Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Christie Pivots to Islamophobia and toward Adelson

GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie has sought to latch onto anti-Muslim sentiment in an apparent effort to win the support of mega-donor Sheldon Adelson.

LobeLog

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s pursuit of the Republican presidential nomination hasn’t been a success. He’s currently polling in eighth place with the support of between two and three percent of Republican primary voters. But, as The New York Times reported today, Christie is still trimming his sails to appeal to the modern GOP, even going so far as to embrace Islamophobia as a campaign tool. Although the Times credits Christie’s shift to an effort to appeal to primary voters, the promotion of an anti-Muslim agenda both at home and abroad has coincided with Christie’s year-and-a-half long struggle to secure the support of casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson.

Christie had previously maintained good ties to his Muslim constituents. He held annual Iftar dinners until 2012, rejected the GOP’s hostility to the Islamic community center in Lower Manhattan, and slammed critics as “the crazies” when they attacked a Muslim lawyer he had nominated for a judgeship.

Indeed, Christie was one of the rare but notable examples of a GOP politician who rejected the emerging Islamophobic party line. But all that has evaporated.

Last year, Christie rushed to apologize to Adelson after he referred to the West Bank as the “occupied territories,” the term used by the U.S. government, during a speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition(RJC). But Adelson, who sits on the board of the RJC and is expected to once again emerge as the single largest donor to the Republican presidential nominee, took offense. Christie personally apologized in a private meeting in the casino mogul’s office.

More recently, Christie has called for a full stop to the settling of Syrian refugees in the U.S., including the settlement of “orphans under five.” He has also been unwilling to confront Donald Trump about his inaccurate claims that Muslims celebrated the 9/11 attacks in New Jersey. This tilt toward outright bigotry toward Muslims brings Christie far closer to the Islamophobia promoted by the GOP’s biggest megadonor.

Adelson is the biggest donor of the Zionist Organization of America, a group which has taken a hardline stance against Syrian refugees. Last week, ZOA president Morton Kleinspeaking at an awards banquet attended by Adelson and his wife Miriam, urged the deportation of families of terrorists and called for no Syrian refugees to be admitted to the U.S.

“Don’t bring these refugees here. Treat as pariahs all those who promote radical Islam. … We must crush radical Islam as we crushed Nazism,” Klein said.

Adelson’s hawkish foreign policy views, especially in the Muslim world, are by now the party doctrine of the GOP. Indeed, as Ali Gharib recently pointed out, Adelson is at the nexus of the GOP’s Islamophobia. He reportedly helped distribute copies of the Islamophobic film Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West before the 2008 election, and he funds fringe anti-Muslim figures like Steven Emerson, who claimed that Islam, “which has more than 1.4 billion adherents, somehow sanctions genocide, planned genocide, as part of its religious doctrine.”

Adelson himself famously proposed firing an “atomic weapon” at Iran instead of negotiating with Tehran and funded a number of the groups opposing the Iran nuclear deal, including United Against Nuclear Iran and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Christie is increasingly a longshot in both the GOP presidential primary race and the contest for Adelson’s endorsement (and the millions which are expected to come with it). But with Adelson and his wife reportedly split between endorsing Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) , and the RJC’s presidential candidates forum scheduled for tomorrow, Christie may feel he can’t afford to come off as remotely sympathetic to Muslims either at home or abroad.

And with Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands Corporation having contributed over $3.5 million to the Republican Governors Association during Christie’s chairmanship of the group and the Las Vegas billionaire’s history of giving Christie access to one of his private jets, Christie has no shortage of reasons to maintain warm ties with the Adelsons. It’s no surprise, then, that he has embraced hardline policies towards Muslims, even at the expense of abandoning his Muslim constituents in New Jersey.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is one of the Senate’s more vocal hawks, and one of the prime vacillators among Republicans between objecting to and supporting Donald Trump.


Ron Dermer is the Israeli ambassador to the United States and has deep connections to the Republican Party and the neoconservative movement.


The Washington-based American Enterprise Institute is a rightist think tank with a broad mandate covering a range of foreign and domestic policy issues that is known for its strong connections to neoconservatism and overseas debacles like the Iraq War.


Max Boot, neoconservative military historian at the Council on Foreign Relations, on Trump and Russia: “At every turn Trump is undercutting the ‘get tough on Russia’ message because he just can’t help himself, he just loves Putin too much.”


Since taking office Donald Trump has revealed an erratic and extremely hawkish approach to U.S. foreign affairs, which has been marked by controversial actions like dropping out of the Iran nuclear agreement that have raised tensions across much of the world and threatened relations with key allies.


Mike Huckabee, a former governor of Arkansas and an evangelical pastor, is a far-right pundit known for his hawkish policies and opposition to an Israeli peace deal with the Palestinians.


Nikki Haley, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, is known for her lock-step support for Israel and considered by some to be a future presidential candidate.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

The Trumpian new regional order in the Middle East is predicated on strongman rule, disregard for human rights, Sunni primacy over Iran and other Shia centers of power, continued military support for pro-American warring parties regardless of the unlawfulness of such wars, and Israeli hegemony.


A comparison of U.S. nuclear diplomacy with Iran and the current version with North Korea puts the former in a good light and makes the latter look disappointing. Those with an interest in curbing the dangers of proliferating nuclear weapons should hope that the North Korea picture will improve with time. But whether it does or not, the process has put into perspective how badly mistaken was the Trump administration’s trashing of the Iran nuclear agreement.


Numerous high profile Trump administration officials maintain close ties with anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists. In today’s America, disparaging Islam is acceptable in ways that disparaging other religions is not. Given the continuing well-funded campaigns by the Islamophobes and continuing support from their enablers in the Trump administration, starting with the president himself, it seems unlikely that this trend will be reversed any time soon.


The Trump administration’s nuclear proliferation policy is now in meltdown, one which no threat of “steely resolve”—in Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s words—will easily contain. It is hemorrhaging in part because the administration has yet to forge a strategy that consistently and credibly signals a feasible bottom line that includes living with—rather than destroying—regimes it despises or fears. Political leaders on both sides of the aisle must call for a new model that has some reasonable hope of restraining America’s foes and bringing security to its Middle East allies.


Congressional midterm elections are just months away and another presidential election already looms. Who will be the political leader with the courage and presence of mind to declare: “Enough! Stop this madness!” Man or woman, straight or gay, black, brown, or white, that person will deserve the nation’s gratitude and the support of the electorate. Until that occurs, however, the American penchant for war will stretch on toward infinity.


To bolster the president’s arguments for cutting back immigration, the administration recently released a fear-mongering report about future terrorist threats. Among the potential threats: a Sudanese national who, in 2016, “pleaded guilty to attempting to provide material support to ISIS”; an Uzbek who “posted a threat on an Uzbek-language website to kill President Obama in an act of martyrdom on behalf of ISIS”; a Syrian who, in a plea agreement, “admitted that he knew a member of ISIS and that while in Syria he participated in a battle against the Syrian regime, including shooting at others, in coordination with Al Nusrah,” an al-Qaeda offshoot.


The recent appointment of purveyors of anti-Muslim rhetoric to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom exposes the cynical approach Republicans have taken in promoting religious freedom.


RightWeb
share