right of mainstream Jewish groups, has received a good deal of its funding over the past decade from Miriam and Sheldon Adelson. Adelson is also likely the biggest individual donor to the Republican Party. He is expected to contribute over $100 million toward electing a Republican to the White House in 2016.

Miriam Adelson is listed as the ZOA’s single largest donor, contributing $1,513,870, between 2007 and 2011, according to a “Schedule A” IRS form acquired by LobeLog (viewable here). And the Adelson’s largesse to the ZOA didn’t end in 2011. In 2013, the Adelson’s family foundation contributed $2 million to the ZOA, approximately 40 percent of the ZOA’s 2013 grant revenue.

Last year, ZOA president Morton Klein, emerged as Sheldon Adelson’s de facto spokesman after New Jersey Governor Chris Christie offended Adelson and Klein by referring to the West Bank as the “occupied territories.” This was a dangerous rhetorical misstep to commit in front of Adelson, an ardent supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

New York Magazine reported on the gaffe, leaning heavily on quotes from Klein.

Sheldon was concerned about the ‘occupied territory’ remark and he expected Christie would make amends and would express support for Israel and it didn’t happen,” said Adelson ally and head of Zionist Organization of America Morton Klein, who said he spoke with Adelson after the event, an awards ceremony organized to honor champions of Jewish values by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. Klein said he spoke to all the largest donors at the event, which included not only Adelson but fellow billionaire Michael Steinhardt, who funds “birthright Israel” a program that pays for any Jew under age 28 to visit Israel.

Sheldon, like others, “was perplexed and shocked and mystified,” said Klein. Adding his own thoughts, he asked, “Why did Christie do this? This was an insult.”

And if there’s any doubt that Klein, Huckabee, and the Adelsons share a mutual affinity, Sheldon and Miriam Adelson presented Huckabee with the ZOA’s “Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Award for the Defense of Israel” in November 2013. Sheldon Adelson praised Huckabee’s support of Israel “building homes in the territories as rapidly as you can and as much as you can until there’s a real agreement,” and his rejection of “carving [a Palestinian state] out of tiny Israel.”

ZOA, for its part, awarded Sheldon Adelson the “Theodor Herzl Gold Medallion for outstanding achievement in Zionism” in 2009.

Huckabee’s comments comparing the P5+1’s nuclear agreement with Iran to the Holocaust may be out of line with the American Jewish establishment. But there’s every indication that the Republican Party’s biggest donor is aligned with Huckabee’s views when it comes to Israel, Palestinians, and the dangers of a diplomatic resolution to tensions over Iran’s nuclear program.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

John Bolton, the controversial former U.S. ambassador to the UN and dyed-in the-wool foreign policy hawk, has been selected by President Trump to replace National Security Adviser McMaster, marking a sharp move to the hawkish extreme by the administration.

The Institute for the Study of War is a D.C.-based counterinsurgency think tank that has supported long-term U.S. military intervention in the Greater Middle East, especially Iraq and Afghanistan.

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) has been an outspoken proponent of militarist U.S. foreign polices and the use of torture, aping the views of her father, Dick Cheney.

United against Nuclear Iran is a pressure group that attacks companies doing business in Iran and disseminates alarmist reports about the country’s nuclear program.

Gina Haspel is a CIA officer who was nominated to head the agency by President Donald Trump in March 2018. She first came to prominence because of accusations that she oversaw the torture of prisoners and later destroyed video evidence of that torture.

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS), President Trump’s nominee for secretary of state to replace Rex Tillerson, is a “tea party” Republican who previously served as director of the CIA.

Richard Goldberg is a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who served as a foreign policy aide to former Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL).

For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Print Friendly

New NSA John Bolton represents an existential threat to the Iran nuclear deal and any hopes for peace in the region.

Print Friendly

Hardliners at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies are working overtime to convince the Trump administration to “fix” the nuclear agreement with Iran on the pretext that it will give the US leverage in negotiations with North Korea.

Print Friendly

North Korea and Iran both understand the lesson of Libya: Muammar Qaddafi, a horrifyingly brutal dictator, gave up his nuclear weapons, was eventually ousted from power with large-scale US assistance, and was killed. However, while Iran has a long and bitter history with the United States, North Korea’s outlook is shaped by its near-total destruction by forces led by the United States in the Korean War.

Print Friendly

Europe loathes having to choose between Tehran and Washington, and thus it will spare no efforts to avoid the choice. It might therefore opt for a middle road, trying to please both parties by persuading Trump to retain the accord and Iran to limit missile ballistic programs and regional activities.

Print Friendly

Key members of Trump’s cabinet should recognize the realism behind encouraging a Saudi- and Iranian-backed regional security agreement because the success of such an agreement would not only serve long-term U.S. interests, it could also have a positive impact on numerous conflicts in the Middle East.

Print Friendly

Given that Israel failed to defeat Hezbollah in its war in Lebanon in 2006, it’s difficult to imagine Israel succeeding in a war against both Hezbollah and its newfound regional network of Shiite allies. And at the same time not only is Hezbollah’s missile arsenal a lot larger and more dangerous than it was in 2006, but it has also gained vast experience alongside its allies in offensive operations against IS and similar groups.

Print Friendly

Donald Trump should never be excused of responsibility for tearing down the respect for truth, but a foundation for his flagrant falsifying is the fact that many people would rather be entertained, no matter how false is the source of their entertainment, than to confront truth that is boring or unsatisfying or that requires effort to understand.