Right Web

Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy

Amitai Etzioni and War with Iran; the Emergency Committee for Israel; and more

Right Web is now on Facebook. Become a fan!

FEATURED ARTICLE

Muscular Nonrationality: Amitai Etzioni and War with Iran

By Marsha B. Cohen

Once described as the “Everything Expert” by Time magazine, Amitai Etzioni, the renowned social scientist and public intellectual based at George Washington University, has in recent years turned his attention to U.S. foreign affairs, offering at times contradictory views on how to handle perceived threats from North Korean, Russia, and elsewhere. Etzioni’s latest concern is Iran, which he claims will be impervious to nuclear deterrence, and thus must be bombed. Mixing his controversial views on “nonrational” state behavior, Israeli security, and “muscular morality,” Etzioni’s discourse has found favor among Israel’s right-wing. But does it make any sense? Read full article.

SPECIAL PROFILE SECTION: The Emergency Committee for Israel

Launched in July 2010 by a familiar passel of neoconservatives and militarist “pro-Israel” activists, the Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI) has the potential to push the state of the debate over U.S.-Israel relations far to the right. It’s opening salvo: a TV ad accusing Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) of supporting terrorists. Here’s a closer look at the ECI team:

Emergency Committee for Israel
The latest neocon pressure group aimed at pushing the Likud Party line in U.S. Middle East policy, ECI claims to “provide citizens with the facts they need to be sure that their public officials are supporting a strong US-Israel relationship.”

Rachel Abrams
Rachel Abrams, the scion of a tight-knit neoconservative clan and outspoken supporter of militarist “pro-Israel” policies, recently drew attention when she became a director of the new inside-the-beltway advocacy group called the Emergency Committee for Israel.

Gary Bauer
The Christian Zionist leader and former presidential candidate has been busy founding militarist pressure groups that attack President Obama and other Democrats for allegedly being soft on terrorism and not sufficiently supportive of Israel.

William Kristol
Perhaps inspired by his success using pressure groups to help push the country to war in Iraq, Kristol has been involved in the establishment of a passel of new neocon groups in the past year, including Keep America Safe, the Emergency Committee for Israel, and the Foreign Policy Initiative.

Noah Pollak
Apparently a rising star in the neocon firmament, Pollak serves as ECI’s executive director and has written for Commentary magazine and reportedly served as an adviser to the Israeli Defense Forces.

Michael Goldfarb
The former Weekly Standard editor recently added to his lengthy resume of support for militarist “pro-Israel” groups when he became “advisor” to the Emergency Committee for Israel.

ALSO NEW ON RIGHT WEB

Israel’s Next War Could Be Lebanon: Analyst
One high-profile U.S. observer thinks Israel might initiate hostilities with Hezbollah as a possible catalyst to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.

“Spy” Told CIA Iran Has No Nuclear Bomb Program
Iranian scientist Shahram Amiri, who recently “redefected” to Iran after claiming to have been abducted by the United States, allegedly told the CIA that Tehran does not have an active nuclear weapons program.

At War with Iran by Early 2011?
A typical clutch of war hawks appears to be preparing the ground for a major new campaign to rally public opinion behind military action against Iran.

CNN’s Mideast problem
CNN’s firing last week of its Mideast editor because of a Twitter post in which she expressed sadness over the death of a Lebanese cleric has set off a firestorm of debate about CNN’s fairness in reporting on the region.

Whither Netanyahu-Obama?
Last week’s diplomatic dance between Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Obama did little more than to give the Israeli government more time to avoid making the hard decisions needed to achieve peace with the Palestinians.

LETTERS

Right Web encourages feedback and comments. Send letters to rightweb.ips@gmail.com
 or call at 202-234-9382. We reserve the right to edit comments for clarity and brevity. Be sure to include your full name. Thank you.

Share RightWeb

Featured Profiles

Update was slow, but still no lag in the editor window, and footnotes are intact.     This has been updated – Bernard Lewis, who passed away in May 2018, was a renowned British-American historian of Islam and the Middle East. A former British intelligence officer, Foreign Office staffer, and Princeton University professor, Lewis was…


Bernard Lewis was a renowned historian of Islam and the Middle East who stirred controversy with his often chauvinistic attitude towards the Muslim world and his associations with high-profile neoconservatives and foreign policy hawks.


John Bolton, the controversial former U.S. ambassador to the UN and dyed-in the-wool foreign policy hawk, is President Trump’s National Security Adviser McMaster, reflecting a sharp move to the hawkish extreme by the administration.


Michael Joyce, who passed away in 2006, was once described by neoconservative guru Irving Kristol as the “godfather of modern philanthropy.”


Mike Pompeo, the Trump administration’s second secretary of state, is a long time foreign policy hawk and has led the public charge for an aggressive policy toward Iran.


Max Boot, neoconservative military historian at the Council on Foreign Relations, on Trump and Russia: “At every turn Trump is undercutting the ‘get tough on Russia’ message because he just can’t help himself, he just loves Putin too much.”


Michael Flynn is a former Trump administration National Security Advisor who was forced to step down only weeks on the job because of his controversial contacts with Russian officials before Trump took office.


For media inquiries,
email rightwebproject@gmail.com

From the Wires

Trump is not the problem. Think of him instead as a summons to address the real problem, which in a nation ostensibly of, by, and for the people is the collective responsibility of the people themselves. For Americans to shirk that responsibility further will almost surely pave the way for more Trumps — or someone worse — to come.


The United Nations has once again turn into a battleground between the United States and Iran, which are experiencing one of the darkest moments in their bilateral relations.


In many ways, Donald Trump’s bellicosity, his militarism, his hectoring cant about American exceptionalism and national greatness, his bullying of allies—all of it makes him not an opponent of neoconservatism but its apotheosis. Trump is a logical culmination of the Bush era as consolidated by Obama.


For the past few decades the vast majority of private security companies like Blackwater and DynCorp operating internationally have come from a relatively small number of countries: the United States, Great Britain and other European countries, and Russia. But that seeming monopoly is opening up to new players, like DeWe Group, China Security and Protection Group, and Huaxin Zhongan Group. What they all have in common is that they are from China.


The Trump administration’s massive sales of tanks, helicopters, and fighter aircraft are indeed a grim wonder of the modern world and never receive the attention they truly deserve. However, a potentially deadlier aspect of the U.S. weapons trade receives even less attention than the sale of big-ticket items: the export of firearms, ammunition, and related equipment.


Soon after a Saudi-led coalition strike on a bus killed 40 children on August 9, a CENTCOM spokesperson stated to Vox, “We may never know if the munition [used] was one that the U.S. sold to them.”


The West has dominated the post-war narrative with its doctrine of liberal values, arguing that not only were they right in themselves but that economic success itself depended on their application. Two developments have challenged those claims. The first was the West’s own betrayal of its principles: on too many occasions the self interest of the powerful, and disdain for the victims of collateral damage, has showed through. The second dates from more recently: the growth of Chinese capitalism owes nothing to a democratic system of government, let alone liberal values.


RightWeb
share